Vivo Y32t vs ZTE Axon 60 Lite
The Vivo Y32t (2022) runs on the MediaTek Helio P70 (), while the ZTE Axon 60 Lite (2024) runs on the Unisoc T606. By overall MobileRank rating, the ZTE Axon 60 Lite leads — 32/100 vs 28/100 (a 4-point difference). Key differences: the main camera is 13 MP vs 50 MP; the ZTE Axon 60 Lite is faster in AnTuTu (333,647 vs 303,398).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Vivo Y32t
ZTE Axon 60 Lite
What makes Vivo Y32t better?
- Longer battery life (52/100 vs 43/100)
- Better display (39/100 vs 34/100)
- Better portability (68/100 vs 44/100)
What makes ZTE Axon 60 Lite better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 333647 vs 303398
- Better Geekbench Single: 378 vs 341
- Better Geekbench Multi: 1335 vs 779
- Better main camera: 50MP vs 13MP
- Higher performance (27/100 vs 20/100)
- Better camera (30/100 vs 10/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Vivo Y32t vs the ZTE Axon 60 Lite, the ZTE Axon 60 Lite scores 4 points higher (32/100 vs 28/100). In the "camera" category, the ZTE Axon 60 Lite leads (30/100 vs 10/100). In the "performance" category, the ZTE Axon 60 Lite is a bit better (27/100 vs 20/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo Y32t is a bit better (39/100 vs 34/100). In the "camera" category, the ZTE Axon 60 Lite notably outperforms the Vivo Y32t (30/100 vs 10/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo Y32t is a bit better (52/100 vs 43/100). In the "portability" category, the Vivo Y32t notably outperforms the ZTE Axon 60 Lite (68/100 vs 44/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Vivo Y32t | ZTE Axon 60 Lite | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Helio P70 () | Unisoc T606 | |
| AnTuTu | 303398 | 333647 | |
| Geekbench Single | 341 | 378 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 779 | 1335 | |
| Display | 6.5" LCD IPS | 6.6" | |
| Resolution | 720x1600 | 720x1612 | |
| Refresh rate | — | — | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | — | 5W | |
| Main camera | 13 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 8 MP | 8 MP | |
| RAM | — | 4GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB | 256GB | |
| OS | Android 11 Red Velvet Cake | Android 13 | |
| NFC | no | no | |
| Dimensions | 164.0×75.2×8.3 mm | 164.2×75.3×8.6 mm | |
| Weight | 179 g | — | |
| Launch price | — | — |
Camera comparison
Vivo Y32t
- Main: 13MP
- Front: 8MP
ZTE Axon 60 Lite
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Front: 8MP
Display comparison
Vivo Y32t
- 6.5" LCD IPS
- Resolution: 720x1600
- Refresh rate: —
ZTE Axon 60 Lite
- 6.6"
- Resolution: 720x1612
- Refresh rate: —
Battery and charging
Vivo Y32t
- 5000 mAh
- No wireless charging
ZTE Axon 60 Lite
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 5W
- No wireless charging
Overall performance score
We compared Vivo Y32t and ZTE Axon 60 Lite, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
ZTE Axon 60 Lite leads Vivo Y32t by 9.1% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the ZTE Axon 60 Lite is a bit better (27/100 vs 20/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo Y32t is a bit better (39/100 vs 34/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the ZTE Axon 60 Lite notably outperforms the Vivo Y32t (30/100 vs 10/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo Y32t is a bit better (52/100 vs 43/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Vivo Y32t notably outperforms the ZTE Axon 60 Lite (68/100 vs 44/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Vivo Y32t or the ZTE Axon 60 Lite?
The ZTE Axon 60 Lite edges out the Vivo Y32t by just 4 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Vivo Y32t and the ZTE Axon 60 Lite?
The Vivo Y32t has a MobileRank rating of 28/100, the ZTE Axon 60 Lite — 32/100.
Which has the better camera: the Vivo Y32t or the ZTE Axon 60 Lite?
The ZTE Axon 60 Lite leads on camera score (30/100 vs 10/100).
Which is more powerful: the Vivo Y32t or the ZTE Axon 60 Lite?
The ZTE Axon 60 Lite leads on performance (27/100 vs 20/100).
Should you choose the Vivo Y32t over the ZTE Axon 60 Lite?
Neither model stands out enough to recommend it for a specific use case: the clearest difference is portability — better on the Vivo Y32t (68/100 vs 44/100).