Vivo Y05 vs ZTE Axon 30S
The Vivo Y05 (2026) runs on the Unisoc T7225, while the ZTE Axon 30S (2022) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G. By overall MobileRank rating, the ZTE Axon 30S leads — 54/100 vs 33/100 (a 21-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo Y05 has the bigger battery (6500 mAh vs 4200); the main camera is 8 MP vs 64 MP; the ZTE Axon 30S has NFC for contactless payments, the Vivo Y05 doesn't; the ZTE Axon 30S is noticeably lighter (189g vs 209g).
Vivo Y05
ZTE Axon 30S
- Bigger battery: 6500 vs 4200 mAh
- Longer battery life (53/100 vs 33/100)
- Better Geekbench Single: 1298 vs 580
- Better Geekbench Multi: 3520 vs 1750
- Faster charging: 55W vs 15W
- Better main camera: 64MP vs 8MP
- Lighter: 189g vs 209g
- Higher performance (61/100 vs 31/100)
- Better camera (43/100 vs 10/100)
- Better display (79/100 vs 55/100)
- Better portability (67/100 vs 49/100)
Comparing the Vivo Y05 vs the ZTE Axon 30S, the ZTE Axon 30S scores 21 points higher (54/100 vs 33/100). In the "performance" category, the ZTE Axon 30S leads (61/100 vs 31/100). In the "camera" category, the ZTE Axon 30S leads (43/100 vs 10/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo Y05 leads (53/100 vs 33/100). In the "performance" category, the ZTE Axon 30S significantly outperforms the Vivo Y05 (61/100 vs 31/100). In the "display" category, the ZTE Axon 30S notably outperforms the Vivo Y05 (79/100 vs 55/100). In the "camera" category, the ZTE Axon 30S significantly outperforms the Vivo Y05 (43/100 vs 10/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo Y05 notably outperforms the ZTE Axon 30S (53/100 vs 33/100). In the "portability" category, the ZTE Axon 30S notably outperforms the Vivo Y05 (67/100 vs 49/100).
| Specification | Vivo Y05 | ZTE Axon 30S | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Unisoc T7225 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G | |
| AnTuTu | — | 1010069 | |
| Geekbench Single | 580 | 1298 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 1750 | 3520 | |
| Display | 6.7" IPS LCD | 6.9" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 720x1600 | 1080x2460 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 6500 mAh | 4200 mAh | |
| Charging | 15W | 55W | |
| Main camera | 8 MP | 64 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 8 MP | |
| Front camera | 5 MP | 16 MP | |
| RAM | 4GB | 8GB / 12GB | |
| Storage | 64GB / 128GB | 128GB / 256GB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 12, MyOS 12 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 1200 nits | — | |
| NFC | no | yes | |
| Protection | IP65 | — | |
| Dimensions | 167.4×77.1×8.4 mm | 170.2×77.8×7.8 mm | |
| Weight | 209 g | 189 g | |
| Launch price | $90 | — |
Vivo Y05
- Main: 8MP f/2.0
- Front: 5MP
ZTE Axon 30S
- Main: 64MP f/f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 16MP
Vivo Y05
- 6.7" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 720x1600
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
ZTE Axon 30S
- 6.9" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2460
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo Y05
- 6500 mAh
- Wired: 15W
- No wireless charging
ZTE Axon 30S
- 4200 mAh
- Wired: 55W
- No wireless charging
ZTE Axon 30S
Price unknownperformance
In the "performance" category, the ZTE Axon 30S significantly outperforms the Vivo Y05 (61/100 vs 31/100).
display
In the "display" category, the ZTE Axon 30S notably outperforms the Vivo Y05 (79/100 vs 55/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the ZTE Axon 30S significantly outperforms the Vivo Y05 (43/100 vs 10/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo Y05 notably outperforms the ZTE Axon 30S (53/100 vs 33/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the ZTE Axon 30S notably outperforms the Vivo Y05 (67/100 vs 49/100).
Which is better: the Vivo Y05 or the ZTE Axon 30S?
The ZTE Axon 30S significantly outperforms the Vivo Y05 by 21 points (54/100 vs 33/100).
What is the rating of the Vivo Y05 and the ZTE Axon 30S?
The Vivo Y05 has a MobileRank rating of 33/100, the ZTE Axon 30S — 54/100.
Which has the better camera: the Vivo Y05 or the ZTE Axon 30S?
The ZTE Axon 30S leads on camera score (43/100 vs 10/100).
Which is more powerful: the Vivo Y05 or the ZTE Axon 30S?
The ZTE Axon 30S leads on performance (61/100 vs 31/100).
Should you choose the Vivo Y05 over the ZTE Axon 30S?
The Vivo Y05 is a better fit for everyday use. The ZTE Axon 30S is a better fit for active users.