Vivo X300 Pro vs Vivo Y78 (China)
The Vivo X300 Pro (2025) runs on the Dimensity 9500, while the Vivo Y78 (China) (2023) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 7020. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Pro leads — 88/100 vs 47/100 (a 41-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Pro has the bigger battery (6510 mAh vs 5000); the main camera is 200 MP vs 50 MP; the Vivo X300 Pro is faster in AnTuTu (3,326,259 vs 644,203); the Vivo X300 Pro has NFC for contactless payments, the Vivo Y78 (China) doesn't; the Vivo Y78 (China) is noticeably lighter (190g vs 226g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Vivo X300 Pro
Vivo Y78 (China)
What makes Vivo X300 Pro better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3326259 vs 644203
- Better Geekbench Single: 3293 vs 912
- Better Geekbench Multi: 10243 vs 2244
- Bigger battery: 6510 vs 5000 mAh
- Faster charging: 90W vs 44W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Higher performance (94/100 vs 48/100)
- Better camera (96/100 vs 30/100)
- Longer battery life (81/100 vs 48/100)
- Better display (84/100 vs 66/100)
What makes Vivo Y78 (China) better?
- Lighter: 190g vs 226g
- Better portability (65/100 vs 43/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Vivo X300 Pro vs the Vivo Y78 (China), the Vivo X300 Pro scores 41 points higher (88/100 vs 47/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (94/100 vs 48/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (96/100 vs 30/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (81/100 vs 48/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Vivo Y78 (China) (94/100 vs 48/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the Vivo Y78 (China) (84/100 vs 66/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Vivo Y78 (China) (96/100 vs 30/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Vivo Y78 (China) (81/100 vs 48/100). In the "portability" category, the Vivo Y78 (China) notably outperforms the Vivo X300 Pro (65/100 vs 43/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Vivo X300 Pro | Vivo Y78 (China) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Dimensity 9500 | MediaTek Dimensity 7020 | |
| AnTuTu | 3326259 | 644203 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3293 | 912 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 10243 | 2244 | |
| Display | 6.8" AMOLED | 6.6" IPS LCD | |
| Resolution | 1260x2800 | 1080x2388 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 6510 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 90W | 44W | |
| Wireless charging | 40W | 0W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | 171 | — | |
| Main camera | 200 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 0 MP | |
| Telephoto | 50 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 8 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 8GB / 12GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | 128GB / 256GB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 13, OriginOS 3 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 4500 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | no | |
| Protection | IP68 | — | |
| Dimensions | 161.2×75.5×8.0 mm | 164.1×76.2×8.0 mm | |
| Weight | 226 g | 190 g | |
| Launch price | $899 | — |
Camera comparison
Vivo X300 Pro
- Main: 200MP f/1.57
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Vivo Y78 (China)
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Front: 8MP
Display comparison
Vivo X300 Pro
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1260x2800
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo Y78 (China)
- 6.6" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 1080x2388
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Vivo X300 Pro
- 6510 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 13:30 hrs, total 24:37 hrs
- Wired: 90W
- Wireless: 40W
Vivo Y78 (China)
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 44W
- No wireless charging
Overall performance score
We compared Vivo X300 Pro and Vivo Y78 (China), covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X300 Pro leads Vivo Y78 (China) by 416.3% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Vivo Y78 (China)
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Vivo Y78 (China) (94/100 vs 48/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the Vivo Y78 (China) (84/100 vs 66/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Vivo Y78 (China) (96/100 vs 30/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Vivo Y78 (China) (81/100 vs 48/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Vivo Y78 (China) notably outperforms the Vivo X300 Pro (65/100 vs 43/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Vivo X300 Pro or the Vivo Y78 (China)?
The Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Vivo Y78 (China) by 41 points (88/100 vs 47/100).
What is the rating of the Vivo X300 Pro and the Vivo Y78 (China)?
The Vivo X300 Pro has a MobileRank rating of 88/100, the Vivo Y78 (China) — 47/100.
Which has the better camera: the Vivo X300 Pro or the Vivo Y78 (China)?
The Vivo X300 Pro leads on camera score (96/100 vs 30/100).
Which is more powerful: the Vivo X300 Pro or the Vivo Y78 (China)?
The Vivo X300 Pro leads on performance (94/100 vs 48/100).
Should you choose the Vivo X300 Pro over the Vivo Y78 (China)?
The Vivo X300 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.