Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra vs Xiaomi 13

The Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 9500M, while the Xiaomi 13 (2023) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2; launch prices were $548 and $640. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra leads — 75/100 vs 69/100 (a 6-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra has the bigger battery (9100 mAh vs 4500); the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (3,579,952 vs 1,743,949); the Xiaomi 13 is noticeably lighter (189g vs 225g).

The Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra edges out the Xiaomi 13 by just 6 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.

Profile comparison

Category scores

Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra

Performance 95
Display 99
Camera 35
Battery 80
Portability 38
Value for money 68

Xiaomi 13

Performance 75
Display 81
Camera 65
Battery 57
Portability 66
Value for money 52

What makes Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra better?

  • Higher AnTuTu: 3579952 vs 1743949
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3293 vs 2004
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 10243 vs 5311
  • Bigger battery: 9100 vs 4500 mAh
  • Faster charging: 100W vs 67W
  • Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
  • Cheaper at launch: $548 vs $640

  • Higher performance (95/100 vs 75/100)
  • Longer battery life (80/100 vs 57/100)
  • Better display (99/100 vs 81/100)

What makes Xiaomi 13 better?

  • Lighter: 189g vs 225g

  • Better camera (65/100 vs 35/100)
  • Better portability (66/100 vs 38/100)

Comparison verdict

Comparing the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra vs the Xiaomi 13, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra scores 6 points higher (75/100 vs 69/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra leads (95/100 vs 75/100). In the "camera" category, the Xiaomi 13 leads (65/100 vs 35/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra leads (80/100 vs 57/100). Value score: Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra — 68/100, Xiaomi 13 — 52/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra notably outperforms the Xiaomi 13 (95/100 vs 75/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra notably outperforms the Xiaomi 13 (99/100 vs 81/100). In the "camera" category, the Xiaomi 13 significantly outperforms the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra (65/100 vs 35/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra notably outperforms the Xiaomi 13 (80/100 vs 57/100). In the "portability" category, the Xiaomi 13 notably outperforms the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra (66/100 vs 38/100).

Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra: The Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life.
Xiaomi 13: The Xiaomi 13 is a better fit for active users.

Specs comparison

Specification Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra Xiaomi 13
Processor MediaTek Dimensity 9500M Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
AnTuTu 3579952 1743949
Geekbench Single 3293 2004
Geekbench Multi 10243 5311
Display 6.8" LTPS AMOLED 6.4" AMOLED
Resolution 1440x3200 2400x1080
Refresh rate 144 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 9100 mAh 4500 mAh
Charging 100W 67W
Wireless charging 0W 50W
DXOMark (camera) — 130
Main camera 50 MP 50 MP
Ultrawide 8 MP 12 MP
Telephoto 0 MP 10 MP
Front camera 16 MP 32 MP
RAM 12GB / 16GB 8GB / 12GB
Storage 256GB / 512GB 128GB / 256GB
OS Android 16 / OriginOS 6 Android 13
Brightness (peak) 4500 nits 1900 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP68/IP69 IP68
Dimensions 163.4×75.9×8.6 mm 152.8×71.5×8.0 mm
Weight 225 g 189 g
Launch price $548 $640

Camera comparison

Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra

  • Main: 50MP f/1.88
  • Ultrawide: 8MP
  • Front: 16MP
35
camera

Xiaomi 13

  • Main: 50MP f/1.8
  • Ultrawide: 12MP
  • Telephoto: 10MP
  • Front: 32MP
65
camera

Display comparison

Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra

  • 6.8" LTPS AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1440x3200
  • Refresh rate: 144 Hz
99
display

Xiaomi 13

  • 6.4" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 2400x1080
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
81
display

Battery and charging

Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra

  • 9100 mAh
  • Wired: 100W
  • No wireless charging
80
battery

Xiaomi 13

  • 4500 mAh
  • Wired: 67W
  • Wireless: 50W
57
battery

Overall performance score

We compared Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra and Xiaomi 13, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra MediaTek Dimensity 9500M
75/100
3579952 AnTuTu
Xiaomi 13 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
69/100 -105.3%
1743949 AnTuTu

Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra leads Xiaomi 13 by 105.3% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks

Launch prices and where to check today's

Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra

$548

Xiaomi 13

$640

Launch price difference: $92. Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra was $92 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra notably outperforms the Xiaomi 13 (95/100 vs 75/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra notably outperforms the Xiaomi 13 (99/100 vs 81/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Xiaomi 13 significantly outperforms the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra (65/100 vs 35/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra notably outperforms the Xiaomi 13 (80/100 vs 57/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Xiaomi 13 notably outperforms the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra (66/100 vs 38/100).

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra or the Xiaomi 13?

The Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra edges out the Xiaomi 13 by just 6 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.

What is the rating of the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra and the Xiaomi 13?

The Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra has a MobileRank rating of 75/100, the Xiaomi 13 — 69/100.

Which has the better camera: the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra or the Xiaomi 13?

The Xiaomi 13 leads on camera score (65/100 vs 35/100).

Which is more powerful: the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra or the Xiaomi 13?

The Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra leads on performance (95/100 vs 75/100).

Should you choose the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra over the Xiaomi 13?

The Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life. The Xiaomi 13 is a better fit for active users.