Vivo X200 Ultra vs ZTE Axon 40

The Vivo X200 Ultra (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, while the ZTE Axon 40 (2022) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 870. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X200 Ultra leads — 86/100 vs 58/100 (a 28-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X200 Ultra has the bigger battery (6000 mAh vs 5000); the main camera is 50 MP vs 64 MP; the Vivo X200 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (3,092,340 vs 1,010,069); the ZTE Axon 40 is noticeably lighter (200g vs 229g).

The Vivo X200 Ultra significantly outperforms the ZTE Axon 40 by 28 points (86/100 vs 58/100).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Vivo X200 Ultra
Performance 92
Display 89
Camera 93
Battery 78
Portability 34
Value for money 84
ZTE Axon 40
Performance 61
Display 73
Camera 51
Battery 52
Portability 53
Value for money
What makes Vivo X200 Ultra better?
  • Higher AnTuTu: 3092340 vs 1010069
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3100 vs 1298
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 10095 vs 3520
  • Bigger battery: 6000 vs 5000 mAh

  • Higher performance (92/100 vs 61/100)
  • Better camera (93/100 vs 51/100)
  • Longer battery life (78/100 vs 52/100)
  • Better display (89/100 vs 73/100)
What makes ZTE Axon 40 better?
  • Better main camera: 64MP vs 50MP
  • Lighter: 200g vs 229g

  • Better portability (53/100 vs 34/100)
Comparison verdict

Comparing the Vivo X200 Ultra vs the ZTE Axon 40, the Vivo X200 Ultra scores 28 points higher (86/100 vs 58/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra leads (92/100 vs 61/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra leads (93/100 vs 51/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra leads (78/100 vs 52/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra significantly outperforms the ZTE Axon 40 (92/100 vs 61/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra notably outperforms the ZTE Axon 40 (89/100 vs 73/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra significantly outperforms the ZTE Axon 40 (93/100 vs 51/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra notably outperforms the ZTE Axon 40 (78/100 vs 52/100). In the "portability" category, the ZTE Axon 40 notably outperforms the Vivo X200 Ultra (53/100 vs 34/100).

Vivo X200 Ultra: The Vivo X200 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.
ZTE Axon 40: The ZTE Axon 40 is a better fit for active users.
Specs comparison
Specification Vivo X200 Ultra ZTE Axon 40
Processor Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Qualcomm Snapdragon 870
AnTuTu 3092340 1010069
Geekbench Single 3100 1298
Geekbench Multi 10095 3520
Display 6.8" LTPO AMOLED 6.7"
Resolution 3168x1440 1080x2400
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 6000 mAh 5000 mAh
Charging 90W
Wireless charging 40W 0W
DXOMark (camera) 167
Main camera 50 MP 64 MP
Ultrawide 50 MP 8 MP
Telephoto 200 MP 0 MP
Front camera 50 MP 44 MP
RAM 12GB / 16GB
Storage 256GB / 512GB / 1TB 128GB
OS Android 15 / OriginOS 5 Android 12 Snow Cone
Brightness (peak) 4500 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP68
Dimensions 163.1×76.8×8.7 mm 163.4×75.9×8.6 mm
Weight 229 g 200 g
Launch price $889
Camera comparison
Vivo X200 Ultra
  • Main: 50MP f/f/1.7
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 200MP
  • Front: 50MP
93
camera
ZTE Axon 40
  • Main: 64MP
  • Ultrawide: 8MP
  • Front: 44MP
51
camera
Display comparison
Vivo X200 Ultra
  • 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
  • Resolution: 3168x1440
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
89
display
ZTE Axon 40
  • 6.7"
  • Resolution: 1080x2400
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
73
display
Battery and charging
Vivo X200 Ultra
  • 6000 mAh
  • NanoReview test: web browsing 12:14 hrs, total 24:25 hrs
  • Wired: 90W
  • Wireless: 40W
78
battery
ZTE Axon 40
  • 5000 mAh
  • No wireless charging
52
battery
Overall performance score

We compared Vivo X200 Ultra and ZTE Axon 40, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Vivo X200 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
86/100
3092340 AnTuTu
ZTE Axon 40 Qualcomm Snapdragon 870
58/100 -206.2%
1010069 AnTuTu

Vivo X200 Ultra leads ZTE Axon 40 by 206.2% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Vivo X200 Ultra
$889
ZTE Axon 40
Price unknown
Detailed category analysis
performance

In the "performance" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra significantly outperforms the ZTE Axon 40 (92/100 vs 61/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra notably outperforms the ZTE Axon 40 (89/100 vs 73/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra significantly outperforms the ZTE Axon 40 (93/100 vs 51/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra notably outperforms the ZTE Axon 40 (78/100 vs 52/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the ZTE Axon 40 notably outperforms the Vivo X200 Ultra (53/100 vs 34/100).

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Vivo X200 Ultra or the ZTE Axon 40?

The Vivo X200 Ultra significantly outperforms the ZTE Axon 40 by 28 points (86/100 vs 58/100).

What is the rating of the Vivo X200 Ultra and the ZTE Axon 40?

The Vivo X200 Ultra has a MobileRank rating of 86/100, the ZTE Axon 40 — 58/100.

Which has the better camera: the Vivo X200 Ultra or the ZTE Axon 40?

The Vivo X200 Ultra leads on camera score (93/100 vs 51/100).

Which is more powerful: the Vivo X200 Ultra or the ZTE Axon 40?

The Vivo X200 Ultra leads on performance (92/100 vs 61/100).

Should you choose the Vivo X200 Ultra over the ZTE Axon 40?

The Vivo X200 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers. The ZTE Axon 40 is a better fit for active users.