Vivo Y300t vs Xiaomi 17 Pro Max
The Vivo Y300t (2025) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 7300, while the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5. By overall MobileRank rating, the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max leads — 88/100 vs 50/100 (a 38-point difference). Key differences: the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max has the bigger battery (7500 mAh vs 6500); the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max is faster in AnTuTu (3,998,145 vs 879,714); the Vivo Y300t is noticeably lighter (204g vs 219g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Vivo Y300t
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max
What makes Vivo Y300t better?
- Lighter: 204g vs 219g
- Better portability (56/100 vs 48/100)
What makes Xiaomi 17 Pro Max better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3998145 vs 879714
- Better Geekbench Single: 3639 vs 1001
- Better Geekbench Multi: 11047 vs 2918
- Bigger battery: 7500 vs 6500 mAh
- Faster charging: 100W vs 44W
- Higher performance (98/100 vs 55/100)
- Better camera (87/100 vs 30/100)
- Longer battery life (89/100 vs 58/100)
- Better display (81/100 vs 66/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Vivo Y300t vs the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max, the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max scores 38 points higher (88/100 vs 50/100). In the "performance" category, the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max leads (98/100 vs 55/100). In the "camera" category, the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max leads (87/100 vs 30/100). In the "battery" category, the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max leads (89/100 vs 58/100). In the "performance" category, the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max significantly outperforms the Vivo Y300t (98/100 vs 55/100). In the "display" category, the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max notably outperforms the Vivo Y300t (81/100 vs 66/100). In the "camera" category, the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max significantly outperforms the Vivo Y300t (87/100 vs 30/100). In the "battery" category, the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max significantly outperforms the Vivo Y300t (89/100 vs 58/100). In the "portability" category, the Vivo Y300t is a bit better (56/100 vs 48/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Vivo Y300t | Xiaomi 17 Pro Max | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 7300 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | |
| AnTuTu | 879714 | 3998145 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1001 | 3639 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2918 | 11047 | |
| Display | 6.7" IPS LCD | 6.9" LTPO AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2408 | 1200x2608 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 6500 mAh | 7500 mAh | |
| Charging | 44W | 100W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 50W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 159 | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 8 MP | 50 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB / 12GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB / 512GB | 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 15, OriginOS 5 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 1050 nits | 3500 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP64 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 165.7×76.3×8.1 mm | 162.9×77.6×8.0 mm | |
| Weight | 204 g | 219 g | |
| Launch price | — | $999 |
Camera comparison
Vivo Y300t
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Front: 8MP
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max
- Main: 50MP f/1.69
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 50MP
Display comparison
Vivo Y300t
- 6.7" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 1080x2408
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max
- 6.9" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 1200x2608
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Vivo Y300t
- 6500 mAh
- Wired: 44W
- No wireless charging
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max
- 7500 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 16:28 hrs, total 36:26 hrs
- Wired: 100W
- Wireless: 50W
Overall performance score
We compared Vivo Y300t and Xiaomi 17 Pro Max, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max leads Vivo Y300t by 78.0% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Vivo Y300t
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max significantly outperforms the Vivo Y300t (98/100 vs 55/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max notably outperforms the Vivo Y300t (81/100 vs 66/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max significantly outperforms the Vivo Y300t (87/100 vs 30/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max significantly outperforms the Vivo Y300t (89/100 vs 58/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Vivo Y300t is a bit better (56/100 vs 48/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Vivo Y300t or the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max?
The Xiaomi 17 Pro Max significantly outperforms the Vivo Y300t by 38 points (88/100 vs 50/100).
What is the rating of the Vivo Y300t and the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max?
The Vivo Y300t has a MobileRank rating of 50/100, the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max — 88/100.
Which has the better camera: the Vivo Y300t or the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max?
The Xiaomi 17 Pro Max leads on camera score (87/100 vs 30/100).
Which is more powerful: the Vivo Y300t or the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max?
The Xiaomi 17 Pro Max leads on performance (98/100 vs 55/100).
Should you choose the Vivo Y300t over the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max?
The Xiaomi 17 Pro Max is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.