Vivo S16 vs ZTE Axon 41 5G
The Vivo S16 (2022) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, while the ZTE Axon 41 5G (2022) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 870. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo S16 leads — 59/100 vs 56/100 (a 3-point difference). Key differences: the ZTE Axon 41 5G has the bigger battery (5000 mAh vs 4600); the Vivo S16 is noticeably lighter (182g vs 203g).
Vivo S16
ZTE Axon 41 5G
- Higher refresh rate: 120Hz vs 90Hz
- Lighter: 182g vs 203g
- Better display (79/100 vs 67/100)
- Better portability (76/100 vs 41/100)
- Bigger battery: 5000 vs 4600 mAh
- Longer battery life (52/100 vs 44/100)
Comparing the Vivo S16 vs the ZTE Axon 41 5G, the Vivo S16 scores 3 points higher (59/100 vs 56/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 61/100. In the "display" category, the Vivo S16 is a bit better (79/100 vs 67/100). In the "camera" category, both devices are on the same level — 51/100. In the "battery" category, the ZTE Axon 41 5G is a bit better (52/100 vs 44/100). In the "portability" category, the Vivo S16 significantly outperforms the ZTE Axon 41 5G (76/100 vs 41/100).
| Specification | Vivo S16 | ZTE Axon 41 5G | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G | Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 | |
| AnTuTu | 1010069 | 1010069 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1298 | 1298 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 3520 | 3520 | |
| Display | 6.8" AMOLED | 6.7" Amoled | |
| Resolution | 1080x2400 | 1080x2400 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 90 Hz | |
| Battery | 4600 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 66W | — | |
| Main camera | 64 MP | 64 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 8 MP | 8 MP | |
| Front camera | 50 MP | 44 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB / 12GB | — | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB / 512GB | 128GB | |
| OS | Android 13, Origin OS 3 | Android 11 Red Velvet Cake | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Dimensions | 164.1×74.8×7.4 mm | 163.9×76.2×9.5 mm | |
| Weight | 182 g | 203 g | |
| Launch price | — | — |
Vivo S16
- Main: 64MP f/f/1.9
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 50MP
ZTE Axon 41 5G
- Main: 64MP
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 44MP
Vivo S16
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
ZTE Axon 41 5G
- 6.7" Amoled
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 90 Hz
Vivo S16
- 4600 mAh
- Wired: 66W
- No wireless charging
ZTE Axon 41 5G
- 5000 mAh
- No wireless charging
We compared Vivo S16 and ZTE Axon 41 5G, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Equal performance based on benchmark results.
performance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 61/100.
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo S16 is a bit better (79/100 vs 67/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, both devices are on the same level — 51/100.
battery
In the "battery" category, the ZTE Axon 41 5G is a bit better (52/100 vs 44/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Vivo S16 significantly outperforms the ZTE Axon 41 5G (76/100 vs 41/100).
Which is better: the Vivo S16 or the ZTE Axon 41 5G?
The Vivo S16 edges out the ZTE Axon 41 5G by just 3 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Vivo S16 and the ZTE Axon 41 5G?
The Vivo S16 has a MobileRank rating of 59/100, the ZTE Axon 41 5G — 56/100.
Should you choose the Vivo S16 over the ZTE Axon 41 5G?
The Vivo S16 is a better fit for active users. The ZTE Axon 41 5G is a better fit for active users.