Vivo Y32 vs Xiaomi 17 Pro Max
The Vivo Y32 (2026) runs on the Unisoc T7300, while the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5. By overall MobileRank rating, the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max leads — 88/100 vs 45/100 (a 43-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo Y32 has the bigger battery (8000 mAh vs 7500); the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max has NFC for contactless payments, the Vivo Y32 doesn't.
Profile comparison
Category scores
Vivo Y32
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max
What makes Vivo Y32 better?
- Bigger battery: 8000 vs 7500 mAh
- Overall rating 45/100
What makes Xiaomi 17 Pro Max better?
- Faster charging: 100W vs 44W
- Lighter: 219g vs 229g
- Better camera (87/100 vs 30/100)
- Longer battery life (89/100 vs 63/100)
- Better display (81/100 vs 55/100)
- Better portability (48/100 vs 34/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Vivo Y32 vs the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max, the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max scores 43 points higher (88/100 vs 45/100). In the "camera" category, the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max leads (87/100 vs 30/100). In the "battery" category, the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max leads (89/100 vs 63/100). In the "display" category, the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max notably outperforms the Vivo Y32 (81/100 vs 55/100). In the "camera" category, the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max significantly outperforms the Vivo Y32 (87/100 vs 30/100). In the "battery" category, the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max notably outperforms the Vivo Y32 (89/100 vs 63/100). In the "portability" category, the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max is a bit better (48/100 vs 34/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Vivo Y32 | Xiaomi 17 Pro Max | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Unisoc T7300 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | |
| AnTuTu | — | 3998145 | |
| Geekbench Single | — | 3639 | |
| Geekbench Multi | — | 11047 | |
| Display | 6.9" IPS LCD | 6.9" LTPO AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 720x1592 | 1200x2608 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 8000 mAh | 7500 mAh | |
| Charging | 44W | 100W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 50W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 159 | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 8 MP | 50 MP | |
| RAM | 4GB / 6GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 128GB | 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 1300 nits | 3500 nits | |
| NFC | no | yes | |
| Protection | IP68/IP69 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 169.6×79.2×8.7 mm | 162.9×77.6×8.0 mm | |
| Weight | 229 g | 219 g | |
| Launch price | — | $999 |
Camera comparison
Vivo Y32
- Main: 50MP f/2.0
- Front: 8MP
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max
- Main: 50MP f/1.69
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 50MP
Display comparison
Vivo Y32
- 6.9" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 720x1592
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max
- 6.9" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 1200x2608
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Vivo Y32
- 8000 mAh
- Wired: 44W
- No wireless charging
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max
- 7500 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 16:28 hrs, total 36:26 hrs
- Wired: 100W
- Wireless: 50W
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Vivo Y32
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
display
In the "display" category, the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max notably outperforms the Vivo Y32 (81/100 vs 55/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max significantly outperforms the Vivo Y32 (87/100 vs 30/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max notably outperforms the Vivo Y32 (89/100 vs 63/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max is a bit better (48/100 vs 34/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Vivo Y32 or the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max?
The Xiaomi 17 Pro Max significantly outperforms the Vivo Y32 by 43 points (88/100 vs 45/100).
What is the rating of the Vivo Y32 and the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max?
The Vivo Y32 has a MobileRank rating of 45/100, the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max — 88/100.
Which has the better camera: the Vivo Y32 or the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max?
The Xiaomi 17 Pro Max leads on camera score (87/100 vs 30/100).
Should you choose the Vivo Y32 over the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max?
The Xiaomi 17 Pro Max is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.