Vivo S2 vs Vivo X300 Pro
The Vivo S2 (2026) runs on the Dimensity 7360 Turbo, while the Vivo X300 Pro (2025) runs on the Dimensity 9500. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Pro leads — 87/100 vs 56/100 (a 31-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo S2 has the bigger battery (7050 mAh vs 6510); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Pro is faster in AnTuTu (3,258,010 vs 925,409).
Vivo S2
Vivo X300 Pro
- Bigger battery: 7050 vs 6510 mAh
- Overall rating 56/100
- Higher AnTuTu: 3258010 vs 925409
- Better Geekbench Single: 3228 vs 1025
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9553 vs 2882
- Faster charging: 90W vs 44W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Higher performance (93/100 vs 56/100)
- Better camera (96/100 vs 37/100)
- Longer battery life (81/100 vs 60/100)
Comparing the Vivo S2 vs the Vivo X300 Pro, the Vivo X300 Pro scores 31 points higher (87/100 vs 56/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (93/100 vs 56/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (96/100 vs 37/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (81/100 vs 60/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Vivo S2 (93/100 vs 56/100). In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 84/100. In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Vivo S2 (96/100 vs 37/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the Vivo S2 (81/100 vs 60/100).
| Specification | Vivo S2 | Vivo X300 Pro | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Dimensity 7360 Turbo | Dimensity 9500 | |
| AnTuTu | 925409 | 3258010 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1025 | 3228 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2882 | 9553 | |
| Display | 6.8" AMOLED | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1260x2800 | 1260x2800 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 7050 mAh | 6510 mAh | |
| Charging | 44W | 90W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 171 | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | — | 4500 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68/IP69 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | — | 161.2×75.5×8.0 mm | |
| Weight | — | 226 g | |
| Launch price | — | $899 |
Vivo S2
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Front: 32MP
Vivo X300 Pro
- Main: 200MP f/f/1.57
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Vivo S2
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1260x2800
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo X300 Pro
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1260x2800
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo S2
- 7050 mAh
- Wired: 44W
- No wireless charging
Vivo X300 Pro
- 6510 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 13:30 hrs, total 24:37 hrs
- Wired: 90W
- Wireless: 40W
We compared Vivo S2 and Vivo X300 Pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X300 Pro leads Vivo S2 by 71.6% in our overall performance rating.
Vivo S2
Price unknownperformance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Vivo S2 (93/100 vs 56/100).
display
In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 84/100.
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Vivo S2 (96/100 vs 37/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the Vivo S2 (81/100 vs 60/100).
Which is better: the Vivo S2 or the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Vivo S2 by 31 points (87/100 vs 56/100).
What is the rating of the Vivo S2 and the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo S2 has a MobileRank rating of 56/100, the Vivo X300 Pro — 87/100.
Which has the better camera: the Vivo S2 or the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro leads on camera score (96/100 vs 37/100).
Which is more powerful: the Vivo S2 or the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro leads on performance (93/100 vs 56/100).
Should you choose the Vivo S2 over the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo S2 is a better fit for everyday use. The Vivo X300 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.