Tecno Camon iACE2X vs Vivo iQOO 16
The Tecno Camon iACE2X (2019) runs on the MediaTek Helio A22, while the Vivo iQOO 16 (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Extreme Gen 6. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo iQOO 16 leads — 89/100 vs 22/100 (a 67-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo iQOO 16 has the bigger battery (8400 mAh vs 3050); the Vivo iQOO 16 is faster in AnTuTu (5,498,720 vs 155,362); the Vivo iQOO 16 has NFC for contactless payments, the Tecno Camon iACE2X doesn't; the Tecno Camon iACE2X is noticeably lighter (150g vs 223g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Tecno Camon iACE2X
Vivo iQOO 16
What makes Tecno Camon iACE2X better?
- Lighter: 150g vs 223g
- Better portability (78/100 vs 42/100)
What makes Vivo iQOO 16 better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 5498720 vs 155362
- Better Geekbench Single: 4327 vs 300
- Better Geekbench Multi: 12873 vs 486
- Bigger battery: 8400 vs 3050 mAh
- Higher performance (100/100 vs 10/100)
- Longer battery life (90/100 vs 15/100)
- Better display (99/100 vs 42/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Tecno Camon iACE2X vs the Vivo iQOO 16, the Vivo iQOO 16 scores 67 points higher (89/100 vs 22/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 leads (100/100 vs 10/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 leads (90/100 vs 15/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 significantly outperforms the Tecno Camon iACE2X (100/100 vs 10/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 significantly outperforms the Tecno Camon iACE2X (99/100 vs 42/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 significantly outperforms the Tecno Camon iACE2X (90/100 vs 15/100). In the "portability" category, the Tecno Camon iACE2X significantly outperforms the Vivo iQOO 16 (78/100 vs 42/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Tecno Camon iACE2X | Vivo iQOO 16 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Helio A22 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Extreme Gen 6 | |
| AnTuTu | 155362 | 5498720 | |
| Geekbench Single | 300 | 4327 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 486 | 12873 | |
| Display | 5.5" IPS LCD | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 720x1440 | 1440x3168 | |
| Refresh rate | — | 165 Hz | |
| Battery | 3050 mAh | 8400 mAh | |
| Charging | — | 100W | |
| Wireless charging | — | 40W | |
| Main camera | — | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 8 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 3GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 32GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 8.1 (Oreo) | Android 17 | |
| Brightness (peak) | — | 6000 nits | |
| NFC | no | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP68/IP69 | |
| Dimensions | 148.3×71.9×8.5 mm | 163.8×76.9×8.3 mm | |
| Weight | 150 g | 223 g | |
| Launch price | — | $840 |
Camera comparison
Tecno Camon iACE2X
- Main: —
- Front: 8MP
Vivo iQOO 16
- Main: 50MP f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Display comparison
Tecno Camon iACE2X
- 5.5" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 720x1440
- Refresh rate: —
Vivo iQOO 16
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1440x3168
- Refresh rate: 165 Hz
Battery and charging
Tecno Camon iACE2X
- 3050 mAh
- Wireless charging: no data
Vivo iQOO 16
- 8400 mAh
- Wired: 100W
- Wireless: 40W
Overall performance score
We compared Tecno Camon iACE2X and Vivo iQOO 16, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo iQOO 16 leads Tecno Camon iACE2X by 97.2% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Tecno Camon iACE2X
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 significantly outperforms the Tecno Camon iACE2X (100/100 vs 10/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 significantly outperforms the Tecno Camon iACE2X (99/100 vs 42/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 significantly outperforms the Tecno Camon iACE2X (90/100 vs 15/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Tecno Camon iACE2X significantly outperforms the Vivo iQOO 16 (78/100 vs 42/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Tecno Camon iACE2X or the Vivo iQOO 16?
The Vivo iQOO 16 significantly outperforms the Tecno Camon iACE2X by 67 points (89/100 vs 22/100).
What is the rating of the Tecno Camon iACE2X and the Vivo iQOO 16?
The Tecno Camon iACE2X has a MobileRank rating of 22/100, the Vivo iQOO 16 — 89/100.
Which is more powerful: the Tecno Camon iACE2X or the Vivo iQOO 16?
The Vivo iQOO 16 leads on performance (100/100 vs 10/100).
Should you choose the Tecno Camon iACE2X over the Vivo iQOO 16?
The Vivo iQOO 16 is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.