Tecno Camon 50 Pro vs Vivo iQOO Z11
The Tecno Camon 50 Pro (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 7400 Ultimate, while the Vivo iQOO Z11 (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 8500; launch prices were $320 and $290. Both devices score the same overall rating of 65/100. Key differences: the Vivo iQOO Z11 has the bigger battery (9020 mAh vs 6500); the Vivo iQOO Z11 is faster in AnTuTu (2,120,347 vs 1,059,715).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Tecno Camon 50 Pro
Vivo iQOO Z11
What makes Tecno Camon 50 Pro better?
- Better camera (64/100 vs 32/100)
- Better display (92/100 vs 89/100)
- Better portability (64/100 vs 40/100)
What makes Vivo iQOO Z11 better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 2120347 vs 1059715
- Better Geekbench Single: 1555 vs 1061
- Better Geekbench Multi: 6405 vs 3185
- Bigger battery: 9020 vs 6500 mAh
- Faster charging: 90W vs 45W
- Higher refresh rate: 165Hz vs 144Hz
- Cheaper at launch: $290 vs $320
- Higher performance (77/100 vs 59/100)
- Longer battery life (78/100 vs 58/100)
Comparison verdict
The Tecno Camon 50 Pro and the Vivo iQOO Z11 received the same MobileRank rating — 65/100. In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO Z11 leads (77/100 vs 59/100). In the "camera" category, the Tecno Camon 50 Pro leads (64/100 vs 32/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO Z11 leads (78/100 vs 58/100). Value score: Tecno Camon 50 Pro — 66/100, Vivo iQOO Z11 — 70/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO Z11 notably outperforms the Tecno Camon 50 Pro (77/100 vs 59/100). In the "display" category, the Tecno Camon 50 Pro and the Vivo iQOO Z11 are nearly equal (92/100 vs 89/100). In the "camera" category, the Tecno Camon 50 Pro significantly outperforms the Vivo iQOO Z11 (64/100 vs 32/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO Z11 notably outperforms the Tecno Camon 50 Pro (78/100 vs 58/100). In the "portability" category, the Tecno Camon 50 Pro notably outperforms the Vivo iQOO Z11 (64/100 vs 40/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Tecno Camon 50 Pro | Vivo iQOO Z11 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 7400 Ultimate | MediaTek Dimensity 8500 | |
| AnTuTu | 1059715 | 2120347 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1061 | 1555 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 3185 | 6405 | |
| Display | 6.8" AMOLED | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1208x2644 | 1080x2400 | |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 165 Hz | |
| Battery | 6500 mAh | 9020 mAh | |
| Charging | 45W | 90W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 8 MP | 0 MP | |
| Telephoto | 50 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 50 MP | 16 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB / 12GB | 8GB / 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | Android 16, up to 3 major Android upgrades, HIOS 16 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | — | 5000 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 162.4×77.0×7.8 mm | 163.7×76.2×8.3 mm | |
| Weight | — | 228 g | |
| Launch price | $320 | $290 |
Camera comparison
Tecno Camon 50 Pro
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 50MP
Vivo iQOO Z11
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Front: 16MP
Display comparison
Tecno Camon 50 Pro
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1208x2644
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Vivo iQOO Z11
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 165 Hz
Battery and charging
Tecno Camon 50 Pro
- 6500 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- No wireless charging
Vivo iQOO Z11
- 9020 mAh
- Wired: 90W
- No wireless charging
Overall performance score
We compared Tecno Camon 50 Pro and Vivo iQOO Z11, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo iQOO Z11 leads Tecno Camon 50 Pro by 50.0% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $30. Vivo iQOO Z11 was $30 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO Z11 notably outperforms the Tecno Camon 50 Pro (77/100 vs 59/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Tecno Camon 50 Pro and the Vivo iQOO Z11 are nearly equal (92/100 vs 89/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Tecno Camon 50 Pro significantly outperforms the Vivo iQOO Z11 (64/100 vs 32/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO Z11 notably outperforms the Tecno Camon 50 Pro (78/100 vs 58/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Tecno Camon 50 Pro notably outperforms the Vivo iQOO Z11 (64/100 vs 40/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Tecno Camon 50 Pro or the Vivo iQOO Z11?
Both devices scored 65/100. The choice depends on your priorities: if performance matters more — go with the Vivo iQOO Z11 (77/100 vs 59/100).
What is the rating of the Tecno Camon 50 Pro and the Vivo iQOO Z11?
The Tecno Camon 50 Pro has a MobileRank rating of 65/100, the Vivo iQOO Z11 — 65/100.
Which has the better camera: the Tecno Camon 50 Pro or the Vivo iQOO Z11?
The Tecno Camon 50 Pro leads on camera score (64/100 vs 32/100).
Which is more powerful: the Tecno Camon 50 Pro or the Vivo iQOO Z11?
The Vivo iQOO Z11 leads on performance (77/100 vs 59/100).
Should you choose the Tecno Camon 50 Pro over the Vivo iQOO Z11?
The Vivo iQOO Z11 is a better fit for active users, those who care about battery life.