Vivo Y200 (China) vs Xiaomi 17 Ultra
The Vivo Y200 (China) (2024) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1, while the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5. By overall MobileRank rating, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra leads — 89/100 vs 53/100 (a 36-point difference). Key differences: the Xiaomi 17 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (3,667,711 vs 737,054); the Xiaomi 17 Ultra has NFC for contactless payments, the Vivo Y200 (China) doesn't; the Vivo Y200 (China) is noticeably lighter (187g vs 226g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Vivo Y200 (China)
Xiaomi 17 Ultra
What makes Vivo Y200 (China) better?
- Lighter: 187g vs 226g
- Better portability (67/100 vs 40/100)
What makes Xiaomi 17 Ultra better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3667711 vs 737054
- Better Geekbench Single: 3639 vs 930
- Better Geekbench Multi: 11047 vs 2700
- Faster charging: 90W vs 80W
- Higher performance (97/100 vs 52/100)
- Better camera (93/100 vs 30/100)
- Longer battery life (80/100 vs 63/100)
- Better display (89/100 vs 79/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Vivo Y200 (China) vs the Xiaomi 17 Ultra, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra scores 36 points higher (89/100 vs 53/100). In the "performance" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra leads (97/100 vs 52/100). In the "camera" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra leads (93/100 vs 30/100). In the "battery" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra leads (80/100 vs 63/100). In the "performance" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra significantly outperforms the Vivo Y200 (China) (97/100 vs 52/100). In the "display" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra is a bit better (89/100 vs 79/100). In the "camera" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra significantly outperforms the Vivo Y200 (China) (93/100 vs 30/100). In the "battery" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra notably outperforms the Vivo Y200 (China) (80/100 vs 63/100). In the "portability" category, the Vivo Y200 (China) notably outperforms the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (67/100 vs 40/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Vivo Y200 (China) | Xiaomi 17 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | |
| AnTuTu | 737054 | 3667711 | |
| Geekbench Single | 930 | 3639 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2700 | 11047 | |
| Display | 6.8" AMOLED | 6.8" LTPO AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2400 | 3200x1440 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 6000 mAh | 6000 mAh | |
| Charging | 80W | 90W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 50W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 166 | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 200 MP | |
| Front camera | 8 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB / 12GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB / 512GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 14, OriginOS 4 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 1300 nits | 3500 nits | |
| NFC | no | yes | |
| Protection | IP64 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 164.4×74.8×8.0 mm | 162.9×77.6×8.3 mm | |
| Weight | 187 g | 226 g | |
| Launch price | — | $999 |
Camera comparison
Vivo Y200 (China)
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Front: 8MP
Xiaomi 17 Ultra
- Main: 50MP f/1.63
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 200MP
- Front: 32MP
Display comparison
Vivo Y200 (China)
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Xiaomi 17 Ultra
- 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 3200x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Vivo Y200 (China)
- 6000 mAh
- Wired: 80W
- No wireless charging
Xiaomi 17 Ultra
- 6000 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 16:09 hrs, total 33:23 hrs
- Wired: 90W
- Wireless: 50W
Overall performance score
We compared Vivo Y200 (China) and Xiaomi 17 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Xiaomi 17 Ultra leads Vivo Y200 (China) by 79.9% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Vivo Y200 (China)
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra significantly outperforms the Vivo Y200 (China) (97/100 vs 52/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra is a bit better (89/100 vs 79/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra significantly outperforms the Vivo Y200 (China) (93/100 vs 30/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra notably outperforms the Vivo Y200 (China) (80/100 vs 63/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Vivo Y200 (China) notably outperforms the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (67/100 vs 40/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Vivo Y200 (China) or the Xiaomi 17 Ultra?
The Xiaomi 17 Ultra significantly outperforms the Vivo Y200 (China) by 36 points (89/100 vs 53/100).
What is the rating of the Vivo Y200 (China) and the Xiaomi 17 Ultra?
The Vivo Y200 (China) has a MobileRank rating of 53/100, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra — 89/100.
Which has the better camera: the Vivo Y200 (China) or the Xiaomi 17 Ultra?
The Xiaomi 17 Ultra leads on camera score (93/100 vs 30/100).
Which is more powerful: the Vivo Y200 (China) or the Xiaomi 17 Ultra?
The Xiaomi 17 Ultra leads on performance (97/100 vs 52/100).
Should you choose the Vivo Y200 (China) over the Xiaomi 17 Ultra?
The Xiaomi 17 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.