Vivo Y03t vs Xiaomi 18 Fold
The Vivo Y03t (2024) runs on the Unisoc T612, while the Xiaomi 18 Fold (2026) runs on the Xiaomi XRING O3. By overall MobileRank rating, the Xiaomi 18 Fold leads — 86/100 vs 30/100 (a 56-point difference). Key differences: the Xiaomi 18 Fold has the bigger battery (6000 mAh vs 5000); the Xiaomi 18 Fold has NFC for contactless payments, the Vivo Y03t doesn't; the Vivo Y03t is noticeably lighter (185g vs 219g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Vivo Y03t
Xiaomi 18 Fold
What makes Vivo Y03t better?
- Lighter: 185g vs 219g
- Overall rating 30/100
What makes Xiaomi 18 Fold better?
- Better Geekbench Single: 3715 vs 360
- Better Geekbench Multi: 14213 vs 1250
- Bigger battery: 6000 vs 5000 mAh
- Faster charging: 67W vs 15W
- Higher refresh rate: 120Hz vs 90Hz
- Higher performance (99/100 vs 16/100)
- Longer battery life (75/100 vs 43/100)
- Better display (79/100 vs 44/100)
- Better portability (64/100 vs 63/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Vivo Y03t vs the Xiaomi 18 Fold, the Xiaomi 18 Fold scores 56 points higher (86/100 vs 30/100). In the "performance" category, the Xiaomi 18 Fold leads (99/100 vs 16/100). In the "battery" category, the Xiaomi 18 Fold leads (75/100 vs 43/100). In the "performance" category, the Xiaomi 18 Fold significantly outperforms the Vivo Y03t (99/100 vs 16/100). In the "display" category, the Xiaomi 18 Fold significantly outperforms the Vivo Y03t (79/100 vs 44/100). In the "battery" category, the Xiaomi 18 Fold significantly outperforms the Vivo Y03t (75/100 vs 43/100). In the "portability" category, the Xiaomi 18 Fold and the Vivo Y03t are nearly equal (64/100 vs 63/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Vivo Y03t | Xiaomi 18 Fold | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Unisoc T612 | Xiaomi XRING O3 | |
| AnTuTu | — | 5228014 | |
| Geekbench Single | 360 | 3715 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 1250 | 14213 | |
| Display | 6.6" IPS LCD | 7.6" LTPO AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 720x1612 | 1672x2364 | |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 6000 mAh | |
| Charging | 15W | 67W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 50W | |
| Main camera | — | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 5 MP | 16 MP | |
| RAM | 4GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 64GB / 128GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 14, Funtouch 14 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 528 nits | 4000 nits | |
| NFC | no | yes | |
| Protection | IP54 | IP59 | |
| Dimensions | 163.6×75.6×8.4 mm | 159.7×145.1×5.0 mm | |
| Weight | 185 g | 219 g | |
| Launch price | — | $1639 |
Camera comparison
Vivo Y03t
- Main: —
- Front: 5MP
Xiaomi 18 Fold
- Main: 200MP f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 16MP
Display comparison
Vivo Y03t
- 6.6" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 720x1612
- Refresh rate: 90 Hz
Xiaomi 18 Fold
- 7.6" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 1672x2364
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Vivo Y03t
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 15W
- No wireless charging
Xiaomi 18 Fold
- 6000 mAh
- Wired: 67W
- Wireless: 50W
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Vivo Y03t
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Xiaomi 18 Fold significantly outperforms the Vivo Y03t (99/100 vs 16/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Xiaomi 18 Fold significantly outperforms the Vivo Y03t (79/100 vs 44/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Xiaomi 18 Fold significantly outperforms the Vivo Y03t (75/100 vs 43/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Xiaomi 18 Fold and the Vivo Y03t are nearly equal (64/100 vs 63/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Vivo Y03t or the Xiaomi 18 Fold?
The Xiaomi 18 Fold significantly outperforms the Vivo Y03t by 56 points (86/100 vs 30/100).
What is the rating of the Vivo Y03t and the Xiaomi 18 Fold?
The Vivo Y03t has a MobileRank rating of 30/100, the Xiaomi 18 Fold — 86/100.
Which is more powerful: the Vivo Y03t or the Xiaomi 18 Fold?
The Xiaomi 18 Fold leads on performance (99/100 vs 16/100).
Should you choose the Vivo Y03t over the Xiaomi 18 Fold?
The Xiaomi 18 Fold is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.