Vivo S17 vs Xiaomi 15S Pro
The Vivo S17 (2023) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G, while the Xiaomi 15S Pro (2025) runs on the Xiaomi XRING O1. By overall MobileRank rating, the Xiaomi 15S Pro leads — 84/100 vs 56/100 (a 28-point difference). Key differences: the Xiaomi 15S Pro has the bigger battery (6100 mAh vs 4600); the Xiaomi 15S Pro is faster in AnTuTu (2,998,904 vs 820,210).
Vivo S17
Xiaomi 15S Pro
- Overall rating 56/100
- Higher AnTuTu: 2998904 vs 820210
- Better Geekbench Single: 2746 vs 1059
- Better Geekbench Multi: 8431 vs 3012
- Bigger battery: 6100 vs 4600 mAh
- Faster charging: 90W vs 80W
- Higher performance (89/100 vs 55/100)
- Better camera (78/100 vs 44/100)
- Longer battery life (77/100 vs 47/100)
- Better display (90/100 vs 84/100)
Comparing the Vivo S17 vs the Xiaomi 15S Pro, the Xiaomi 15S Pro scores 28 points higher (84/100 vs 56/100). In the "performance" category, the Xiaomi 15S Pro leads (89/100 vs 55/100). In the "camera" category, the Xiaomi 15S Pro leads (78/100 vs 44/100). In the "battery" category, the Xiaomi 15S Pro leads (77/100 vs 47/100). In the "performance" category, the Xiaomi 15S Pro significantly outperforms the Vivo S17 (89/100 vs 55/100). In the "display" category, the Xiaomi 15S Pro is a bit better (90/100 vs 84/100). In the "camera" category, the Xiaomi 15S Pro significantly outperforms the Vivo S17 (78/100 vs 44/100). In the "battery" category, the Xiaomi 15S Pro significantly outperforms the Vivo S17 (77/100 vs 47/100).
| Specification | Vivo S17 | Xiaomi 15S Pro | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G | Xiaomi XRING O1 | |
| AnTuTu | 820210 | 2998904 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1059 | 2746 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 3012 | 8431 | |
| Display | 6.8" AMOLED | 6.7" LTPO AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1260x2800 | 3200x1440 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 4600 mAh | 6100 mAh | |
| Charging | 80W | 90W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 8 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 50 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB / 12GB | 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 13, OriginOS 3 | Android 15 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 1300 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | — | |
| Dimensions | 164.2×74.4×7.5 mm | — | |
| Weight | 186 g | — | |
| Launch price | — | $760 |
Vivo S17
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.9
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 50MP
Xiaomi 15S Pro
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Vivo S17
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1260x2800
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Xiaomi 15S Pro
- 6.7" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 3200x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo S17
- 4600 mAh
- Wired: 80W
- No wireless charging
Xiaomi 15S Pro
- 6100 mAh
- Wired: 90W
- Wireless charging: no data
We compared Vivo S17 and Xiaomi 15S Pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Xiaomi 15S Pro leads Vivo S17 by 72.6% in our overall performance rating.
Vivo S17
Price unknownperformance
In the "performance" category, the Xiaomi 15S Pro significantly outperforms the Vivo S17 (89/100 vs 55/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Xiaomi 15S Pro is a bit better (90/100 vs 84/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Xiaomi 15S Pro significantly outperforms the Vivo S17 (78/100 vs 44/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Xiaomi 15S Pro significantly outperforms the Vivo S17 (77/100 vs 47/100).
Which is better: the Vivo S17 or the Xiaomi 15S Pro?
The Xiaomi 15S Pro significantly outperforms the Vivo S17 by 28 points (84/100 vs 56/100).
What is the rating of the Vivo S17 and the Xiaomi 15S Pro?
The Vivo S17 has a MobileRank rating of 56/100, the Xiaomi 15S Pro — 84/100.
Which has the better camera: the Vivo S17 or the Xiaomi 15S Pro?
The Xiaomi 15S Pro leads on camera score (78/100 vs 44/100).
Which is more powerful: the Vivo S17 or the Xiaomi 15S Pro?
The Xiaomi 15S Pro leads on performance (89/100 vs 55/100).
Should you choose the Vivo S17 over the Xiaomi 15S Pro?
The Vivo S17 is a better fit for everyday use. The Xiaomi 15S Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.