Tecno Spark 50 5G vs Xiaomi 17 Ultra
The Tecno Spark 50 5G (2026) runs on the Dimensity 6300, while the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; launch prices were $179 and $999. By overall MobileRank rating, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra leads — 88/100 vs 47/100 (a 41-point difference). Key differences: the Tecno Spark 50 5G has the bigger battery (6500 mAh vs 6000); the Xiaomi 17 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (3,593,401 vs 524,785); the Tecno Spark 50 5G is noticeably lighter (195g vs 226g).
Tecno Spark 50 5G
Xiaomi 17 Ultra
- Bigger battery: 6500 vs 6000 mAh
- Lighter: 195g vs 226g
- Cheaper at launch: $179 vs $999
- Better portability (64/100 vs 40/100)
- Higher AnTuTu: 3593401 vs 524785
- Better Geekbench Single: 3640 vs 771
- Better Geekbench Multi: 11033 vs 1980
- Faster charging: 90W vs 45W
- Higher performance (96/100 vs 43/100)
- Better camera (93/100 vs 30/100)
- Longer battery life (80/100 vs 69/100)
- Better display (89/100 vs 55/100)
Comparing the Tecno Spark 50 5G vs the Xiaomi 17 Ultra, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra scores 41 points higher (88/100 vs 47/100). In the "performance" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra leads (96/100 vs 43/100). In the "camera" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra leads (93/100 vs 30/100). In the "battery" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra leads (80/100 vs 69/100). Value score: Tecno Spark 50 5G — 62/100, Xiaomi 17 Ultra — 88/100; it is biased by price level, so it should not be compared directly between devices at different prices. In the "performance" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra significantly outperforms the Tecno Spark 50 5G (96/100 vs 43/100). In the "display" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra significantly outperforms the Tecno Spark 50 5G (89/100 vs 55/100). In the "camera" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra significantly outperforms the Tecno Spark 50 5G (93/100 vs 30/100). In the "battery" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra is a bit better (80/100 vs 69/100). In the "portability" category, the Tecno Spark 50 5G notably outperforms the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (64/100 vs 40/100).
| Specification | Tecno Spark 50 5G | Xiaomi 17 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Dimensity 6300 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | |
| AnTuTu | 524785 | 3593401 | |
| Geekbench Single | 771 | 3640 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 1980 | 11033 | |
| Display | 6.8" IPS LCD | 6.8" LTPO AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 720x1600 | 3200x1440 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 6500 mAh | 6000 mAh | |
| Charging | 45W | 90W | |
| Wireless charging | — | 50W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 166 | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 200 MP | |
| Front camera | 8 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 4GB / 6GB / 8GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | — | 3500 nits | |
| NFC | — | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | — | 162.9×77.6×8.3 mm | |
| Weight | 195 g | 226 g | |
| Launch price | $179 | $999 |
Tecno Spark 50 5G
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Front: 8MP
Xiaomi 17 Ultra
- Main: 50MP f/1.63
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 200MP
- Front: 32MP
Tecno Spark 50 5G
- 6.8" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 720x1600
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Xiaomi 17 Ultra
- 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 3200x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Tecno Spark 50 5G
- 6500 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- Wireless charging: no data
Xiaomi 17 Ultra
- 6000 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 16:09 hrs, total 33:23 hrs
- Wired: 90W
- Wireless: 50W
We compared Tecno Spark 50 5G and Xiaomi 17 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Xiaomi 17 Ultra leads Tecno Spark 50 5G by 85.4% in our overall performance rating.
Launch price difference: $820. Tecno Spark 50 5G was $820 cheaper at launch.
performance
In the "performance" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra significantly outperforms the Tecno Spark 50 5G (96/100 vs 43/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra significantly outperforms the Tecno Spark 50 5G (89/100 vs 55/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra significantly outperforms the Tecno Spark 50 5G (93/100 vs 30/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra is a bit better (80/100 vs 69/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Tecno Spark 50 5G notably outperforms the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (64/100 vs 40/100).
Which is better: the Tecno Spark 50 5G or the Xiaomi 17 Ultra?
The Xiaomi 17 Ultra significantly outperforms the Tecno Spark 50 5G by 41 points (88/100 vs 47/100).
What is the rating of the Tecno Spark 50 5G and the Xiaomi 17 Ultra?
The Tecno Spark 50 5G has a MobileRank rating of 47/100, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra — 88/100.
Which has the better camera: the Tecno Spark 50 5G or the Xiaomi 17 Ultra?
The Xiaomi 17 Ultra leads on camera score (93/100 vs 30/100).
Which is more powerful: the Tecno Spark 50 5G or the Xiaomi 17 Ultra?
The Xiaomi 17 Ultra leads on performance (96/100 vs 43/100).
Should you choose the Tecno Spark 50 5G over the Xiaomi 17 Ultra?
The Tecno Spark 50 5G is a better fit for everyday use. The Xiaomi 17 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.