Vivo Y200 (Asia) vs Vivo Y32t
The Vivo Y200 (Asia) (2024) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2, while the Vivo Y32t (2022) runs on the MediaTek Helio P70 (). By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo Y200 (Asia) leads — 34/100 vs 11/100 (a 23-point difference). Key differences: the main camera is 50 MP vs 13 MP.
Vivo Y200 (Asia)
Vivo Y32t
- Better main camera: 50MP vs 13MP
- Better camera (37/100 vs 0/100)
- Longer battery life (51/100 vs 36/100)
- Better display (100/100 vs 0/100)
- Lighter: 179g vs 188g
- Better design/ergonomics (76/100 vs 65/100)
Comparing the Vivo Y200 (Asia) vs the Vivo Y32t, the Vivo Y200 (Asia) scores 23 points higher (34/100 vs 11/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo Y200 (Asia) leads (37/100 vs 0/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo Y200 (Asia) leads (51/100 vs 36/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100. In the "display" category, the Vivo Y200 (Asia) significantly outperforms the Vivo Y32t (100/100 vs 0/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo Y200 (Asia) significantly outperforms the Vivo Y32t (37/100 vs 0/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo Y200 (Asia) notably outperforms the Vivo Y32t (51/100 vs 36/100). In the "design" category, the Vivo Y32t is a bit better (76/100 vs 65/100). In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
| Specification | Vivo Y200 (Asia) | Vivo Y32t | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 | MediaTek Helio P70 () | |
| AnTuTu | 560863 | — | |
| Geekbench Single | 923 | — | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2249 | — | |
| Display | 6.7" AMOLED | 6.5" LCD IPS | |
| Resolution | 1080x2400 | 720x1600 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | — | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 80W | — | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 13 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 8 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 8 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB / 12GB | — | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 128GB / 256GB | |
| OS | Android 14, Funtouch 14 | Android 11 Red Velvet Cake | |
| Brightness (peak) | 1800 nits | — | |
| NFC | no | no | |
| Protection | IP64 | — | |
| Dimensions | 163.2×75.9×7.8 mm | 164.0×75.2×8.3 mm | |
| Weight | 188 g | 179 g | |
| Price | — | — |
Vivo Y200 (Asia)
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 32MP
Vivo Y32t
- Main: 13MP
- Front: 8MP
Vivo Y200 (Asia)
- 6.7" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo Y32t
- 6.5" LCD IPS
- Resolution: 720x1600
- Refresh rate: —
Vivo Y200 (Asia)
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 80W
- No wireless charging
Vivo Y32t
- 5000 mAh
- No wireless charging
performance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100.
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo Y200 (Asia) significantly outperforms the Vivo Y32t (100/100 vs 0/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo Y200 (Asia) significantly outperforms the Vivo Y32t (37/100 vs 0/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo Y200 (Asia) notably outperforms the Vivo Y32t (51/100 vs 36/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Vivo Y32t is a bit better (76/100 vs 65/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
Which is better: the Vivo Y200 (Asia) or the Vivo Y32t?
The Vivo Y200 (Asia) significantly outperforms the Vivo Y32t by 23 points (34/100 vs 11/100).
What is the rating of the Vivo Y200 (Asia) and the Vivo Y32t?
The Vivo Y200 (Asia) has a MobileRank rating of 34/100, the Vivo Y32t — 11/100.
Which has the better camera: the Vivo Y200 (Asia) or the Vivo Y32t?
The Vivo Y200 (Asia) leads on camera score (37/100 vs 0/100).
Should you choose the Vivo Y200 (Asia) over the Vivo Y32t?
The Vivo Y200 (Asia) is a better fit for everyday use. The Vivo Y32t is a better fit for everyday use.