Vivo Y77 (China) vs ZTE Blade A75
The Vivo Y77 (China) (2022) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 930, while the ZTE Blade A75 (2024) runs on the Unisoc T760. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo Y77 (China) leads — 45/100 vs 43/100 (a 2-point difference). Key differences: the ZTE Blade A75 has the bigger battery (5000 mAh vs 4500); the ZTE Blade A75 is faster in AnTuTu (628,581 vs 593,307); the ZTE Blade A75 has NFC for contactless payments, the Vivo Y77 (China) doesn't.
Profile comparison
Category scores
Vivo Y77 (China)
ZTE Blade A75
What makes Vivo Y77 (China) better?
- Better Geekbench Single: 915 vs 735
- Faster charging: 80W vs 18W
- Higher performance (47/100 vs 46/100)
- Longer battery life (45/100 vs 43/100)
- Better display (66/100 vs 56/100)
What makes ZTE Blade A75 better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 628581 vs 593307
- Better Geekbench Multi: 2318 vs 2299
- Bigger battery: 5000 vs 4500 mAh
- Lighter: 189g vs 194g
- Better portability (59/100 vs 56/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Vivo Y77 (China) vs the ZTE Blade A75, the Vivo Y77 (China) scores 2 points higher (45/100 vs 43/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo Y77 (China) and the ZTE Blade A75 are nearly equal (47/100 vs 46/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo Y77 (China) is a bit better (66/100 vs 56/100). In the "camera" category, both devices are on the same level — 30/100. In the "battery" category, the Vivo Y77 (China) and the ZTE Blade A75 are nearly equal (45/100 vs 43/100). In the "portability" category, the ZTE Blade A75 and the Vivo Y77 (China) are nearly equal (59/100 vs 56/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Vivo Y77 (China) | ZTE Blade A75 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 930 | Unisoc T760 | |
| AnTuTu | 593307 | 628581 | |
| Geekbench Single | 915 | 735 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2299 | 2318 | |
| Display | 6.6" IPS LCD | 6.6" IPS LCD | |
| Resolution | 1080x2388 | 720x1612 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 4500 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 80W | 18W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 8 MP | 8 MP | |
| RAM | 6GB / 8GB / 12GB | 4GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB | 128GB | |
| OS | Android 12, Origin OS Ocean | Android 13 | |
| NFC | no | yes | |
| Dimensions | 164.2×75.8×8.6 mm | 163.6×74.9×8.6 mm | |
| Weight | 194 g | 189 g | |
| Launch price | — | — |
Camera comparison
Vivo Y77 (China)
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Front: 8MP
ZTE Blade A75
- Main: 50MP
- Front: 8MP
Display comparison
Vivo Y77 (China)
- 6.6" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 1080x2388
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
ZTE Blade A75
- 6.6" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 720x1612
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Vivo Y77 (China)
- 4500 mAh
- Wired: 80W
- No wireless charging
ZTE Blade A75
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 18W
- No wireless charging
Overall performance score
We compared Vivo Y77 (China) and ZTE Blade A75, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
ZTE Blade A75 leads Vivo Y77 (China) by 5.6% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo Y77 (China) and the ZTE Blade A75 are nearly equal (47/100 vs 46/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo Y77 (China) is a bit better (66/100 vs 56/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, both devices are on the same level — 30/100.
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo Y77 (China) and the ZTE Blade A75 are nearly equal (45/100 vs 43/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the ZTE Blade A75 and the Vivo Y77 (China) are nearly equal (59/100 vs 56/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Vivo Y77 (China) or the ZTE Blade A75?
The Vivo Y77 (China) edges out the ZTE Blade A75 by just 2 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Vivo Y77 (China) and the ZTE Blade A75?
The Vivo Y77 (China) has a MobileRank rating of 45/100, the ZTE Blade A75 — 43/100.
Should you choose the Vivo Y77 (China) over the ZTE Blade A75?
Neither model stands out enough to recommend it for a specific use case: the clearest difference is display — better on the Vivo Y77 (China) (66/100 vs 56/100).