Tecno Camon Slim vs Vivo iQOO Neo 11
The Tecno Camon Slim (2026) runs on the MediaTek Helio G200 Ultimate, while the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 leads — 76/100 vs 52/100 (a 24-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 has the bigger battery (7500 mAh vs 5600).
Tecno Camon Slim
Vivo iQOO Neo 11
- Better camera (37/100 vs 35/100)
- Better portability (100/100 vs 49/100)
- Better Geekbench Single: 3041 vs 750
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9494 vs 2100
- Bigger battery: 7500 vs 5600 mAh
- Faster charging: 120W vs 60W
- Higher performance (92/100 vs 39/100)
- Longer battery life (92/100 vs 58/100)
- Better display (99/100 vs 93/100)
Comparing the Tecno Camon Slim vs the Vivo iQOO Neo 11, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 scores 24 points higher (76/100 vs 52/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 leads (92/100 vs 39/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 leads (92/100 vs 58/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 significantly outperforms the Tecno Camon Slim (92/100 vs 39/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 is a bit better (99/100 vs 93/100). In the "camera" category, the Tecno Camon Slim and the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 are nearly equal (37/100 vs 35/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 significantly outperforms the Tecno Camon Slim (92/100 vs 58/100). In the "portability" category, the Tecno Camon Slim significantly outperforms the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 (100/100 vs 49/100).
| Specification | Tecno Camon Slim | Vivo iQOO Neo 11 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Helio G200 Ultimate | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | |
| AnTuTu | — | 3154662 | |
| Geekbench Single | 750 | 3041 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2100 | 9494 | |
| Display | 6.8" AMOLED | 6.8" LTPO AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1224x2720 | 1440x3168 | |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 144 Hz | |
| Battery | 5600 mAh | 7500 mAh | |
| Charging | 60W | 120W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 8 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 16 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 16, up to 3 major Android upgrades, HIOS 16.2 | Android 16 | |
| NFC | yes | — | |
| Protection | IP68 | — | |
| Dimensions | 162.8×77.7×6.4 mm | — | |
| Weight | — | 210 g | |
| Launch price | — | $400 |
Tecno Camon Slim
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Front: 32MP
Vivo iQOO Neo 11
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.9
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 16MP
Tecno Camon Slim
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1224x2720
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Vivo iQOO Neo 11
- 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 1440x3168
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Tecno Camon Slim
- 5600 mAh
- Wired: 60W
- No wireless charging
Vivo iQOO Neo 11
- 7500 mAh
- Wired: 120W
- Wireless charging: no data
Tecno Camon Slim
Price unknownperformance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 significantly outperforms the Tecno Camon Slim (92/100 vs 39/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 is a bit better (99/100 vs 93/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Tecno Camon Slim and the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 are nearly equal (37/100 vs 35/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 significantly outperforms the Tecno Camon Slim (92/100 vs 58/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Tecno Camon Slim significantly outperforms the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 (100/100 vs 49/100).
Which is better: the Tecno Camon Slim or the Vivo iQOO Neo 11?
The Vivo iQOO Neo 11 significantly outperforms the Tecno Camon Slim by 24 points (76/100 vs 52/100).
What is the rating of the Tecno Camon Slim and the Vivo iQOO Neo 11?
The Tecno Camon Slim has a MobileRank rating of 52/100, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 — 76/100.
Which is more powerful: the Tecno Camon Slim or the Vivo iQOO Neo 11?
The Vivo iQOO Neo 11 leads on performance (92/100 vs 39/100).
Should you choose the Tecno Camon Slim over the Vivo iQOO Neo 11?
The Tecno Camon Slim is a better fit for everyday use. The Vivo iQOO Neo 11 is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.