Tecno Camon 50 Pro 4G vs Vivo iQOO 16
The Tecno Camon 50 Pro 4G (2026) runs on the MediaTek Helio G200 Ultimate, while the Vivo iQOO 16 (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Extreme Gen 6. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo iQOO 16 leads — 89/100 vs 57/100 (a 32-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo iQOO 16 has the bigger battery (8400 mAh vs 6150).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Tecno Camon 50 Pro 4G
Vivo iQOO 16
What makes Tecno Camon 50 Pro 4G better?
- Better portability (76/100 vs 42/100)
What makes Vivo iQOO 16 better?
- Better Geekbench Single: 4327 vs 750
- Better Geekbench Multi: 12873 vs 2100
- Bigger battery: 8400 vs 6150 mAh
- Faster charging: 100W vs 45W
- Higher refresh rate: 165Hz vs 144Hz
- Higher performance (100/100 vs 39/100)
- Better camera (78/100 vs 61/100)
- Longer battery life (90/100 vs 57/100)
- Better display (99/100 vs 92/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Tecno Camon 50 Pro 4G vs the Vivo iQOO 16, the Vivo iQOO 16 scores 32 points higher (89/100 vs 57/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 leads (100/100 vs 39/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 leads (78/100 vs 61/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 leads (90/100 vs 57/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 significantly outperforms the Tecno Camon 50 Pro 4G (100/100 vs 39/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 is a bit better (99/100 vs 92/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 notably outperforms the Tecno Camon 50 Pro 4G (78/100 vs 61/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 significantly outperforms the Tecno Camon 50 Pro 4G (90/100 vs 57/100). In the "portability" category, the Tecno Camon 50 Pro 4G significantly outperforms the Vivo iQOO 16 (76/100 vs 42/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Tecno Camon 50 Pro 4G | Vivo iQOO 16 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Helio G200 Ultimate | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Extreme Gen 6 | |
| AnTuTu | — | 5498720 | |
| Geekbench Single | 750 | 4327 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2100 | 12873 | |
| Display | 6.8" AMOLED | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1208x2644 | 1440x3168 | |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 165 Hz | |
| Battery | 6150 mAh | 8400 mAh | |
| Charging | 45W | 100W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 40W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 8 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 16, up to 3 major Android upgrades, HIOS 16 | Android 17 | |
| Brightness (peak) | — | 6000 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68 | IP68/IP69 | |
| Dimensions | 162.4×77.0×7.4 mm | 163.8×76.9×8.3 mm | |
| Weight | — | 223 g | |
| Launch price | — | $840 |
Camera comparison
Tecno Camon 50 Pro 4G
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Vivo iQOO 16
- Main: 50MP f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Display comparison
Tecno Camon 50 Pro 4G
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1208x2644
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Vivo iQOO 16
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1440x3168
- Refresh rate: 165 Hz
Battery and charging
Tecno Camon 50 Pro 4G
- 6150 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- No wireless charging
Vivo iQOO 16
- 8400 mAh
- Wired: 100W
- Wireless: 40W
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Tecno Camon 50 Pro 4G
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 significantly outperforms the Tecno Camon 50 Pro 4G (100/100 vs 39/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 is a bit better (99/100 vs 92/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 notably outperforms the Tecno Camon 50 Pro 4G (78/100 vs 61/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 significantly outperforms the Tecno Camon 50 Pro 4G (90/100 vs 57/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Tecno Camon 50 Pro 4G significantly outperforms the Vivo iQOO 16 (76/100 vs 42/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Tecno Camon 50 Pro 4G or the Vivo iQOO 16?
The Vivo iQOO 16 significantly outperforms the Tecno Camon 50 Pro 4G by 32 points (89/100 vs 57/100).
What is the rating of the Tecno Camon 50 Pro 4G and the Vivo iQOO 16?
The Tecno Camon 50 Pro 4G has a MobileRank rating of 57/100, the Vivo iQOO 16 — 89/100.
Which has the better camera: the Tecno Camon 50 Pro 4G or the Vivo iQOO 16?
The Vivo iQOO 16 leads on camera score (78/100 vs 61/100).
Which is more powerful: the Tecno Camon 50 Pro 4G or the Vivo iQOO 16?
The Vivo iQOO 16 leads on performance (100/100 vs 39/100).
Should you choose the Tecno Camon 50 Pro 4G over the Vivo iQOO 16?
The Vivo iQOO 16 is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.