Vivo iQOO Z7 Pro vs ZTE Blade A76 4G
Comparing the Vivo iQOO Z7 Pro (2023) and the ZTE Blade A76 4G (2025) on specs and benchmarks. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo iQOO Z7 Pro leads — 33/100 vs 25/100 (a 8-point difference). Key differences: the ZTE Blade A76 4G has the bigger battery (5000 mAh vs 4600); the main camera is 64 MP vs 50 MP.
Vivo iQOO Z7 Pro
ZTE Blade A76 4G
- Faster charging: 66W vs 5W
- Better main camera: 64MP vs 50MP
- Higher refresh rate: 120Hz vs 90Hz
- Better camera (37/100 vs 24/100)
- Longer battery life (37/100 vs 36/100)
- Better display (100/100 vs 50/100)
- Better design/ergonomics (81/100 vs 50/100)
- Bigger battery: 5000 vs 4600 mAh
- Better value for money (100/100 vs 55/100)
Comparing the Vivo iQOO Z7 Pro vs the ZTE Blade A76 4G, the Vivo iQOO Z7 Pro scores 8 points higher (33/100 vs 25/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO Z7 Pro leads (37/100 vs 24/100). In the "value for money" category, the ZTE Blade A76 4G leads (100/100 vs 55/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100. In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO Z7 Pro significantly outperforms the ZTE Blade A76 4G (100/100 vs 50/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO Z7 Pro is a bit better (37/100 vs 24/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO Z7 Pro and the ZTE Blade A76 4G are nearly equal (37/100 vs 36/100). In the "design" category, the Vivo iQOO Z7 Pro significantly outperforms the ZTE Blade A76 4G (81/100 vs 50/100). In the "value for money" category, the ZTE Blade A76 4G significantly outperforms the Vivo iQOO Z7 Pro (100/100 vs 55/100).
| Specification | Vivo iQOO Z7 Pro | ZTE Blade A76 4G | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 7200 | — | |
| AnTuTu | — | — | |
| Geekbench Single | — | — | |
| Geekbench Multi | — | — | |
| Display | 6.8" AMOLED | 6.8" IPS LCD | |
| Resolution | 1080x2400 | 720x1612 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 90 Hz | |
| Battery | 4600 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 66W | 5W | |
| Main camera | 64 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 16 MP | — | |
| RAM | 8GB | 4GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB | 64GB / 128GB | |
| OS | Android 13, planned upgrade to Android 14, Funtouch 14 | Android 15 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 1300 nits | — | |
| NFC | no | no | |
| Protection | — | IP54 | |
| Dimensions | 164.1×74.8×7.4 mm | — | |
| Weight | 175 g | — | |
| Price | — | $105 |
Vivo iQOO Z7 Pro
- Main: 64MP f/f/1.8
- Front: 16MP
ZTE Blade A76 4G
- Main: 50MP
- Front: —
Vivo iQOO Z7 Pro
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
ZTE Blade A76 4G
- 6.8" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 720x1612
- Refresh rate: 90 Hz
Vivo iQOO Z7 Pro
- 4600 mAh
- Wired: 66W
- No wireless charging
ZTE Blade A76 4G
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 5W
- No wireless charging
Vivo iQOO Z7 Pro
Price unknownperformance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100.
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO Z7 Pro significantly outperforms the ZTE Blade A76 4G (100/100 vs 50/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO Z7 Pro is a bit better (37/100 vs 24/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO Z7 Pro and the ZTE Blade A76 4G are nearly equal (37/100 vs 36/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Vivo iQOO Z7 Pro significantly outperforms the ZTE Blade A76 4G (81/100 vs 50/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, the ZTE Blade A76 4G significantly outperforms the Vivo iQOO Z7 Pro (100/100 vs 55/100).
Which is better: the Vivo iQOO Z7 Pro or the ZTE Blade A76 4G?
The Vivo iQOO Z7 Pro edges out the ZTE Blade A76 4G by just 8 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Vivo iQOO Z7 Pro and the ZTE Blade A76 4G?
The Vivo iQOO Z7 Pro has a MobileRank rating of 33/100, the ZTE Blade A76 4G — 25/100.
Which has the better camera: the Vivo iQOO Z7 Pro or the ZTE Blade A76 4G?
The Vivo iQOO Z7 Pro leads on camera score (37/100 vs 24/100).
Should you choose the Vivo iQOO Z7 Pro over the ZTE Blade A76 4G?
The Vivo iQOO Z7 Pro is a better fit for everyday use. The ZTE Blade A76 4G is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers.