Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 vs Vivo Y19

The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, while the Vivo Y19 (2025) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 6300; estimated prices are $1999 and $65. By overall MobileRank rating, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 leads — 61/100 vs 20/100 (a 41-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo Y19 has the bigger battery (5500 mAh vs 4400); the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 is faster in AnTuTu (3,065,623 vs 524,785); the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 has NFC for contactless payments, the Vivo Y19 doesn't; the Vivo Y19 is noticeably lighter (199g vs 215g).

The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 significantly outperforms the Vivo Y19 by 41 points (61/100 vs 20/100).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7
Performance 67
Display 100
Camera 76
Battery 25
Design 31
Value for money 0
Vivo Y19
Performance 0
Display 50
Camera 0
Battery 43
Design 51
Value for money 100
What makes Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 better?
  • Higher AnTuTu: 3065623 vs 524785
  • Better Geekbench Single: 2910 vs 771
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 9174 vs 1980
  • Faster charging: 25W vs 15W
  • Higher refresh rate: 120Hz vs 90Hz

  • Higher performance (67/100 vs 0/100)
  • Better camera (76/100 vs 0/100)
  • Better display (100/100 vs 50/100)
What makes Vivo Y19 better?
  • Bigger battery: 5500 vs 4400 mAh
  • Lighter: 199g vs 215g
  • Cheaper: $65 vs $1999

  • Longer battery life (43/100 vs 25/100)
  • Better design/ergonomics (51/100 vs 31/100)
  • Better value for money (100/100 vs 0/100)
Comparison verdict

Comparing the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 vs the Vivo Y19, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 scores 41 points higher (61/100 vs 20/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 leads (67/100 vs 0/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 leads (76/100 vs 0/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo Y19 leads (43/100 vs 25/100). In the "value for money" category, the Vivo Y19 leads (100/100 vs 0/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 significantly outperforms the Vivo Y19 (67/100 vs 0/100). In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 significantly outperforms the Vivo Y19 (100/100 vs 50/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 significantly outperforms the Vivo Y19 (76/100 vs 0/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo Y19 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 (43/100 vs 25/100). In the "design" category, the Vivo Y19 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 (51/100 vs 31/100). In the "value for money" category, the Vivo Y19 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 (100/100 vs 0/100).

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7: The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 is a better fit for active users.
Vivo Y19: The Vivo Y19 is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers.
Specs comparison
Specification Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 Vivo Y19
Processor Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite MediaTek Dimensity 6300
AnTuTu 3065623 524785
Geekbench Single 2910 771
Geekbench Multi 9174 1980
Display 8.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X 6.7" IPS LCD
Resolution 2184x1968 720x1600
Refresh rate 120 Hz 90 Hz
Battery 4400 mAh 5500 mAh
Charging 25W 15W
Wireless charging 15W 0W
DXOMark (camera) 145
Main camera 200 MP
Ultrawide 12 MP 0 MP
Telephoto 10 MP 0 MP
Front camera 10 MP 5 MP
RAM 12GB / 16GB 4GB / 6GB
Storage 256GB / 512GB / 1TB 64GB / 128GB
OS Android 16 / One UI 8 Android 15, Funtouch 15
Brightness (peak) 2600 nits
NFC yes no
Protection IP48
Dimensions 158.4×143.2×4.2 mm 162.2×76.5×8.9 mm
Weight 215 g 199 g
Price $1999 $65
Camera comparison
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7
  • Main: 200MP f/f/1.7
  • Ultrawide: 12MP
  • Telephoto: 10MP
  • Front: 10MP
76
camera
Vivo Y19
  • Main: —
  • Front: 5MP
0
camera
Display comparison
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7
  • 8.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
  • Resolution: 2184x1968
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
100
display
Vivo Y19
  • 6.7" IPS LCD
  • Resolution: 720x1600
  • Refresh rate: 90 Hz
50
display
Battery and charging
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7
  • 4400 mAh
  • Wired: 25W
  • Wireless: 15W
25
battery
Vivo Y19
  • 5500 mAh
  • Wired: 15W
  • No wireless charging
43
battery
Overall performance score

We compared Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 and Vivo Y19, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
61/100
3065623 AnTuTu
Vivo Y19 MediaTek Dimensity 6300
20/100 -484.2%
524785 AnTuTu

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 leads Vivo Y19 by 484.2% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks
Price and availability
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7
$1999
Vivo Y19
$65

Price difference: $1934. Vivo Y19 is cheaper by $1934.

Detailed category analysis
performance

In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 significantly outperforms the Vivo Y19 (67/100 vs 0/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 significantly outperforms the Vivo Y19 (100/100 vs 50/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 significantly outperforms the Vivo Y19 (76/100 vs 0/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Vivo Y19 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 (43/100 vs 25/100).

design

In the "design" category, the Vivo Y19 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 (51/100 vs 31/100).

value for money

In the "value for money" category, the Vivo Y19 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 (100/100 vs 0/100).

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 or the Vivo Y19?

The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 significantly outperforms the Vivo Y19 by 41 points (61/100 vs 20/100).

What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 and the Vivo Y19?

The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 has a MobileRank rating of 61/100, the Vivo Y19 — 20/100.

Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 or the Vivo Y19?

The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 leads on camera score (76/100 vs 0/100).

Which is more powerful: the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 or the Vivo Y19?

The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 leads on performance (67/100 vs 0/100).

Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 over the Vivo Y19?

The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 is a better fit for active users. The Vivo Y19 is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers.