Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max vs Motorola Razr Fold
The Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max (2024) runs on the Apple A18 Pro, while the Motorola Razr Fold (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; estimated prices are $1199 and $1799. By overall MobileRank rating, the Motorola Razr Fold leads — 77/100 vs 62/100 (a 15-point difference). Key differences: the Motorola Razr Fold has the bigger battery (5000 mAh vs 4685); the main camera is 48 MP vs 50 MP; the Motorola Razr Fold is faster in AnTuTu (3,942,923 vs 1,890,000); per DXOMark lab testing, the Motorola Razr Fold has the stronger camera (164 vs 161); the Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max is noticeably lighter (227g vs 285g).
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max
Motorola Razr Fold
- Faster wireless charging: 25W vs 15W
- Lighter: 227g vs 285g
- Cheaper: $1199 vs $1799
- Better design/ergonomics (16/100 vs 0/100)
- Better value for money (27/100 vs 0/100)
- Higher AnTuTu: 3942923 vs 1890000
- Better Geekbench Single: 3640 vs 3400
- Better Geekbench Multi: 11033 vs 8400
- Bigger battery: 5000 vs 4685 mAh
- Faster charging: 68W vs 27W
- Better main camera: 50MP vs 48MP
- Higher performance (92/100 vs 54/100)
- Better camera (91/100 vs 89/100)
- Longer battery life (51/100 vs 35/100)
Comparing the Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max vs the Motorola Razr Fold, the Motorola Razr Fold scores 15 points higher (77/100 vs 62/100). In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Fold leads (92/100 vs 54/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr Fold leads (51/100 vs 35/100). In the "value for money" category, the Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max leads (27/100 vs 0/100). In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max (92/100 vs 54/100). In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100. In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Fold and the Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max are nearly equal (91/100 vs 89/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr Fold notably outperforms the Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max (51/100 vs 35/100). In the "design" category, the Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max notably outperforms the Motorola Razr Fold (16/100 vs 0/100). In the "value for money" category, the Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max notably outperforms the Motorola Razr Fold (27/100 vs 0/100).
| Specification | Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max | Motorola Razr Fold | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Apple A18 Pro | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | |
| AnTuTu | 1890000 | 3942923 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3400 | 3640 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 8400 | 11033 | |
| Display | 6.9" Super Retina XDR OLED | 8.1" LTPO AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 2868x1320 | 2480x2200 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 4685 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 27W | 68W | |
| Wireless charging | 25W | 15W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | 161 | 164 | |
| Main camera | 48 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 48 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 12 MP | 10 MP | |
| Front camera | 12 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB | 12GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | iOS 18 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 2000 nits | 6200 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68 | IPX9 | |
| Dimensions | 163.0×77.6×8.3 mm | 160.1×144.5×4.7 mm | |
| Weight | 227 g | 285 g | |
| Price | $1199 | $1799 |
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max
- Main: 48MP f/f/1.78
- Ultrawide: 48MP
- Telephoto: 12MP
- Front: 12MP
Motorola Razr Fold
- Main: 50MP f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 10MP
- Front: 32MP
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max
- 6.9" Super Retina XDR OLED
- Resolution: 2868x1320
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Motorola Razr Fold
- 8.1" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 2480x2200
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max
- 4685 mAh
- Wired: 27W
- Wireless: 25W
Motorola Razr Fold
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 68W
- Wireless: 15W
We compared Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max and Motorola Razr Fold, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Motorola Razr Fold leads Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max by 52.1% in our overall performance rating.
Price difference: $600. Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max is cheaper by $600.
performance
In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max (92/100 vs 54/100).
display
In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100.
camera
In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Fold and the Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max are nearly equal (91/100 vs 89/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr Fold notably outperforms the Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max (51/100 vs 35/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max notably outperforms the Motorola Razr Fold (16/100 vs 0/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, the Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max notably outperforms the Motorola Razr Fold (27/100 vs 0/100).
Which is better: the Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max or the Motorola Razr Fold?
The Motorola Razr Fold is noticeably better than the Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max — the overall rating gap is 15 points.
What is the rating of the Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max and the Motorola Razr Fold?
The Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max has a MobileRank rating of 62/100, the Motorola Razr Fold — 77/100.
Which is more powerful: the Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max or the Motorola Razr Fold?
The Motorola Razr Fold leads on performance (92/100 vs 54/100).
Should you choose the Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max over the Motorola Razr Fold?
The Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max is a better fit for mobile photography enthusiasts. The Motorola Razr Fold is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts.