Tecno Pova 7 Ultra vs Vivo S16e
The Tecno Pova 7 Ultra (2025) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 8350 Ultimate, while the Vivo S16e (2022) runs on the Exynos 1080. By overall MobileRank rating, the Tecno Pova 7 Ultra leads — 65/100 vs 49/100 (a 16-point difference). Key differences: the Tecno Pova 7 Ultra has the bigger battery (6000 mAh vs 4600); the main camera is 108 MP vs 50 MP; the Vivo S16e is thinner (7.7mm vs 8.9mm).
Tecno Pova 7 Ultra
Vivo S16e
- Bigger battery: 6000 vs 4600 mAh
- Faster charging: 70W vs 66W
- Better main camera: 108MP vs 50MP
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
- Better camera (43/100 vs 32/100)
- Longer battery life (72/100 vs 44/100)
- Better display (94/100 vs 80/100)
- Better portability (70/100 vs 36/100)
Comparing the Tecno Pova 7 Ultra vs the Vivo S16e, the Tecno Pova 7 Ultra scores 16 points higher (65/100 vs 49/100). In the "camera" category, the Tecno Pova 7 Ultra leads (43/100 vs 32/100). In the "battery" category, the Tecno Pova 7 Ultra leads (72/100 vs 44/100). In the "display" category, the Tecno Pova 7 Ultra is a bit better (94/100 vs 80/100). In the "camera" category, the Tecno Pova 7 Ultra is a bit better (43/100 vs 32/100). In the "battery" category, the Tecno Pova 7 Ultra notably outperforms the Vivo S16e (72/100 vs 44/100). In the "portability" category, the Vivo S16e significantly outperforms the Tecno Pova 7 Ultra (70/100 vs 36/100).
| Specification | Tecno Pova 7 Ultra | Vivo S16e | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 8350 Ultimate | Exynos 1080 | |
| AnTuTu | 1700848 | — | |
| Geekbench Single | 1398 | — | |
| Geekbench Multi | 4313 | — | |
| Display | 6.7" AMOLED | 6.6" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1260x2800 | 1080x2400 | |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 6000 mAh | 4600 mAh | |
| Charging | 70W | 66W | |
| Wireless charging | 30W | 0W | |
| Main camera | 108 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 8 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 13 MP | 16 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB / 12GB | 8GB / 12GB | |
| Storage | 256GB | 128GB / 256GB | |
| OS | Android 15, HIOS 15 | Android 11, Origin OS Ocean | |
| Brightness (peak) | 4500 nits | 1300 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP64 | — | |
| Dimensions | 160.0×75.2×8.9 mm | 162.5×75.8×7.7 mm | |
| Weight | — | 187 g | |
| Price | — | — |
Tecno Pova 7 Ultra
- Main: 108MP
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 13MP
Vivo S16e
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Front: 16MP
Tecno Pova 7 Ultra
- 6.7" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1260x2800
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Vivo S16e
- 6.6" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Tecno Pova 7 Ultra
- 6000 mAh
- Wired: 70W
- Wireless: 30W
Vivo S16e
- 4600 mAh
- Wired: 66W
- No wireless charging
display
In the "display" category, the Tecno Pova 7 Ultra is a bit better (94/100 vs 80/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Tecno Pova 7 Ultra is a bit better (43/100 vs 32/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Tecno Pova 7 Ultra notably outperforms the Vivo S16e (72/100 vs 44/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Vivo S16e significantly outperforms the Tecno Pova 7 Ultra (70/100 vs 36/100).
Which is better: the Tecno Pova 7 Ultra or the Vivo S16e?
The Tecno Pova 7 Ultra is noticeably better than the Vivo S16e — the overall rating gap is 16 points.
What is the rating of the Tecno Pova 7 Ultra and the Vivo S16e?
The Tecno Pova 7 Ultra has a MobileRank rating of 65/100, the Vivo S16e — 49/100.
Which has the better camera: the Tecno Pova 7 Ultra or the Vivo S16e?
The Tecno Pova 7 Ultra leads on camera score (43/100 vs 32/100).
Should you choose the Tecno Pova 7 Ultra over the Vivo S16e?
The Tecno Pova 7 Ultra is a better fit for active users. The Vivo S16e is a better fit for everyday use.