Samsung Galaxy A05 vs Vivo Y19
The Samsung Galaxy A05 (2023) runs on the MediaTek Helio G85, while the Vivo Y19 (2025) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 6300; estimated prices are $89 and $65. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo Y19 leads — 20/100 vs 19/100 (a 1-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo Y19 has the bigger battery (5500 mAh vs 5000); the Vivo Y19 is faster in AnTuTu (524,785 vs 346,495).
Samsung Galaxy A05
Vivo Y19
- Faster charging: 25W vs 15W
- Lighter: 195g vs 199g
- Better camera (24/100 vs 0/100)
- Better design/ergonomics (56/100 vs 51/100)
- Higher AnTuTu: 524785 vs 346495
- Better Geekbench Single: 771 vs 420
- Better Geekbench Multi: 1980 vs 1364
- Bigger battery: 5500 vs 5000 mAh
- Cheaper: $65 vs $89
- Longer battery life (43/100 vs 37/100)
- Better display (50/100 vs 0/100)
Comparing the Samsung Galaxy A05 vs the Vivo Y19, the Vivo Y19 scores 1 points higher (20/100 vs 19/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy A05 leads (24/100 vs 0/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100. In the "display" category, the Vivo Y19 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A05 (50/100 vs 0/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy A05 notably outperforms the Vivo Y19 (24/100 vs 0/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo Y19 is a bit better (43/100 vs 37/100). In the "design" category, the Samsung Galaxy A05 is a bit better (56/100 vs 51/100). In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100.
| Specification | Samsung Galaxy A05 | Vivo Y19 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Helio G85 | MediaTek Dimensity 6300 | |
| AnTuTu | 346495 | 524785 | |
| Geekbench Single | 420 | 771 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 1364 | 1980 | |
| Display | 6.7" | 6.7" IPS LCD | |
| Resolution | 720x1600 | 720x1600 | |
| Refresh rate | — | 90 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 5500 mAh | |
| Charging | 25W | 15W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | — | |
| Front camera | 8 MP | 5 MP | |
| RAM | 4GB / 6GB | 4GB / 6GB | |
| Storage | 64GB / 128GB | 64GB / 128GB | |
| OS | Android 13 | Android 15, Funtouch 15 | |
| NFC | no | no | |
| Dimensions | 168.8×78.2×8.8 mm | 162.2×76.5×8.9 mm | |
| Weight | 195 g | 199 g | |
| Price | $89 | $65 |
Samsung Galaxy A05
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Front: 8MP
Vivo Y19
- Main: —
- Front: 5MP
Samsung Galaxy A05
- 6.7"
- Resolution: 720x1600
- Refresh rate: —
Vivo Y19
- 6.7" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 720x1600
- Refresh rate: 90 Hz
Samsung Galaxy A05
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 25W
- No wireless charging
Vivo Y19
- 5500 mAh
- Wired: 15W
- No wireless charging
We compared Samsung Galaxy A05 and Vivo Y19, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo Y19 leads Samsung Galaxy A05 by 34.0% in our overall performance rating.
Price difference: $24. Vivo Y19 is cheaper by $24.
performance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100.
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo Y19 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A05 (50/100 vs 0/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy A05 notably outperforms the Vivo Y19 (24/100 vs 0/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo Y19 is a bit better (43/100 vs 37/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Samsung Galaxy A05 is a bit better (56/100 vs 51/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100.
Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy A05 or the Vivo Y19?
The Vivo Y19 edges out the Samsung Galaxy A05 by just 1 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy A05 and the Vivo Y19?
The Samsung Galaxy A05 has a MobileRank rating of 19/100, the Vivo Y19 — 20/100.
Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy A05 or the Vivo Y19?
The Samsung Galaxy A05 leads on camera score (24/100 vs 0/100).
Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy A05 over the Vivo Y19?
The Samsung Galaxy A05 is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers. The Vivo Y19 is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers.