Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max vs Vivo X300s

The Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max (2024) runs on the Apple A18 Pro, while the Vivo X300s (2026) runs on the Dimensity 9500; estimated prices are $1199 and $723. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300s leads — 89/100 vs 77/100 (a 12-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300s has the bigger battery (7100 mAh vs 4685); the main camera is 48 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300s is faster in AnTuTu (3,703,823 vs 1,890,000).

The Vivo X300s is noticeably better than the Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max — the overall rating gap is 12 points.
Profile comparison
Category scores
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max
Performance 85
Display 85
Camera 89
Battery 47
Portability 40
Value for money 64
Vivo X300s
Performance 94
Display 94
Camera 94
Battery 83
Portability 42
Value for money 90
What makes Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max better?
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3400 vs 3228

  • Overall rating 77/100
What makes Vivo X300s better?
  • Higher AnTuTu: 3703823 vs 1890000
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 9553 vs 8400
  • Bigger battery: 7100 vs 4685 mAh
  • Faster charging: 90W vs 27W
  • Better main camera: 200MP vs 48MP
  • Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
  • Faster wireless charging: 40W vs 25W
  • Lighter: 217g vs 227g
  • Cheaper: $723 vs $1199

  • Higher performance (94/100 vs 85/100)
  • Better camera (94/100 vs 89/100)
  • Longer battery life (83/100 vs 47/100)
  • Better display (94/100 vs 85/100)
  • Better portability (42/100 vs 40/100)
  • Better value for money (90/100 vs 64/100)
Comparison verdict

Comparing the Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max vs the Vivo X300s, the Vivo X300s scores 12 points higher (89/100 vs 77/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300s leads (83/100 vs 47/100). In the "value for money" category, the Vivo X300s leads (90/100 vs 64/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300s is a bit better (94/100 vs 85/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300s is a bit better (94/100 vs 85/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300s is a bit better (94/100 vs 89/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300s significantly outperforms the Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max (83/100 vs 47/100). In the "portability" category, the Vivo X300s and the Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max are nearly equal (42/100 vs 40/100). In the "value for money" category, the Vivo X300s notably outperforms the Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max (90/100 vs 64/100).

Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max: The Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts.
Vivo X300s: The Vivo X300s is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.
Specs comparison
Specification Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max Vivo X300s
Processor Apple A18 Pro Dimensity 9500
AnTuTu 1890000 3703823
Geekbench Single 3400 3228
Geekbench Multi 8400 9553
Display 6.9" Super Retina XDR OLED 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
Resolution 2868x1320 2800x1260
Refresh rate 120 Hz 144 Hz
Battery 4685 mAh 7100 mAh
Charging 27W 90W
Wireless charging 25W 40W
DXOMark (camera) 161
Main camera 48 MP 200 MP
Ultrawide 48 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 12 MP 50 MP
Front camera 12 MP 50 MP
RAM 8GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 256GB / 512GB / 1TB 256GB / 512GB / 1TB
OS iOS 18 Android 16 / OriginOS 6
Brightness (peak) 2000 nits
NFC yes
Protection IP68
Dimensions 163.0×77.6×8.3 mm
Weight 227 g 217 g
Price $1199 $723
Camera comparison
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max
  • Main: 48MP f/f/1.78
  • Ultrawide: 48MP
  • Telephoto: 12MP
  • Front: 12MP
89
camera
Vivo X300s
  • Main: 200MP f/f/1.7
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 50MP
94
camera
Display comparison
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max
  • 6.9" Super Retina XDR OLED
  • Resolution: 2868x1320
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
85
display
Vivo X300s
  • 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
  • Resolution: 2800x1260
  • Refresh rate: 144 Hz
94
display
Battery and charging
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max
  • 4685 mAh
  • Wired: 27W
  • Wireless: 25W
47
battery
Vivo X300s
  • 7100 mAh
  • Wired: 90W
  • Wireless: 40W
83
battery
Overall performance score

We compared Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max and Vivo X300s, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max Apple A18 Pro
77/100
1890000 AnTuTu
Vivo X300s Dimensity 9500
89/100 +49.0%
3703823 AnTuTu

Vivo X300s leads Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max by 49.0% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks
Price and availability
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max
$1199
Vivo X300s
$723

Price difference: $476. Vivo X300s is cheaper by $476.

Detailed category analysis
performance

In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300s is a bit better (94/100 vs 85/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Vivo X300s is a bit better (94/100 vs 85/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300s is a bit better (94/100 vs 89/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300s significantly outperforms the Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max (83/100 vs 47/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Vivo X300s and the Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max are nearly equal (42/100 vs 40/100).

value for money

In the "value for money" category, the Vivo X300s notably outperforms the Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max (90/100 vs 64/100).

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max or the Vivo X300s?

The Vivo X300s is noticeably better than the Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max — the overall rating gap is 12 points.

What is the rating of the Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max and the Vivo X300s?

The Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max has a MobileRank rating of 77/100, the Vivo X300s — 89/100.

Which has the better camera: the Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max or the Vivo X300s?

The Vivo X300s leads on camera score (94/100 vs 89/100).

Which is more powerful: the Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max or the Vivo X300s?

The Vivo X300s leads on performance (94/100 vs 85/100).

Should you choose the Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max over the Vivo X300s?

The Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts. The Vivo X300s is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.