Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 vs Vivo Y500 (China)
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, while the Vivo Y500 (China) (2025) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 7300; launch prices were $1999 and $185. By overall MobileRank rating, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 leads — 75/100 vs 55/100 (a 20-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo Y500 (China) has the bigger battery (8200 mAh vs 4400); the main camera is 200 MP vs 50 MP; the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 is faster in AnTuTu (3,065,623 vs 879,714); the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 is thinner (4.2mm vs 8.2mm).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7
Vivo Y500 (China)
What makes Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3065623 vs 879714
- Better Geekbench Single: 2910 vs 1011
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9174 vs 2813
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Higher performance (91/100 vs 55/100)
- Better camera (76/100 vs 30/100)
- Better portability (66/100 vs 49/100)
What makes Vivo Y500 (China) better?
- Bigger battery: 8200 vs 4400 mAh
- Faster charging: 90W vs 25W
- Lighter: 213g vs 215g
- Cheaper at launch: $185 vs $1999
- Longer battery life (74/100 vs 39/100)
- Better display (79/100 vs 78/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 vs the Vivo Y500 (China), the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 scores 20 points higher (75/100 vs 55/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 leads (91/100 vs 55/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 leads (76/100 vs 30/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo Y500 (China) leads (74/100 vs 39/100). Value score: Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 — 58/100, Vivo Y500 (China) — 74/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 significantly outperforms the Vivo Y500 (China) (91/100 vs 55/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo Y500 (China) and the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 are nearly equal (79/100 vs 78/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 significantly outperforms the Vivo Y500 (China) (76/100 vs 30/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo Y500 (China) significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 (74/100 vs 39/100). In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 notably outperforms the Vivo Y500 (China) (66/100 vs 49/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 | Vivo Y500 (China) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | MediaTek Dimensity 7300 | |
| AnTuTu | 3065623 | 879714 | |
| Geekbench Single | 2910 | 1011 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 9174 | 2813 | |
| Display | 8.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 2184x1968 | 1080x2392 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 4400 mAh | 8200 mAh | |
| Charging | 25W | 90W | |
| Wireless charging | 15W | 0W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | 145 | — | |
| Main camera | 200 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 12 MP | 0 MP | |
| Telephoto | 10 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 10 MP | 8 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 8GB / 12GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | 128GB / 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | Android 16 / One UI 8 | Android 15 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 2600 nits | 5000 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP48 | — | |
| Dimensions | 158.4×143.2×4.2 mm | 163.1×75.9×8.2 mm | |
| Weight | 215 g | 213 g | |
| Launch price | $1999 | $185 |
Camera comparison
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7
- Main: 200MP f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Telephoto: 10MP
- Front: 10MP
Vivo Y500 (China)
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Front: 8MP
Display comparison
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7
- 8.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
- Resolution: 2184x1968
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo Y500 (China)
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2392
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7
- 4400 mAh
- Wired: 25W
- Wireless: 15W
Vivo Y500 (China)
- 8200 mAh
- Wired: 90W
- No wireless charging
Overall performance score
We compared Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 and Vivo Y500 (China), covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 leads Vivo Y500 (China) by 248.5% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $1814. Vivo Y500 (China) was $1814 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 significantly outperforms the Vivo Y500 (China) (91/100 vs 55/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo Y500 (China) and the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 are nearly equal (79/100 vs 78/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 significantly outperforms the Vivo Y500 (China) (76/100 vs 30/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo Y500 (China) significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 (74/100 vs 39/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 notably outperforms the Vivo Y500 (China) (66/100 vs 49/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 or the Vivo Y500 (China)?
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 significantly outperforms the Vivo Y500 (China) by 20 points (75/100 vs 55/100).
What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 and the Vivo Y500 (China)?
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 has a MobileRank rating of 75/100, the Vivo Y500 (China) — 55/100.
Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 or the Vivo Y500 (China)?
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 leads on camera score (76/100 vs 30/100).
Which is more powerful: the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 or the Vivo Y500 (China)?
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 leads on performance (91/100 vs 55/100).
Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 over the Vivo Y500 (China)?
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 is a better fit for gamers and power users.