Xiaomi 17 Pro Max vs ZTE Axon 60 Ultra

The Xiaomi 17 Pro Max (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, while the ZTE Axon 60 Ultra (2024) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2; launch prices were $999 and $700. By overall MobileRank rating, the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max leads — 88/100 vs 73/100 (a 15-point difference). Key differences: the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max has the bigger battery (7500 mAh vs 6000); the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max is faster in AnTuTu (3,998,145 vs 1,757,044); the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max is thinner (8.0mm vs 9.1mm).

The Xiaomi 17 Pro Max is noticeably better than the ZTE Axon 60 Ultra — the overall rating gap is 15 points.

Profile comparison

Category scores

Xiaomi 17 Pro Max

Performance 98
Display 81
Camera 87
Battery 89
Portability 48
Value for money 86

ZTE Axon 60 Ultra

Performance 76
Display 84
Camera 78
Battery 63
Portability 30
Value for money 60

What makes Xiaomi 17 Pro Max better?

  • Higher AnTuTu: 3998145 vs 1757044
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3639 vs 2004
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 11047 vs 5311
  • Bigger battery: 7500 vs 6000 mAh
  • Faster charging: 100W vs 80W

  • Higher performance (98/100 vs 76/100)
  • Better camera (87/100 vs 78/100)
  • Longer battery life (89/100 vs 63/100)
  • Better portability (48/100 vs 30/100)

What makes ZTE Axon 60 Ultra better?

  • Cheaper at launch: $700 vs $999

  • Better display (84/100 vs 81/100)

Comparison verdict

Comparing the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max vs the ZTE Axon 60 Ultra, the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max scores 15 points higher (88/100 vs 73/100). In the "performance" category, the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max leads (98/100 vs 76/100). In the "battery" category, the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max leads (89/100 vs 63/100). Value score: Xiaomi 17 Pro Max — 86/100, ZTE Axon 60 Ultra — 60/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max notably outperforms the ZTE Axon 60 Ultra (98/100 vs 76/100). In the "display" category, the ZTE Axon 60 Ultra and the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max are nearly equal (84/100 vs 81/100). In the "camera" category, the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max is a bit better (87/100 vs 78/100). In the "battery" category, the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max notably outperforms the ZTE Axon 60 Ultra (89/100 vs 63/100). In the "portability" category, the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max notably outperforms the ZTE Axon 60 Ultra (48/100 vs 30/100).

Xiaomi 17 Pro Max: The Xiaomi 17 Pro Max is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.
ZTE Axon 60 Ultra: The ZTE Axon 60 Ultra is a better fit for active users.

Specs comparison

Specification Xiaomi 17 Pro Max ZTE Axon 60 Ultra
Processor Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
AnTuTu 3998145 1757044
Geekbench Single 3639 2004
Geekbench Multi 11047 5311
Display 6.9" LTPO AMOLED 6.8" AMOLED
Resolution 1200x2608 1260x2800
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 7500 mAh 6000 mAh
Charging 100W 80W
Wireless charging 50W 0W
DXOMark (camera) 159 —
Main camera 50 MP 50 MP
Ultrawide 50 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 50 MP 50 MP
Front camera 50 MP 32 MP
RAM 12GB / 16GB 12GB
Storage 512GB / 1TB 256GB / 512GB
OS Android 16 Android 14
Brightness (peak) 3500 nits —
NFC yes yes
Protection IP68 IP68
Dimensions 162.9×77.6×8.0 mm 163.6×76.0×9.1 mm
Weight 219 g —
Launch price $999 $700

Camera comparison

Xiaomi 17 Pro Max

  • Main: 50MP f/1.69
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 50MP
87
camera

ZTE Axon 60 Ultra

  • Main: 50MP
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 32MP
78
camera

Display comparison

Xiaomi 17 Pro Max

  • 6.9" LTPO AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1200x2608
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
81
display

ZTE Axon 60 Ultra

  • 6.8" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1260x2800
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
84
display

Battery and charging

Xiaomi 17 Pro Max

  • 7500 mAh
  • NanoReview test: web browsing 16:28 hrs, total 36:26 hrs
  • Wired: 100W
  • Wireless: 50W
89
battery

ZTE Axon 60 Ultra

  • 6000 mAh
  • Wired: 80W
  • No wireless charging
63
battery

Overall performance score

We compared Xiaomi 17 Pro Max and ZTE Axon 60 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Xiaomi 17 Pro Max Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
88/100
3998145 AnTuTu
ZTE Axon 60 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
73/100 -127.5%
1757044 AnTuTu

Xiaomi 17 Pro Max leads ZTE Axon 60 Ultra by 127.5% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks

Launch prices and where to check today's

Xiaomi 17 Pro Max

$999

ZTE Axon 60 Ultra

$700

Launch price difference: $299. ZTE Axon 60 Ultra was $299 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max notably outperforms the ZTE Axon 60 Ultra (98/100 vs 76/100).

display

In the "display" category, the ZTE Axon 60 Ultra and the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max are nearly equal (84/100 vs 81/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max is a bit better (87/100 vs 78/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max notably outperforms the ZTE Axon 60 Ultra (89/100 vs 63/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max notably outperforms the ZTE Axon 60 Ultra (48/100 vs 30/100).

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max or the ZTE Axon 60 Ultra?

The Xiaomi 17 Pro Max is noticeably better than the ZTE Axon 60 Ultra — the overall rating gap is 15 points.

What is the rating of the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max and the ZTE Axon 60 Ultra?

The Xiaomi 17 Pro Max has a MobileRank rating of 88/100, the ZTE Axon 60 Ultra — 73/100.

Which has the better camera: the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max or the ZTE Axon 60 Ultra?

The Xiaomi 17 Pro Max leads on camera score (87/100 vs 78/100).

Which is more powerful: the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max or the ZTE Axon 60 Ultra?

The Xiaomi 17 Pro Max leads on performance (98/100 vs 76/100).

Should you choose the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max over the ZTE Axon 60 Ultra?

The Xiaomi 17 Pro Max is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers. The ZTE Axon 60 Ultra is a better fit for active users.