Vivo Y03t vs Xiaomi 18 Pro
The Vivo Y03t (2024) runs on the Unisoc T612, while the Xiaomi 18 Pro (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 6. By overall MobileRank rating, the Xiaomi 18 Pro leads — 92/100 vs 30/100 (a 62-point difference). Key differences: the Xiaomi 18 Pro has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 5000); the Xiaomi 18 Pro has NFC for contactless payments, the Vivo Y03t doesn't; the Vivo Y03t is noticeably lighter (185g vs 203g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Vivo Y03t
Xiaomi 18 Pro
What makes Vivo Y03t better?
- Lighter: 185g vs 203g
- Better portability (63/100 vs 52/100)
What makes Xiaomi 18 Pro better?
- Better Geekbench Single: 4301 vs 360
- Better Geekbench Multi: 12490 vs 1250
- Bigger battery: 7000 vs 5000 mAh
- Faster charging: 100W vs 15W
- Higher refresh rate: 120Hz vs 90Hz
- Higher performance (100/100 vs 16/100)
- Longer battery life (87/100 vs 43/100)
- Better display (82/100 vs 44/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Vivo Y03t vs the Xiaomi 18 Pro, the Xiaomi 18 Pro scores 62 points higher (92/100 vs 30/100). In the "performance" category, the Xiaomi 18 Pro leads (100/100 vs 16/100). In the "battery" category, the Xiaomi 18 Pro leads (87/100 vs 43/100). In the "performance" category, the Xiaomi 18 Pro significantly outperforms the Vivo Y03t (100/100 vs 16/100). In the "display" category, the Xiaomi 18 Pro significantly outperforms the Vivo Y03t (82/100 vs 44/100). In the "battery" category, the Xiaomi 18 Pro significantly outperforms the Vivo Y03t (87/100 vs 43/100). In the "portability" category, the Vivo Y03t is a bit better (63/100 vs 52/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Vivo Y03t | Xiaomi 18 Pro | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Unisoc T612 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 6 | |
| AnTuTu | — | 4888150 | |
| Geekbench Single | 360 | 4301 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 1250 | 12490 | |
| Display | 6.6" IPS LCD | 6.4" LTPO AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 720x1612 | 1120x2436 | |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 7000 mAh | |
| Charging | 15W | 100W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 50W | |
| Main camera | — | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 200 MP | |
| Front camera | 5 MP | 50 MP | |
| RAM | 4GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 64GB / 128GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 14, Funtouch 14 | Android 17 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 528 nits | 4000 nits | |
| NFC | no | yes | |
| Protection | IP54 | IP68/IP69 | |
| Dimensions | 163.6×75.6×8.4 mm | 151.8×72.0×8.5 mm | |
| Weight | 185 g | 203 g | |
| Launch price | — | $845 |
Camera comparison
Vivo Y03t
- Main: —
- Front: 5MP
Xiaomi 18 Pro
- Main: 200MP f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 200MP
- Front: 50MP
Display comparison
Vivo Y03t
- 6.6" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 720x1612
- Refresh rate: 90 Hz
Xiaomi 18 Pro
- 6.4" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 1120x2436
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Vivo Y03t
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 15W
- No wireless charging
Xiaomi 18 Pro
- 7000 mAh
- Wired: 100W
- Wireless: 50W
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Vivo Y03t
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Xiaomi 18 Pro significantly outperforms the Vivo Y03t (100/100 vs 16/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Xiaomi 18 Pro significantly outperforms the Vivo Y03t (82/100 vs 44/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Xiaomi 18 Pro significantly outperforms the Vivo Y03t (87/100 vs 43/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Vivo Y03t is a bit better (63/100 vs 52/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Vivo Y03t or the Xiaomi 18 Pro?
The Xiaomi 18 Pro significantly outperforms the Vivo Y03t by 62 points (92/100 vs 30/100).
What is the rating of the Vivo Y03t and the Xiaomi 18 Pro?
The Vivo Y03t has a MobileRank rating of 30/100, the Xiaomi 18 Pro — 92/100.
Which is more powerful: the Vivo Y03t or the Xiaomi 18 Pro?
The Xiaomi 18 Pro leads on performance (100/100 vs 16/100).
Should you choose the Vivo Y03t over the Xiaomi 18 Pro?
The Xiaomi 18 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.