Tecno Spark 50 5G vs Xiaomi 17 Pro Max

The Tecno Spark 50 5G (2026) runs on the Dimensity 6300, while the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; launch prices were $179 and $999. By overall MobileRank rating, the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max leads — 90/100 vs 47/100 (a 43-point difference). Key differences: the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max has the bigger battery (7500 mAh vs 6500); the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max is faster in AnTuTu (3,998,145 vs 524,785); the Tecno Spark 50 5G is noticeably lighter (195g vs 219g).

The Xiaomi 17 Pro Max significantly outperforms the Tecno Spark 50 5G by 43 points (90/100 vs 47/100).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Tecno Spark 50 5G
Performance 43
Display 55
Camera 30
Battery 69
Portability 64
Value for money 62
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max
Performance 98
Display 91
Camera 87
Battery 89
Portability 48
Value for money 92
What makes Tecno Spark 50 5G better?
  • Lighter: 195g vs 219g
  • Cheaper at launch: $179 vs $999

  • Better portability (64/100 vs 48/100)
What makes Xiaomi 17 Pro Max better?
  • Higher AnTuTu: 3998145 vs 524785
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3640 vs 771
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 11033 vs 1980
  • Bigger battery: 7500 vs 6500 mAh
  • Faster charging: 100W vs 45W
  • Higher refresh rate: 2160Hz vs 120Hz

  • Higher performance (98/100 vs 43/100)
  • Better camera (87/100 vs 30/100)
  • Longer battery life (89/100 vs 69/100)
  • Better display (91/100 vs 55/100)
Comparison verdict

Comparing the Tecno Spark 50 5G vs the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max, the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max scores 43 points higher (90/100 vs 47/100). In the "performance" category, the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max leads (98/100 vs 43/100). In the "camera" category, the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max leads (87/100 vs 30/100). In the "battery" category, the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max leads (89/100 vs 69/100). Value score: Tecno Spark 50 5G — 62/100, Xiaomi 17 Pro Max — 92/100; it is biased by price level, so it should not be compared directly between devices at different prices. In the "performance" category, the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max significantly outperforms the Tecno Spark 50 5G (98/100 vs 43/100). In the "display" category, the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max significantly outperforms the Tecno Spark 50 5G (91/100 vs 55/100). In the "camera" category, the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max significantly outperforms the Tecno Spark 50 5G (87/100 vs 30/100). In the "battery" category, the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max notably outperforms the Tecno Spark 50 5G (89/100 vs 69/100). In the "portability" category, the Tecno Spark 50 5G notably outperforms the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max (64/100 vs 48/100).

Tecno Spark 50 5G: The Tecno Spark 50 5G is a better fit for everyday use.
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max: The Xiaomi 17 Pro Max is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.
Specs comparison
Specification Tecno Spark 50 5G Xiaomi 17 Pro Max
Processor Dimensity 6300 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
AnTuTu 524785 3998145
Geekbench Single 771 3640
Geekbench Multi 1980 11033
Display 6.8" IPS LCD 6.9" LTPO AMOLED
Resolution 720x1600 1200x2608
Refresh rate 120 Hz 2160 Hz
Battery 6500 mAh 7500 mAh
Charging 45W 100W
Wireless charging 50W
DXOMark (camera) 159
Main camera 50 MP 50 MP
Ultrawide 0 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 0 MP 50 MP
Front camera 8 MP 50 MP
RAM 4GB / 6GB / 8GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 128GB / 256GB 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 16 Android 16, HyperOS 3
Brightness (peak) 3500 nits
NFC yes
Protection IP68
Dimensions 162.9×77.6×8.0 mm
Weight 195 g 219 g
Launch price $179 $999
Camera comparison
Tecno Spark 50 5G
  • Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
  • Front: 8MP
30
camera
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max
  • Main: 50MP f/f/1.7
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 50MP
87
camera
Display comparison
Tecno Spark 50 5G
  • 6.8" IPS LCD
  • Resolution: 720x1600
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
55
display
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max
  • 6.9" LTPO AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1200x2608
  • Refresh rate: 2160 Hz
91
display
Battery and charging
Tecno Spark 50 5G
  • 6500 mAh
  • Wired: 45W
  • Wireless charging: no data
69
battery
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max
  • 7500 mAh
  • NanoReview test: web browsing 16:28 hrs, total 36:26 hrs
  • Wired: 100W
  • Wireless: 50W
89
battery
Overall performance score

We compared Tecno Spark 50 5G and Xiaomi 17 Pro Max, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Tecno Spark 50 5G Dimensity 6300
47/100
524785 AnTuTu
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
90/100 +86.9%
3998145 AnTuTu

Xiaomi 17 Pro Max leads Tecno Spark 50 5G by 86.9% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Tecno Spark 50 5G
$179
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max
$999

Launch price difference: $820. Tecno Spark 50 5G was $820 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis
performance

In the "performance" category, the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max significantly outperforms the Tecno Spark 50 5G (98/100 vs 43/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max significantly outperforms the Tecno Spark 50 5G (91/100 vs 55/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max significantly outperforms the Tecno Spark 50 5G (87/100 vs 30/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max notably outperforms the Tecno Spark 50 5G (89/100 vs 69/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Tecno Spark 50 5G notably outperforms the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max (64/100 vs 48/100).

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Tecno Spark 50 5G or the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max?

The Xiaomi 17 Pro Max significantly outperforms the Tecno Spark 50 5G by 43 points (90/100 vs 47/100).

What is the rating of the Tecno Spark 50 5G and the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max?

The Tecno Spark 50 5G has a MobileRank rating of 47/100, the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max — 90/100.

Which has the better camera: the Tecno Spark 50 5G or the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max?

The Xiaomi 17 Pro Max leads on camera score (87/100 vs 30/100).

Which is more powerful: the Tecno Spark 50 5G or the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max?

The Xiaomi 17 Pro Max leads on performance (98/100 vs 43/100).

Should you choose the Tecno Spark 50 5G over the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max?

The Tecno Spark 50 5G is a better fit for everyday use. The Xiaomi 17 Pro Max is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.