Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max vs Motorola Razr 70 Ultra
The Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max (2024) runs on the Apple A18 Pro, while the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; launch prices were $1199 and $1099. Both devices score the same overall rating of 77/100. Key differences: the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra has the bigger battery (5000 mAh vs 4685); the main camera is 48 MP vs 50 MP; the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (3,126,402 vs 1,782,199); the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra is noticeably lighter (199g vs 227g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max
Motorola Razr 70 Ultra
What makes Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max better?
- Better Geekbench Single: 3400 vs 3013
- Faster wireless charging: 25W vs 15W
- Better camera (89/100 vs 60/100)
What makes Motorola Razr 70 Ultra better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3126402 vs 1782199
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9287 vs 8400
- Bigger battery: 5000 vs 4685 mAh
- Faster charging: 68W vs 27W
- Better main camera: 50MP vs 48MP
- Higher refresh rate: 165Hz vs 120Hz
- Lighter: 199g vs 227g
- Cheaper at launch: $1099 vs $1199
- Higher performance (91/100 vs 85/100)
- Longer battery life (61/100 vs 47/100)
- Better display (95/100 vs 85/100)
- Better portability (68/100 vs 40/100)
Comparison verdict
The Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max and the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra received the same MobileRank rating — 77/100. In the "camera" category, the Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max leads (89/100 vs 60/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra leads (61/100 vs 47/100). Value score: Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max — 64/100, Motorola Razr 70 Ultra — 64/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra is a bit better (91/100 vs 85/100). In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra is a bit better (95/100 vs 85/100). In the "camera" category, the Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max notably outperforms the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra (89/100 vs 60/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra is a bit better (61/100 vs 47/100). In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra notably outperforms the Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max (68/100 vs 40/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max | Motorola Razr 70 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Apple A18 Pro | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | |
| AnTuTu | 1782199 | 3126402 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3400 | 3013 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 8400 | 9287 | |
| Display | 6.9" Super Retina XDR OLED | 7.0" pOLED | |
| Resolution | 2868x1320 | 1224x2992 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 165 Hz | |
| Battery | 4685 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 27W | 68W | |
| Wireless charging | 25W | 15W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | 161 | — | |
| Main camera | 48 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 48 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 12 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 12 MP | 50 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB | 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | 512GB | |
| OS | iOS 18 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 2000 nits | 5000 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68 | IP48 | |
| Dimensions | 163.0×77.6×8.3 mm | 171.5×74.0×7.2 mm | |
| Weight | 227 g | 199 g | |
| Launch price | $1199 | $1099 |
Camera comparison
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max
- Main: 48MP f/1.78
- Ultrawide: 48MP
- Telephoto: 12MP
- Front: 12MP
Motorola Razr 70 Ultra
- Main: 50MP f/1.9
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Front: 50MP
Display comparison
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max
- 6.9" Super Retina XDR OLED
- Resolution: 2868x1320
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Motorola Razr 70 Ultra
- 7.0" pOLED
- Resolution: 1224x2992
- Refresh rate: 165 Hz
Battery and charging
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max
- 4685 mAh
- Wired: 27W
- Wireless: 25W
Motorola Razr 70 Ultra
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 68W
- Wireless: 15W
Overall performance score
We compared Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max and Motorola Razr 70 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Motorola Razr 70 Ultra leads Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max by 43.0% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $100. Motorola Razr 70 Ultra was $100 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra is a bit better (91/100 vs 85/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra is a bit better (95/100 vs 85/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max notably outperforms the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra (89/100 vs 60/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra is a bit better (61/100 vs 47/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra notably outperforms the Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max (68/100 vs 40/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max or the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra?
Both devices scored 77/100. The choice depends on your priorities: if performance matters more — go with the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra (91/100 vs 85/100).
What is the rating of the Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max and the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra?
The Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max has a MobileRank rating of 77/100, the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra — 77/100.
Which has the better camera: the Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max or the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra?
The Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max leads on camera score (89/100 vs 60/100).
Which is more powerful: the Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max or the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra?
The Motorola Razr 70 Ultra leads on performance (91/100 vs 85/100).
Should you choose the Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max over the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra?
The Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts. The Motorola Razr 70 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users.