Tecno Spark 40 Pro+ vs Vivo X Fold6
The Tecno Spark 40 Pro+ (2025) runs on the MediaTek Helio G200 Ultimate, while the Vivo X Fold6 (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 9500; launch prices were $229 and $1900. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X Fold6 leads — 88/100 vs 52/100 (a 36-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X Fold6 has the bigger battery (6900 mAh vs 5200); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP.
Profile comparison
Category scores
Tecno Spark 40 Pro+
Vivo X Fold6
What makes Tecno Spark 40 Pro+ better?
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
- Cheaper at launch: $229 vs $1900
- Better display (93/100 vs 81/100)
What makes Vivo X Fold6 better?
- Better Geekbench Single: 3293 vs 750
- Better Geekbench Multi: 10243 vs 2100
- Bigger battery: 6900 vs 5200 mAh
- Faster charging: 80W vs 33W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Faster wireless charging: 50W vs 15W
- Higher performance (95/100 vs 39/100)
- Better camera (87/100 vs 37/100)
- Longer battery life (82/100 vs 58/100)
- Better portability (100/100 vs 94/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Tecno Spark 40 Pro+ vs the Vivo X Fold6, the Vivo X Fold6 scores 36 points higher (88/100 vs 52/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X Fold6 leads (95/100 vs 39/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X Fold6 leads (87/100 vs 37/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X Fold6 leads (82/100 vs 58/100). Value score: Tecno Spark 40 Pro+ — 58/100, Vivo X Fold6 — 84/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Vivo X Fold6 significantly outperforms the Tecno Spark 40 Pro+ (95/100 vs 39/100). In the "display" category, the Tecno Spark 40 Pro+ is a bit better (93/100 vs 81/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X Fold6 significantly outperforms the Tecno Spark 40 Pro+ (87/100 vs 37/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X Fold6 notably outperforms the Tecno Spark 40 Pro+ (82/100 vs 58/100). In the "portability" category, the Vivo X Fold6 is a bit better (100/100 vs 94/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Tecno Spark 40 Pro+ | Vivo X Fold6 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Helio G200 Ultimate | MediaTek Dimensity 9500 | |
| AnTuTu | — | 3455738 | |
| Geekbench Single | 750 | 3293 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2100 | 10243 | |
| Display | 6.8" AMOLED | 8.0" LTPO AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1224x2720 | 2480x2200 | |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5200 mAh | 6900 mAh | |
| Charging | 33W | 80W | |
| Wireless charging | 15W | 50W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 20 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB | 16GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB | 512GB | |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 15 | |
| Brightness (peak) | — | 5500 nits | |
| NFC | — | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | — | 159.7×142.3×4.3 mm | |
| Weight | 165 g | — | |
| Launch price | $229 | $1900 |
Camera comparison
Tecno Spark 40 Pro+
- Main: 50MP f/1.6
- Front: 32MP
Vivo X Fold6
- Main: 200MP f/1.75
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 20MP
Display comparison
Tecno Spark 40 Pro+
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1224x2720
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Vivo X Fold6
- 8.0" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 2480x2200
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Tecno Spark 40 Pro+
- 5200 mAh
- Wired: 33W
- Wireless: 15W
Vivo X Fold6
- 6900 mAh
- Wired: 80W
- Wireless: 50W
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $1671. Tecno Spark 40 Pro+ was $1671 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X Fold6 significantly outperforms the Tecno Spark 40 Pro+ (95/100 vs 39/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Tecno Spark 40 Pro+ is a bit better (93/100 vs 81/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X Fold6 significantly outperforms the Tecno Spark 40 Pro+ (87/100 vs 37/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X Fold6 notably outperforms the Tecno Spark 40 Pro+ (82/100 vs 58/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Vivo X Fold6 is a bit better (100/100 vs 94/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Tecno Spark 40 Pro+ or the Vivo X Fold6?
The Vivo X Fold6 significantly outperforms the Tecno Spark 40 Pro+ by 36 points (88/100 vs 52/100).
What is the rating of the Tecno Spark 40 Pro+ and the Vivo X Fold6?
The Tecno Spark 40 Pro+ has a MobileRank rating of 52/100, the Vivo X Fold6 — 88/100.
Which has the better camera: the Tecno Spark 40 Pro+ or the Vivo X Fold6?
The Vivo X Fold6 leads on camera score (87/100 vs 37/100).
Which is more powerful: the Tecno Spark 40 Pro+ or the Vivo X Fold6?
The Vivo X Fold6 leads on performance (95/100 vs 39/100).
Should you choose the Tecno Spark 40 Pro+ over the Vivo X Fold6?
The Vivo X Fold6 is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.