Vivo S16 vs ZTE Axon 40 Ultra

The Vivo S16 (2022) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, while the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra (2022) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1. By overall MobileRank rating, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra leads — 70/100 vs 59/100 (a 11-point difference). Key differences: the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra has the bigger battery (5000 mAh vs 4600); the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (1,294,871 vs 1,010,069); the Vivo S16 is noticeably lighter (182g vs 204g).

The ZTE Axon 40 Ultra is noticeably better than the Vivo S16 — the overall rating gap is 11 points.

Profile comparison

Category scores

Vivo S16

Performance 61
Display 79
Camera 51
Battery 44
Portability 76
Value for money —

ZTE Axon 40 Ultra

Performance 68
Display 80
Camera 86
Battery 52
Portability 52
Value for money —

What makes Vivo S16 better?

  • Faster charging: 66W vs 65W
  • Lighter: 182g vs 204g

  • Better portability (76/100 vs 52/100)

What makes ZTE Axon 40 Ultra better?

  • Higher AnTuTu: 1294871 vs 1010069
  • Better Geekbench Single: 1662 vs 1298
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 4188 vs 3520
  • Bigger battery: 5000 vs 4600 mAh

  • Higher performance (68/100 vs 61/100)
  • Better camera (86/100 vs 51/100)
  • Longer battery life (52/100 vs 44/100)
  • Better display (80/100 vs 79/100)

Comparison verdict

Comparing the Vivo S16 vs the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra scores 11 points higher (70/100 vs 59/100). In the "camera" category, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra leads (86/100 vs 51/100). In the "performance" category, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra is a bit better (68/100 vs 61/100). In the "display" category, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra and the Vivo S16 are nearly equal (80/100 vs 79/100). In the "camera" category, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra significantly outperforms the Vivo S16 (86/100 vs 51/100). In the "battery" category, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra is a bit better (52/100 vs 44/100). In the "portability" category, the Vivo S16 notably outperforms the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra (76/100 vs 52/100).

Vivo S16: The Vivo S16 is a better fit for active users.
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra: The ZTE Axon 40 Ultra is a better fit for active users, mobile photography enthusiasts.

Specs comparison

Specification Vivo S16 ZTE Axon 40 Ultra
Processor Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
AnTuTu 1010069 1294871
Geekbench Single 1298 1662
Geekbench Multi 3520 4188
Display 6.8" AMOLED 6.8" AMOLED
Resolution 1080x2400 1116x2480
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 4600 mAh 5000 mAh
Charging 66W 65W
Main camera 64 MP 64 MP
Ultrawide 8 MP 64 MP
Telephoto 0 MP 64 MP
Front camera 50 MP 16 MP
RAM 8GB / 12GB 8GB / 12GB / 16GB
Storage 128GB / 256GB / 512GB 128GB / 256GB / 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 13, Origin OS 3 Android 12, MyOS 12
Brightness (peak) — 1500 nits
NFC yes yes
Dimensions 164.1×74.8×7.4 mm 163.3×73.6×8.4 mm
Weight 182 g 204 g
Launch price — —

Camera comparison

Vivo S16

  • Main: 64MP f/1.9
  • Ultrawide: 8MP
  • Front: 50MP
51
camera

ZTE Axon 40 Ultra

  • Main: 64MP f/1.6
  • Ultrawide: 64MP
  • Telephoto: 64MP
  • Front: 16MP
86
camera

Display comparison

Vivo S16

  • 6.8" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1080x2400
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
79
display

ZTE Axon 40 Ultra

  • 6.8" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1116x2480
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
80
display

Battery and charging

Vivo S16

  • 4600 mAh
  • Wired: 66W
  • No wireless charging
44
battery

ZTE Axon 40 Ultra

  • 5000 mAh
  • Wired: 65W
  • No wireless charging
52
battery

Overall performance score

We compared Vivo S16 and ZTE Axon 40 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Vivo S16 Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G
59/100
1010069 AnTuTu
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
70/100 +22.0%
1294871 AnTuTu

ZTE Axon 40 Ultra leads Vivo S16 by 22.0% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra is a bit better (68/100 vs 61/100).

display

In the "display" category, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra and the Vivo S16 are nearly equal (80/100 vs 79/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra significantly outperforms the Vivo S16 (86/100 vs 51/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra is a bit better (52/100 vs 44/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Vivo S16 notably outperforms the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra (76/100 vs 52/100).

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the Vivo S16 or the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra?

The ZTE Axon 40 Ultra is noticeably better than the Vivo S16 — the overall rating gap is 11 points.

What is the rating of the Vivo S16 and the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra?

The Vivo S16 has a MobileRank rating of 59/100, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra — 70/100.

Which has the better camera: the Vivo S16 or the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra?

The ZTE Axon 40 Ultra leads on camera score (86/100 vs 51/100).

Which is more powerful: the Vivo S16 or the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra?

The ZTE Axon 40 Ultra leads on performance (68/100 vs 61/100).

Should you choose the Vivo S16 over the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra?

The Vivo S16 is a better fit for active users. The ZTE Axon 40 Ultra is a better fit for active users, mobile photography enthusiasts.