Tecno Camon 40 vs Vivo iQOO Z7 Pro
The Tecno Camon 40 (2025) runs on the MediaTek Helio G100 Ultimate, while the Vivo iQOO Z7 Pro (2023) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 7200. Both devices score the same overall rating of 33/100. Key differences: the Tecno Camon 40 has the bigger battery (5200 mAh vs 4600); the main camera is 50 MP vs 64 MP; the Tecno Camon 40 has NFC for contactless payments, the Vivo iQOO Z7 Pro doesn't.
Tecno Camon 40
Vivo iQOO Z7 Pro
- Bigger battery: 5200 vs 4600 mAh
- Longer battery life (48/100 vs 37/100)
- Faster charging: 66W vs 45W
- Better main camera: 64MP vs 50MP
- Better design/ergonomics (81/100 vs 50/100)
The Tecno Camon 40 and the Vivo iQOO Z7 Pro received the same MobileRank rating — 33/100. In the "battery" category, the Tecno Camon 40 leads (48/100 vs 37/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100. In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100. In the "camera" category, both devices are on the same level — 37/100. In the "battery" category, the Tecno Camon 40 is a bit better (48/100 vs 37/100). In the "design" category, the Vivo iQOO Z7 Pro significantly outperforms the Tecno Camon 40 (81/100 vs 50/100). In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
| Specification | Tecno Camon 40 | Vivo iQOO Z7 Pro | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Helio G100 Ultimate | MediaTek Dimensity 7200 | |
| AnTuTu | 408000 | — | |
| Geekbench Single | 760 | — | |
| Geekbench Multi | 1890 | — | |
| Display | 6.8" AMOLED | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2436 | 1080x2400 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5200 mAh | 4600 mAh | |
| Charging | 45W | 66W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 64 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 8 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 16 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB | 8GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB | 128GB / 256GB | |
| OS | Android 15, HIOS 15 | Android 13, planned upgrade to Android 14, Funtouch 14 | |
| Brightness (peak) | — | 1300 nits | |
| NFC | yes | no | |
| Dimensions | 164.1×74.6×7.3 mm | 164.1×74.8×7.4 mm | |
| Weight | — | 175 g | |
| Price | — | — |
Tecno Camon 40
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.9
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 32MP
Vivo iQOO Z7 Pro
- Main: 64MP f/f/1.8
- Front: 16MP
Tecno Camon 40
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2436
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo iQOO Z7 Pro
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Tecno Camon 40
- 5200 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- No wireless charging
Vivo iQOO Z7 Pro
- 4600 mAh
- Wired: 66W
- No wireless charging
performance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100.
display
In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100.
camera
In the "camera" category, both devices are on the same level — 37/100.
battery
In the "battery" category, the Tecno Camon 40 is a bit better (48/100 vs 37/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Vivo iQOO Z7 Pro significantly outperforms the Tecno Camon 40 (81/100 vs 50/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
Which is better: the Tecno Camon 40 or the Vivo iQOO Z7 Pro?
Both devices scored 33/100. The choice depends on your priorities: if performance matters more — go with the Vivo iQOO Z7 Pro.
What is the rating of the Tecno Camon 40 and the Vivo iQOO Z7 Pro?
The Tecno Camon 40 has a MobileRank rating of 33/100, the Vivo iQOO Z7 Pro — 33/100.
Should you choose the Tecno Camon 40 over the Vivo iQOO Z7 Pro?
The Tecno Camon 40 is a better fit for everyday use. The Vivo iQOO Z7 Pro is a better fit for everyday use.