Tecno Camon 50 Slim vs Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China)
The Tecno Camon 50 Slim (2026) runs on the MediaTek Helio G200 Ultimate, while the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) (2025) runs on the Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; launch prices were $220 and $892. By overall MobileRank rating, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) leads — 87/100 vs 53/100 (a 34-point difference). Key differences: the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) has the bigger battery (6800 mAh vs 5600); the Tecno Camon 50 Slim is noticeably lighter (175g vs 224g).
Tecno Camon 50 Slim
Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China)
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
- Lighter: 175g vs 224g
- Cheaper at launch: $220 vs $892
- Better display (93/100 vs 81/100)
- Better portability (84/100 vs 42/100)
- Better Geekbench Single: 3640 vs 750
- Better Geekbench Multi: 11033 vs 2100
- Bigger battery: 6800 vs 5600 mAh
- Faster charging: 90W vs 60W
- Higher performance (98/100 vs 39/100)
- Better camera (87/100 vs 37/100)
- Longer battery life (83/100 vs 68/100)
Comparing the Tecno Camon 50 Slim vs the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China), the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) scores 34 points higher (87/100 vs 53/100). In the "performance" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) leads (98/100 vs 39/100). In the "camera" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) leads (87/100 vs 37/100). In the "battery" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) leads (83/100 vs 68/100). Value score: Tecno Camon 50 Slim — 64/100, Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) — 86/100; it is biased by price level, so it should not be compared directly between devices at different prices. In the "performance" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) significantly outperforms the Tecno Camon 50 Slim (98/100 vs 39/100). In the "display" category, the Tecno Camon 50 Slim is a bit better (93/100 vs 81/100). In the "camera" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) significantly outperforms the Tecno Camon 50 Slim (87/100 vs 37/100). In the "battery" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) notably outperforms the Tecno Camon 50 Slim (83/100 vs 68/100). In the "portability" category, the Tecno Camon 50 Slim significantly outperforms the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) (84/100 vs 42/100).
| Specification | Tecno Camon 50 Slim | Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Helio G200 Ultimate | Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | |
| AnTuTu | — | 3942923 | |
| Geekbench Single | 750 | 3640 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2100 | 11033 | |
| Display | 6.8" AMOLED | 6.9" LTPO AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1224x2720 | 1200x2608 | |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5600 mAh | 6800 mAh | |
| Charging | 60W | 90W | |
| Wireless charging | — | 50W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 200 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 50 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB | 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 16 | |
| NFC | — | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP68/IP69 | |
| Dimensions | — | 162.9×77.6×8.3 mm | |
| Weight | 175 g | 224 g | |
| Launch price | $220 | $892 |
Tecno Camon 50 Slim
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Front: 32MP
Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China)
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 200MP
- Front: 50MP
Tecno Camon 50 Slim
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1224x2720
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China)
- 6.9" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 1200x2608
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Tecno Camon 50 Slim
- 5600 mAh
- Wired: 60W
- Wireless charging: no data
Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China)
- 6800 mAh
- Wired: 90W
- Wireless: 50W
Launch price difference: $672. Tecno Camon 50 Slim was $672 cheaper at launch.
performance
In the "performance" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) significantly outperforms the Tecno Camon 50 Slim (98/100 vs 39/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Tecno Camon 50 Slim is a bit better (93/100 vs 81/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) significantly outperforms the Tecno Camon 50 Slim (87/100 vs 37/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) notably outperforms the Tecno Camon 50 Slim (83/100 vs 68/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Tecno Camon 50 Slim significantly outperforms the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) (84/100 vs 42/100).
Which is better: the Tecno Camon 50 Slim or the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China)?
The Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) significantly outperforms the Tecno Camon 50 Slim by 34 points (87/100 vs 53/100).
What is the rating of the Tecno Camon 50 Slim and the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China)?
The Tecno Camon 50 Slim has a MobileRank rating of 53/100, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) — 87/100.
Which has the better camera: the Tecno Camon 50 Slim or the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China)?
The Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) leads on camera score (87/100 vs 37/100).
Which is more powerful: the Tecno Camon 50 Slim or the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China)?
The Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) leads on performance (98/100 vs 39/100).
Should you choose the Tecno Camon 50 Slim over the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China)?
The Tecno Camon 50 Slim is a better fit for everyday use. The Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.