Sharp Aquos R9 vs Xiaomi 17 Pro Max

The Sharp Aquos R9 (2024) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3, while the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; launch prices were $599 and $999. By overall MobileRank rating, the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max leads — 88/100 vs 68/100 (a 20-point difference). Key differences: the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max has the bigger battery (7500 mAh vs 5000); the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max is faster in AnTuTu (3,998,145 vs 1,660,924); the Sharp Aquos R9 is noticeably lighter (195g vs 219g).

The Xiaomi 17 Pro Max significantly outperforms the Sharp Aquos R9 by 20 points (88/100 vs 68/100).

Profile comparison

Category scores

Sharp Aquos R9

Performance 74
Display 90
Camera 60
Battery 52
Portability 52
Value for money 50

Xiaomi 17 Pro Max

Performance 98
Display 81
Camera 87
Battery 89
Portability 48
Value for money 86

What makes Sharp Aquos R9 better?

  • Higher refresh rate: 240Hz vs 120Hz
  • Lighter: 195g vs 219g
  • Cheaper at launch: $599 vs $999

  • Better display (90/100 vs 81/100)
  • Better portability (52/100 vs 48/100)

What makes Xiaomi 17 Pro Max better?

  • Higher AnTuTu: 3998145 vs 1660924
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3639 vs 1860
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 11047 vs 5045
  • Bigger battery: 7500 vs 5000 mAh

  • Higher performance (98/100 vs 74/100)
  • Better camera (87/100 vs 60/100)
  • Longer battery life (89/100 vs 52/100)

Comparison verdict

Comparing the Sharp Aquos R9 vs the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max, the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max scores 20 points higher (88/100 vs 68/100). In the "performance" category, the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max leads (98/100 vs 74/100). In the "camera" category, the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max leads (87/100 vs 60/100). In the "battery" category, the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max leads (89/100 vs 52/100). Value score: Sharp Aquos R9 — 50/100, Xiaomi 17 Pro Max — 86/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max notably outperforms the Sharp Aquos R9 (98/100 vs 74/100). In the "display" category, the Sharp Aquos R9 is a bit better (90/100 vs 81/100). In the "camera" category, the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max notably outperforms the Sharp Aquos R9 (87/100 vs 60/100). In the "battery" category, the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max significantly outperforms the Sharp Aquos R9 (89/100 vs 52/100). In the "portability" category, the Sharp Aquos R9 and the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max are nearly equal (52/100 vs 48/100).

Sharp Aquos R9: The Sharp Aquos R9 is a better fit for active users.
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max: The Xiaomi 17 Pro Max is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.

Specs comparison

Specification Sharp Aquos R9 Xiaomi 17 Pro Max
Processor Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
AnTuTu 1660924 3998145
Geekbench Single 1860 3639
Geekbench Multi 5045 11047
Display 6.5" PRO IGZO LTPO OLED 6.9" LTPO AMOLED
Resolution 1080x2340 1200x2608
Refresh rate 240 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 5000 mAh 7500 mAh
Charging — 100W
Wireless charging 0W 50W
DXOMark (camera) — 159
Main camera 50 MP 50 MP
Ultrawide 50 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 0 MP 50 MP
Front camera 50 MP 50 MP
RAM 12GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 256GB 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 14 Android 16
Brightness (peak) 2000 nits 3500 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP68 IP68
Dimensions 156.0×75.0×8.9 mm 162.9×77.6×8.0 mm
Weight 195 g 219 g
Launch price $599 $999

Camera comparison

Sharp Aquos R9

  • Main: 50MP f/1.9
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Front: 50MP
60
camera

Xiaomi 17 Pro Max

  • Main: 50MP f/1.69
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 50MP
87
camera

Display comparison

Sharp Aquos R9

  • 6.5" PRO IGZO LTPO OLED
  • Resolution: 1080x2340
  • Refresh rate: 240 Hz
90
display

Xiaomi 17 Pro Max

  • 6.9" LTPO AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1200x2608
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
81
display

Battery and charging

Sharp Aquos R9

  • 5000 mAh
  • No wireless charging
52
battery

Xiaomi 17 Pro Max

  • 7500 mAh
  • NanoReview test: web browsing 16:28 hrs, total 36:26 hrs
  • Wired: 100W
  • Wireless: 50W
89
battery

Overall performance score

We compared Sharp Aquos R9 and Xiaomi 17 Pro Max, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Sharp Aquos R9 Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3
68/100
1660924 AnTuTu
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
88/100 +58.5%
3998145 AnTuTu

Xiaomi 17 Pro Max leads Sharp Aquos R9 by 58.5% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks

Launch prices and where to check today's

Sharp Aquos R9

$599

Xiaomi 17 Pro Max

$999

Launch price difference: $400. Sharp Aquos R9 was $400 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max notably outperforms the Sharp Aquos R9 (98/100 vs 74/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Sharp Aquos R9 is a bit better (90/100 vs 81/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max notably outperforms the Sharp Aquos R9 (87/100 vs 60/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max significantly outperforms the Sharp Aquos R9 (89/100 vs 52/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Sharp Aquos R9 and the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max are nearly equal (52/100 vs 48/100).

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the Sharp Aquos R9 or the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max?

The Xiaomi 17 Pro Max significantly outperforms the Sharp Aquos R9 by 20 points (88/100 vs 68/100).

What is the rating of the Sharp Aquos R9 and the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max?

The Sharp Aquos R9 has a MobileRank rating of 68/100, the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max — 88/100.

Which has the better camera: the Sharp Aquos R9 or the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max?

The Xiaomi 17 Pro Max leads on camera score (87/100 vs 60/100).

Which is more powerful: the Sharp Aquos R9 or the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max?

The Xiaomi 17 Pro Max leads on performance (98/100 vs 74/100).

Should you choose the Sharp Aquos R9 over the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max?

The Sharp Aquos R9 is a better fit for active users. The Xiaomi 17 Pro Max is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.