Sharp Aquos Sense10 vs Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China)

The Sharp Aquos Sense10 (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, while the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) (2025) runs on the Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5. By overall MobileRank rating, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) leads — 87/100 vs 62/100 (a 25-point difference). Key differences: the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) has the bigger battery (6800 mAh vs 5000); the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) is faster in AnTuTu (3,950,082 vs 1,041,899); the Sharp Aquos Sense10 is noticeably lighter (166g vs 224g).

The Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) significantly outperforms the Sharp Aquos Sense10 by 25 points (87/100 vs 62/100).

Profile comparison

Category scores

Sharp Aquos Sense10

Performance 60
Display 92
Camera 57
Battery 46
Portability 70
Value for money —

Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China)

Performance 98
Display 81
Camera 87
Battery 83
Portability 42
Value for money 88

What makes Sharp Aquos Sense10 better?

  • Higher refresh rate: 240Hz vs 120Hz
  • Lighter: 166g vs 224g

  • Better display (92/100 vs 81/100)
  • Better portability (70/100 vs 42/100)

What makes Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) better?

  • Higher AnTuTu: 3950082 vs 1041899
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3639 vs 1161
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 11047 vs 3390
  • Bigger battery: 6800 vs 5000 mAh
  • Faster charging: 90W vs 36W

  • Higher performance (98/100 vs 60/100)
  • Better camera (87/100 vs 57/100)
  • Longer battery life (83/100 vs 46/100)

Comparison verdict

Comparing the Sharp Aquos Sense10 vs the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China), the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) scores 25 points higher (87/100 vs 62/100). In the "performance" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) leads (98/100 vs 60/100). In the "camera" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) leads (87/100 vs 57/100). In the "battery" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) leads (83/100 vs 46/100). In the "performance" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) significantly outperforms the Sharp Aquos Sense10 (98/100 vs 60/100). In the "display" category, the Sharp Aquos Sense10 is a bit better (92/100 vs 81/100). In the "camera" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) significantly outperforms the Sharp Aquos Sense10 (87/100 vs 57/100). In the "battery" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) significantly outperforms the Sharp Aquos Sense10 (83/100 vs 46/100). In the "portability" category, the Sharp Aquos Sense10 notably outperforms the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) (70/100 vs 42/100).

Sharp Aquos Sense10: The Sharp Aquos Sense10 is a better fit for active users.
Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China): The Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.

Specs comparison

Specification Sharp Aquos Sense10 Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China)
Processor Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3 Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
AnTuTu 1041899 3950082
Geekbench Single 1161 3639
Geekbench Multi 3390 11047
Display 6.1" LTPO IGZO OLED 6.9" LTPO AMOLED
Resolution 1080x2340 1200x2608
Refresh rate 240 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 5000 mAh 6800 mAh
Charging 36W 90W
Wireless charging 0W 50W
Main camera 50 MP 50 MP
Ultrawide 50 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 0 MP 200 MP
Front camera 32 MP 50 MP
RAM 6GB / 8GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 128GB / 256GB 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 16 Android 16
Brightness (peak) 2000 nits —
NFC yes yes
Protection IP68 IP68/IP69
Dimensions 149.0×73.0×8.9 mm 162.9×77.6×8.3 mm
Weight 166 g 224 g
Launch price — $892

Camera comparison

Sharp Aquos Sense10

  • Main: 50MP
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Front: 32MP
57
camera

Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China)

  • Main: 50MP f/1.7
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 200MP
  • Front: 50MP
87
camera

Display comparison

Sharp Aquos Sense10

  • 6.1" LTPO IGZO OLED
  • Resolution: 1080x2340
  • Refresh rate: 240 Hz
92
display

Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China)

  • 6.9" LTPO AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1200x2608
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
81
display

Battery and charging

Sharp Aquos Sense10

  • 5000 mAh
  • Wired: 36W
  • No wireless charging
46
battery

Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China)

  • 6800 mAh
  • Wired: 90W
  • Wireless: 50W
83
battery

Overall performance score

We compared Sharp Aquos Sense10 and Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China), covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Sharp Aquos Sense10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3
62/100
1041899 AnTuTu
Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
87/100 +73.6%
3950082 AnTuTu

Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) leads Sharp Aquos Sense10 by 73.6% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks

Launch prices and where to check today's

Sharp Aquos Sense10

Price unknown

Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China)

$892

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) significantly outperforms the Sharp Aquos Sense10 (98/100 vs 60/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Sharp Aquos Sense10 is a bit better (92/100 vs 81/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) significantly outperforms the Sharp Aquos Sense10 (87/100 vs 57/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) significantly outperforms the Sharp Aquos Sense10 (83/100 vs 46/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Sharp Aquos Sense10 notably outperforms the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) (70/100 vs 42/100).

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the Sharp Aquos Sense10 or the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China)?

The Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) significantly outperforms the Sharp Aquos Sense10 by 25 points (87/100 vs 62/100).

What is the rating of the Sharp Aquos Sense10 and the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China)?

The Sharp Aquos Sense10 has a MobileRank rating of 62/100, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) — 87/100.

Which has the better camera: the Sharp Aquos Sense10 or the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China)?

The Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) leads on camera score (87/100 vs 57/100).

Which is more powerful: the Sharp Aquos Sense10 or the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China)?

The Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) leads on performance (98/100 vs 60/100).

Should you choose the Sharp Aquos Sense10 over the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China)?

The Sharp Aquos Sense10 is a better fit for active users. The Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.