Vivo iQOO Neo 7 (China) vs Vivo X300 Pro
The Vivo iQOO Neo 7 (China) (2022) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 9000+, while the Vivo X300 Pro (2025) runs on the Dimensity 9500. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Pro leads — 88/100 vs 62/100 (a 26-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Pro has the bigger battery (6510 mAh vs 5000); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Pro is faster in AnTuTu (3,326,259 vs 1,540,240); the Vivo iQOO Neo 7 (China) is noticeably lighter (197g vs 226g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Vivo iQOO Neo 7 (China)
Vivo X300 Pro
What makes Vivo iQOO Neo 7 (China) better?
- Faster charging: 120W vs 90W
- Lighter: 197g vs 226g
- Better portability (55/100 vs 43/100)
What makes Vivo X300 Pro better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3326259 vs 1540240
- Better Geekbench Single: 3293 vs 1967
- Better Geekbench Multi: 10243 vs 5401
- Bigger battery: 6510 vs 5000 mAh
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Higher performance (94/100 vs 74/100)
- Better camera (96/100 vs 35/100)
- Longer battery life (81/100 vs 64/100)
- Better display (84/100 vs 79/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Vivo iQOO Neo 7 (China) vs the Vivo X300 Pro, the Vivo X300 Pro scores 26 points higher (88/100 vs 62/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (94/100 vs 74/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (96/100 vs 35/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (81/100 vs 64/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the Vivo iQOO Neo 7 (China) (94/100 vs 74/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Pro is a bit better (84/100 vs 79/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Vivo iQOO Neo 7 (China) (96/100 vs 35/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the Vivo iQOO Neo 7 (China) (81/100 vs 64/100). In the "portability" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 7 (China) is a bit better (55/100 vs 43/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Vivo iQOO Neo 7 (China) | Vivo X300 Pro | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 9000+ | Dimensity 9500 | |
| AnTuTu | 1540240 | 3326259 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1967 | 3293 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 5401 | 10243 | |
| Display | 6.8" AMOLED | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2400 | 1260x2800 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 6510 mAh | |
| Charging | 120W | 90W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 171 | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 8 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 16 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB / 12GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB / 512GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 13, Origin OS Ocean | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 1500 nits | 4500 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 164.8×76.9×8.5 mm | 161.2×75.5×8.0 mm | |
| Weight | 197 g | 226 g | |
| Launch price | — | $899 |
Camera comparison
Vivo iQOO Neo 7 (China)
- Main: 50MP f/1.9
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 16MP
Vivo X300 Pro
- Main: 200MP f/1.57
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Display comparison
Vivo iQOO Neo 7 (China)
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo X300 Pro
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1260x2800
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Vivo iQOO Neo 7 (China)
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 120W
- No wireless charging
Vivo X300 Pro
- 6510 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 13:30 hrs, total 24:37 hrs
- Wired: 90W
- Wireless: 40W
Overall performance score
We compared Vivo iQOO Neo 7 (China) and Vivo X300 Pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X300 Pro leads Vivo iQOO Neo 7 (China) by 53.7% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Vivo iQOO Neo 7 (China)
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the Vivo iQOO Neo 7 (China) (94/100 vs 74/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Pro is a bit better (84/100 vs 79/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Vivo iQOO Neo 7 (China) (96/100 vs 35/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the Vivo iQOO Neo 7 (China) (81/100 vs 64/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 7 (China) is a bit better (55/100 vs 43/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Vivo iQOO Neo 7 (China) or the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Vivo iQOO Neo 7 (China) by 26 points (88/100 vs 62/100).
What is the rating of the Vivo iQOO Neo 7 (China) and the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo iQOO Neo 7 (China) has a MobileRank rating of 62/100, the Vivo X300 Pro — 88/100.
Which has the better camera: the Vivo iQOO Neo 7 (China) or the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro leads on camera score (96/100 vs 35/100).
Which is more powerful: the Vivo iQOO Neo 7 (China) or the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro leads on performance (94/100 vs 74/100).
Should you choose the Vivo iQOO Neo 7 (China) over the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo iQOO Neo 7 (China) is a better fit for active users. The Vivo X300 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.