Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 vs Xiaomi 17 Pro

The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 (2022) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, while the Xiaomi 17 Pro (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; launch prices were $1799 and $825. By overall MobileRank rating, the Xiaomi 17 Pro leads — 86/100 vs 62/100 (a 24-point difference). Key differences: the Xiaomi 17 Pro has the bigger battery (6300 mAh vs 4400); the Xiaomi 17 Pro is faster in AnTuTu (3,569,354 vs 1,378,803); the Xiaomi 17 Pro is noticeably lighter (192g vs 263g).

The Xiaomi 17 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 by 24 points (86/100 vs 62/100).

Profile comparison

Category scores

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4

Performance 70
Display 78
Camera 60
Battery 39
Portability 52
Value for money 32

Xiaomi 17 Pro

Performance 95
Display 85
Camera 81
Battery 84
Portability 64
Value for money 86

What makes Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 better?


  • Overall rating 62/100

What makes Xiaomi 17 Pro better?

  • Higher AnTuTu: 3569354 vs 1378803
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3310 vs 1761
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 10070 vs 4688
  • Bigger battery: 6300 vs 4400 mAh
  • Faster charging: 100W vs 25W
  • Faster wireless charging: 50W vs 15W
  • Lighter: 192g vs 263g
  • Cheaper at launch: $825 vs $1799

  • Higher performance (95/100 vs 70/100)
  • Better camera (81/100 vs 60/100)
  • Longer battery life (84/100 vs 39/100)
  • Better display (85/100 vs 78/100)
  • Better portability (64/100 vs 52/100)

Comparison verdict

Comparing the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 vs the Xiaomi 17 Pro, the Xiaomi 17 Pro scores 24 points higher (86/100 vs 62/100). In the "performance" category, the Xiaomi 17 Pro leads (95/100 vs 70/100). In the "camera" category, the Xiaomi 17 Pro leads (81/100 vs 60/100). In the "battery" category, the Xiaomi 17 Pro leads (84/100 vs 39/100). Value score: Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 — 32/100, Xiaomi 17 Pro — 86/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Xiaomi 17 Pro notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 (95/100 vs 70/100). In the "display" category, the Xiaomi 17 Pro is a bit better (85/100 vs 78/100). In the "camera" category, the Xiaomi 17 Pro notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 (81/100 vs 60/100). In the "battery" category, the Xiaomi 17 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 (84/100 vs 39/100). In the "portability" category, the Xiaomi 17 Pro is a bit better (64/100 vs 52/100).

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4: The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 is a better fit for active users.
Xiaomi 17 Pro: The Xiaomi 17 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.

Specs comparison

Specification Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 Xiaomi 17 Pro
Processor Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
AnTuTu 1378803 3569354
Geekbench Single 1761 3310
Geekbench Multi 4688 10070
Display 7.6" Dynamic AMOLED 2X 6.3" LTPO AMOLED
Resolution 2176x1812 2656x1220
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 4400 mAh 6300 mAh
Charging 25W 100W
Wireless charging 15W 50W
DXOMark (camera) 124 —
Main camera 50 MP 50 MP
Ultrawide 12 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 10 MP 50 MP
Front camera 10 MP 50 MP
RAM 12GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 256GB / 512GB / 1TB 256GB / 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 12 Android 16 / HyperOS 3
Brightness (peak) 1200 nits 3500 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IPX8 IP68
Dimensions 155.1×130.1×6.3 mm 151.1×71.8×8.0 mm
Weight 263 g 192 g
Launch price $1799 $825

Camera comparison

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4

  • Main: 50MP f/1.8
  • Ultrawide: 12MP
  • Telephoto: 10MP
  • Front: 10MP
60
camera

Xiaomi 17 Pro

  • Main: 50MP f/1.7
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 50MP
81
camera

Display comparison

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4

  • 7.6" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
  • Resolution: 2176x1812
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
78
display

Xiaomi 17 Pro

  • 6.3" LTPO AMOLED
  • Resolution: 2656x1220
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
85
display

Battery and charging

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4

  • 4400 mAh
  • Wired: 25W
  • Wireless: 15W
39
battery

Xiaomi 17 Pro

  • 6300 mAh
  • Wired: 100W
  • Wireless: 50W
84
battery

Overall performance score

We compared Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 and Xiaomi 17 Pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1
62/100
1378803 AnTuTu
Xiaomi 17 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
86/100 +61.4%
3569354 AnTuTu

Xiaomi 17 Pro leads Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 by 61.4% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks

Launch prices and where to check today's

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4

$1799

Xiaomi 17 Pro

$825

Launch price difference: $974. Xiaomi 17 Pro was $974 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, the Xiaomi 17 Pro notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 (95/100 vs 70/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Xiaomi 17 Pro is a bit better (85/100 vs 78/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Xiaomi 17 Pro notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 (81/100 vs 60/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Xiaomi 17 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 (84/100 vs 39/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Xiaomi 17 Pro is a bit better (64/100 vs 52/100).

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 or the Xiaomi 17 Pro?

The Xiaomi 17 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 by 24 points (86/100 vs 62/100).

What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 and the Xiaomi 17 Pro?

The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 has a MobileRank rating of 62/100, the Xiaomi 17 Pro — 86/100.

Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 or the Xiaomi 17 Pro?

The Xiaomi 17 Pro leads on camera score (81/100 vs 60/100).

Which is more powerful: the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 or the Xiaomi 17 Pro?

The Xiaomi 17 Pro leads on performance (95/100 vs 70/100).

Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 over the Xiaomi 17 Pro?

The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold4 is a better fit for active users. The Xiaomi 17 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.