Apple iPhone 16 Pro vs Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
The Apple iPhone 16 Pro (2024) runs on the Apple A18 Pro, while the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra (2025) runs on the Snapdragon 8 Elite; estimated prices are $999 and $1099. By overall MobileRank rating, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra leads — 76/100 vs 73/100 (a 3-point difference). Key differences: the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra has the bigger battery (4700 mAh vs 3582); the main camera is 48 MP vs 50 MP; the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (3,113,462 vs 1,870,000); the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is thinner (7.2mm vs 8.3mm).
Apple iPhone 16 Pro
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
- Better Geekbench Single: 3400 vs 3041
- Cheaper: $999 vs $1099
- Better camera (86/100 vs 57/100)
- Higher AnTuTu: 3113462 vs 1870000
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9494 vs 8300
- Bigger battery: 4700 vs 3582 mAh
- Faster charging: 68W vs 27W
- Better main camera: 50MP vs 48MP
- Higher refresh rate: 165Hz vs 120Hz
- Faster wireless charging: 30W vs 25W
- Higher performance (92/100 vs 85/100)
- Longer battery life (58/100 vs 24/100)
- Better display (94/100 vs 85/100)
- Better portability (68/100 vs 56/100)
- Better value for money (64/100 vs 58/100)
Comparing the Apple iPhone 16 Pro vs the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra scores 3 points higher (76/100 vs 73/100). In the "camera" category, the Apple iPhone 16 Pro leads (86/100 vs 57/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra leads (58/100 vs 24/100). In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is a bit better (92/100 vs 85/100). In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is a bit better (94/100 vs 85/100). In the "camera" category, the Apple iPhone 16 Pro notably outperforms the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra (86/100 vs 57/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra significantly outperforms the Apple iPhone 16 Pro (58/100 vs 24/100). In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is a bit better (68/100 vs 56/100). In the "value for money" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is a bit better (64/100 vs 58/100).
| Specification | Apple iPhone 16 Pro | Motorola Razr 60 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Apple A18 Pro | Snapdragon 8 Elite | |
| AnTuTu | 1870000 | 3113462 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3400 | 3041 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 8300 | 9494 | |
| Display | 6.3" Super Retina XDR OLED | 7.0" pOLED | |
| Resolution | 2622x1206 | 1224x2912 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 165 Hz | |
| Battery | 3582 mAh | 4700 mAh | |
| Charging | 27W | 68W | |
| Wireless charging | 25W | 30W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | 157 | — | |
| Main camera | 48 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 48 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 12 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 12 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | iOS 18 | Android 15 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 2000 nits | 4500 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68 | IP48 | |
| Dimensions | 149.6×71.5×8.3 mm | 171.5×74.0×7.2 mm | |
| Weight | 199 g | 199 g | |
| Price | $999 | $1099 |
Apple iPhone 16 Pro
- Main: 48MP f/f/1.78
- Ultrawide: 48MP
- Telephoto: 12MP
- Front: 12MP
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Apple iPhone 16 Pro
- 6.3" Super Retina XDR OLED
- Resolution: 2622x1206
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
- 7.0" pOLED
- Resolution: 1224x2912
- Refresh rate: 165 Hz
Apple iPhone 16 Pro
- 3582 mAh
- Wired: 27W
- Wireless: 25W
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
- 4700 mAh
- Wired: 68W
- Wireless: 30W
We compared Apple iPhone 16 Pro and Motorola Razr 60 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra leads Apple iPhone 16 Pro by 39.9% in our overall performance rating.
Price difference: $100. Apple iPhone 16 Pro is cheaper by $100.
performance
In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is a bit better (92/100 vs 85/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is a bit better (94/100 vs 85/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Apple iPhone 16 Pro notably outperforms the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra (86/100 vs 57/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra significantly outperforms the Apple iPhone 16 Pro (58/100 vs 24/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is a bit better (68/100 vs 56/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is a bit better (64/100 vs 58/100).
Which is better: the Apple iPhone 16 Pro or the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra?
The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra edges out the Apple iPhone 16 Pro by just 3 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Apple iPhone 16 Pro and the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra?
The Apple iPhone 16 Pro has a MobileRank rating of 73/100, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra — 76/100.
Which has the better camera: the Apple iPhone 16 Pro or the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra?
The Apple iPhone 16 Pro leads on camera score (86/100 vs 57/100).
Which is more powerful: the Apple iPhone 16 Pro or the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra?
The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra leads on performance (92/100 vs 85/100).
Should you choose the Apple iPhone 16 Pro over the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra?
The Apple iPhone 16 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts. The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users.