Vivo Y77 (China) vs ZTE Blade A76 4G
Comparing the Vivo Y77 (China) (2022) and the ZTE Blade A76 4G (2025) on specs and benchmarks. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo Y77 (China) leads — 29/100 vs 25/100 (a 4-point difference). Key differences: the ZTE Blade A76 4G has the bigger battery (5000 mAh vs 4500).
Vivo Y77 (China)
ZTE Blade A76 4G
- Faster charging: 80W vs 5W
- Higher refresh rate: 120Hz vs 90Hz
- Longer battery life (39/100 vs 36/100)
- Better display (100/100 vs 50/100)
- Better design/ergonomics (57/100 vs 50/100)
- Bigger battery: 5000 vs 4500 mAh
- Better value for money (100/100 vs 55/100)
Comparing the Vivo Y77 (China) vs the ZTE Blade A76 4G, the Vivo Y77 (China) scores 4 points higher (29/100 vs 25/100). In the "value for money" category, the ZTE Blade A76 4G leads (100/100 vs 55/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100. In the "display" category, the Vivo Y77 (China) significantly outperforms the ZTE Blade A76 4G (100/100 vs 50/100). In the "camera" category, both devices are on the same level — 24/100. In the "battery" category, the Vivo Y77 (China) and the ZTE Blade A76 4G are nearly equal (39/100 vs 36/100). In the "design" category, the Vivo Y77 (China) is a bit better (57/100 vs 50/100). In the "value for money" category, the ZTE Blade A76 4G significantly outperforms the Vivo Y77 (China) (100/100 vs 55/100).
| Specification | Vivo Y77 (China) | ZTE Blade A76 4G | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 930 | — | |
| AnTuTu | — | — | |
| Geekbench Single | — | — | |
| Geekbench Multi | — | — | |
| Display | 6.6" IPS LCD | 6.8" IPS LCD | |
| Resolution | 1080x2388 | 720x1612 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 90 Hz | |
| Battery | 4500 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 80W | 5W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 8 MP | — | |
| RAM | 6GB / 8GB / 12GB | 4GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB | 64GB / 128GB | |
| OS | Android 12, Origin OS Ocean | Android 15 | |
| NFC | no | no | |
| Protection | — | IP54 | |
| Dimensions | 164.2×75.8×8.6 mm | — | |
| Weight | 194 g | — | |
| Price | — | $105 |
Vivo Y77 (China)
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Front: 8MP
ZTE Blade A76 4G
- Main: 50MP
- Front: —
Vivo Y77 (China)
- 6.6" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 1080x2388
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
ZTE Blade A76 4G
- 6.8" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 720x1612
- Refresh rate: 90 Hz
Vivo Y77 (China)
- 4500 mAh
- Wired: 80W
- No wireless charging
ZTE Blade A76 4G
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 5W
- No wireless charging
Vivo Y77 (China)
Price unknownperformance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100.
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo Y77 (China) significantly outperforms the ZTE Blade A76 4G (100/100 vs 50/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, both devices are on the same level — 24/100.
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo Y77 (China) and the ZTE Blade A76 4G are nearly equal (39/100 vs 36/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Vivo Y77 (China) is a bit better (57/100 vs 50/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, the ZTE Blade A76 4G significantly outperforms the Vivo Y77 (China) (100/100 vs 55/100).
Which is better: the Vivo Y77 (China) or the ZTE Blade A76 4G?
The Vivo Y77 (China) edges out the ZTE Blade A76 4G by just 4 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Vivo Y77 (China) and the ZTE Blade A76 4G?
The Vivo Y77 (China) has a MobileRank rating of 29/100, the ZTE Blade A76 4G — 25/100.
Should you choose the Vivo Y77 (China) over the ZTE Blade A76 4G?
The Vivo Y77 (China) is a better fit for everyday use. The ZTE Blade A76 4G is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers.