Vivo S60 Vitality vs ZTE Axon 30S
The Vivo S60 Vitality (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 7500, while the ZTE Axon 30S (2022) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo S60 Vitality leads — 62/100 vs 54/100 (a 8-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo S60 Vitality has the bigger battery (7200 mAh vs 4200); the main camera is 50 MP vs 64 MP; the Vivo S60 Vitality is faster in AnTuTu (1,176,492 vs 1,010,069).
Vivo S60 Vitality
ZTE Axon 30S
- Higher AnTuTu: 1176492 vs 1010069
- Better Geekbench Multi: 3783 vs 3520
- Bigger battery: 7200 vs 4200 mAh
- Faster charging: 90W vs 55W
- Higher performance (62/100 vs 61/100)
- Better camera (44/100 vs 43/100)
- Longer battery life (70/100 vs 33/100)
- Better display (85/100 vs 79/100)
- Better Geekbench Single: 1298 vs 1130
- Better main camera: 64MP vs 50MP
- Lighter: 189g vs 199g
- Better portability (67/100 vs 60/100)
Comparing the Vivo S60 Vitality vs the ZTE Axon 30S, the Vivo S60 Vitality scores 8 points higher (62/100 vs 54/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo S60 Vitality leads (70/100 vs 33/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo S60 Vitality and the ZTE Axon 30S are nearly equal (62/100 vs 61/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo S60 Vitality is a bit better (85/100 vs 79/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo S60 Vitality and the ZTE Axon 30S are nearly equal (44/100 vs 43/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo S60 Vitality significantly outperforms the ZTE Axon 30S (70/100 vs 33/100). In the "portability" category, the ZTE Axon 30S is a bit better (67/100 vs 60/100).
| Specification | Vivo S60 Vitality | ZTE Axon 30S | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 7500 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G | |
| AnTuTu | 1176492 | 1010069 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1130 | 1298 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 3783 | 3520 | |
| Display | 6.6" AMOLED | 6.9" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1260x2750 | 1080x2460 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 7200 mAh | 4200 mAh | |
| Charging | 90W | 55W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 64 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 8 MP | 8 MP | |
| Front camera | 50 MP | 16 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB / 12GB | 8GB / 12GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB / 512GB | 128GB / 256GB | |
| OS | Android 16, OriginOS 6 | Android 12, MyOS 12 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 5000 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68 | — | |
| Dimensions | 157.5×74.3×7.9 mm | 170.2×77.8×7.8 mm | |
| Weight | 199 g | 189 g | |
| Launch price | — | — |
Vivo S60 Vitality
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.9
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 50MP
ZTE Axon 30S
- Main: 64MP f/f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 16MP
Vivo S60 Vitality
- 6.6" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1260x2750
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
ZTE Axon 30S
- 6.9" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2460
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo S60 Vitality
- 7200 mAh
- Wired: 90W
- No wireless charging
ZTE Axon 30S
- 4200 mAh
- Wired: 55W
- No wireless charging
We compared Vivo S60 Vitality and ZTE Axon 30S, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo S60 Vitality leads ZTE Axon 30S by 16.5% in our overall performance rating.
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo S60 Vitality and the ZTE Axon 30S are nearly equal (62/100 vs 61/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo S60 Vitality is a bit better (85/100 vs 79/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo S60 Vitality and the ZTE Axon 30S are nearly equal (44/100 vs 43/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo S60 Vitality significantly outperforms the ZTE Axon 30S (70/100 vs 33/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the ZTE Axon 30S is a bit better (67/100 vs 60/100).
Which is better: the Vivo S60 Vitality or the ZTE Axon 30S?
The Vivo S60 Vitality edges out the ZTE Axon 30S by just 8 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Vivo S60 Vitality and the ZTE Axon 30S?
The Vivo S60 Vitality has a MobileRank rating of 62/100, the ZTE Axon 30S — 54/100.
Should you choose the Vivo S60 Vitality over the ZTE Axon 30S?
The Vivo S60 Vitality is a better fit for active users. The ZTE Axon 30S is a better fit for active users.