Vivo iQOO Neo10 Pro+ (China) vs Xiaomi 17 Pro Max

The Vivo iQOO Neo10 Pro+ (China) (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, while the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5. By overall MobileRank rating, the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max leads — 88/100 vs 73/100 (a 15-point difference). Key differences: the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max has the bigger battery (7500 mAh vs 6800); the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max is faster in AnTuTu (3,998,145 vs 3,126,402).

The Xiaomi 17 Pro Max is noticeably better than the Vivo iQOO Neo10 Pro+ (China) — the overall rating gap is 15 points.

Profile comparison

Category scores

Vivo iQOO Neo10 Pro+ (China)

Performance 91
Display 99
Camera 35
Battery 75
Portability 50
Value for money —

Xiaomi 17 Pro Max

Performance 98
Display 81
Camera 87
Battery 89
Portability 48
Value for money 86

What makes Vivo iQOO Neo10 Pro+ (China) better?

  • Faster charging: 120W vs 100W
  • Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
  • Lighter: 212g vs 219g

  • Better display (99/100 vs 81/100)
  • Better portability (50/100 vs 48/100)

What makes Xiaomi 17 Pro Max better?

  • Higher AnTuTu: 3998145 vs 3126402
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3639 vs 3013
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 11047 vs 9287
  • Bigger battery: 7500 vs 6800 mAh

  • Higher performance (98/100 vs 91/100)
  • Better camera (87/100 vs 35/100)
  • Longer battery life (89/100 vs 75/100)

Comparison verdict

Comparing the Vivo iQOO Neo10 Pro+ (China) vs the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max, the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max scores 15 points higher (88/100 vs 73/100). In the "camera" category, the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max leads (87/100 vs 35/100). In the "battery" category, the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max leads (89/100 vs 75/100). In the "performance" category, the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max is a bit better (98/100 vs 91/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo10 Pro+ (China) notably outperforms the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max (99/100 vs 81/100). In the "camera" category, the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max significantly outperforms the Vivo iQOO Neo10 Pro+ (China) (87/100 vs 35/100). In the "battery" category, the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max is a bit better (89/100 vs 75/100). In the "portability" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo10 Pro+ (China) and the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max are nearly equal (50/100 vs 48/100).

Vivo iQOO Neo10 Pro+ (China): The Vivo iQOO Neo10 Pro+ (China) is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life.
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max: The Xiaomi 17 Pro Max is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.

Specs comparison

Specification Vivo iQOO Neo10 Pro+ (China) Xiaomi 17 Pro Max
Processor Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
AnTuTu 3126402 3998145
Geekbench Single 3013 3639
Geekbench Multi 9287 11047
Display 6.8" LTPO AMOLED 6.9" LTPO AMOLED
Resolution 1440x3168 1200x2608
Refresh rate 144 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 6800 mAh 7500 mAh
Charging 120W 100W
Wireless charging 0W 50W
DXOMark (camera) — 159
Main camera 50 MP 50 MP
Ultrawide 8 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 0 MP 50 MP
Front camera 16 MP 50 MP
RAM 12GB / 16GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 256GB / 512GB / 1TB 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 15, OriginOS 5 Android 16
Brightness (peak) 4500 nits 3500 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP65 IP68
Dimensions 163.8×76.6×8.2 mm 162.9×77.6×8.0 mm
Weight 212 g 219 g
Launch price — $999

Camera comparison

Vivo iQOO Neo10 Pro+ (China)

  • Main: 50MP f/1.9
  • Ultrawide: 8MP
  • Front: 16MP
35
camera

Xiaomi 17 Pro Max

  • Main: 50MP f/1.69
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 50MP
87
camera

Display comparison

Vivo iQOO Neo10 Pro+ (China)

  • 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1440x3168
  • Refresh rate: 144 Hz
99
display

Xiaomi 17 Pro Max

  • 6.9" LTPO AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1200x2608
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
81
display

Battery and charging

Vivo iQOO Neo10 Pro+ (China)

  • 6800 mAh
  • Wired: 120W
  • No wireless charging
75
battery

Xiaomi 17 Pro Max

  • 7500 mAh
  • NanoReview test: web browsing 16:28 hrs, total 36:26 hrs
  • Wired: 100W
  • Wireless: 50W
89
battery

Overall performance score

We compared Vivo iQOO Neo10 Pro+ (China) and Xiaomi 17 Pro Max, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Vivo iQOO Neo10 Pro+ (China) Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
73/100
3126402 AnTuTu
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
88/100 +21.8%
3998145 AnTuTu

Xiaomi 17 Pro Max leads Vivo iQOO Neo10 Pro+ (China) by 21.8% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks

Launch prices and where to check today's

Vivo iQOO Neo10 Pro+ (China)

Price unknown

Xiaomi 17 Pro Max

$999

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max is a bit better (98/100 vs 91/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo10 Pro+ (China) notably outperforms the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max (99/100 vs 81/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max significantly outperforms the Vivo iQOO Neo10 Pro+ (China) (87/100 vs 35/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max is a bit better (89/100 vs 75/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo10 Pro+ (China) and the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max are nearly equal (50/100 vs 48/100).

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the Vivo iQOO Neo10 Pro+ (China) or the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max?

The Xiaomi 17 Pro Max is noticeably better than the Vivo iQOO Neo10 Pro+ (China) — the overall rating gap is 15 points.

What is the rating of the Vivo iQOO Neo10 Pro+ (China) and the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max?

The Vivo iQOO Neo10 Pro+ (China) has a MobileRank rating of 73/100, the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max — 88/100.

Which has the better camera: the Vivo iQOO Neo10 Pro+ (China) or the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max?

The Xiaomi 17 Pro Max leads on camera score (87/100 vs 35/100).

Which is more powerful: the Vivo iQOO Neo10 Pro+ (China) or the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max?

The Xiaomi 17 Pro Max leads on performance (98/100 vs 91/100).

Should you choose the Vivo iQOO Neo10 Pro+ (China) over the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max?

The Vivo iQOO Neo10 Pro+ (China) is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life. The Xiaomi 17 Pro Max is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.