Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8 vs Xiaomi 11T Pro

The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8 (2026) runs on the Exynos 2600, while the Xiaomi 11T Pro (2021) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 888; launch prices were $1099 and $500. By overall MobileRank rating, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8 leads — 66/100 vs 61/100 (a 5-point difference). Key differences: the Xiaomi 11T Pro has the bigger battery (5000 mAh vs 4300); the main camera is 50 MP vs 108 MP; the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8 is faster in AnTuTu (3,113,347 vs 1,140,220); the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8 is noticeably lighter (180g vs 204g).

The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8 edges out the Xiaomi 11T Pro by just 5 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.

Profile comparison

Category scores

Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8

Performance 93
Display 80
Camera 35
Battery 37
Portability 80
Value for money 42

Xiaomi 11T Pro

Performance 64
Display 79
Camera 48
Battery 64
Portability 48
Value for money 44

What makes Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8 better?

  • Higher AnTuTu: 3113347 vs 1140220
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3235 vs 1500
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 10904 vs 3537
  • Lighter: 180g vs 204g

  • Higher performance (93/100 vs 64/100)
  • Better display (80/100 vs 79/100)
  • Better portability (80/100 vs 48/100)

What makes Xiaomi 11T Pro better?

  • Bigger battery: 5000 vs 4300 mAh
  • Faster charging: 120W vs 25W
  • Better main camera: 108MP vs 50MP
  • Cheaper at launch: $500 vs $1099

  • Better camera (48/100 vs 35/100)
  • Longer battery life (64/100 vs 37/100)

Comparison verdict

Comparing the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8 vs the Xiaomi 11T Pro, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8 scores 5 points higher (66/100 vs 61/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8 leads (93/100 vs 64/100). In the "camera" category, the Xiaomi 11T Pro leads (48/100 vs 35/100). In the "battery" category, the Xiaomi 11T Pro leads (64/100 vs 37/100). Value score: Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8 — 42/100, Xiaomi 11T Pro — 44/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8 notably outperforms the Xiaomi 11T Pro (93/100 vs 64/100). In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8 and the Xiaomi 11T Pro are nearly equal (80/100 vs 79/100). In the "camera" category, the Xiaomi 11T Pro is a bit better (48/100 vs 35/100). In the "battery" category, the Xiaomi 11T Pro notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8 (64/100 vs 37/100). In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8 significantly outperforms the Xiaomi 11T Pro (80/100 vs 48/100).

Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8: The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8 is a better fit for gamers and power users.
Xiaomi 11T Pro: The Xiaomi 11T Pro is a better fit for active users.

Specs comparison

Specification Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8 Xiaomi 11T Pro
Processor Exynos 2600 Qualcomm Snapdragon 888
AnTuTu 3113347 1140220
Geekbench Single 3235 1500
Geekbench Multi 10904 3537
Display 6.9" Foldable Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X 6.7" AMOLED
Resolution 1080x2520 2400x1080
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 4300 mAh 5000 mAh
Charging 25W 120W
Wireless charging 15W 0W
DXOMark (camera) — 108
Main camera 50 MP 108 MP
Ultrawide 12 MP 8 MP
Front camera 10 MP 16 MP
RAM 12GB 8GB / 12GB
Storage 256GB / 512GB 128GB / 256GB
OS Android 16 / One UI 8.5 Android 11
Brightness (peak) 2600 nits 1000 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP48 IP53
Dimensions — 164.1×76.9×8.8 mm
Weight 180 g 204 g
Launch price $1099 $500

Camera comparison

Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8

  • Main: 50MP f/1.8
  • Ultrawide: 12MP
  • Front: 10MP
35
camera

Xiaomi 11T Pro

  • Main: 108MP f/1.75
  • Ultrawide: 8MP
  • Front: 16MP
48
camera

Display comparison

Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8

  • 6.9" Foldable Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X
  • Resolution: 1080x2520
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
80
display

Xiaomi 11T Pro

  • 6.7" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 2400x1080
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
79
display

Battery and charging

Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8

  • 4300 mAh
  • Wired: 25W
  • Wireless: 15W
37
battery

Xiaomi 11T Pro

  • 5000 mAh
  • Wired: 120W
  • No wireless charging
64
battery

Overall performance score

We compared Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8 and Xiaomi 11T Pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8 Exynos 2600
66/100
3113347 AnTuTu
Xiaomi 11T Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 888
61/100 -173.0%
1140220 AnTuTu

Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8 leads Xiaomi 11T Pro by 173.0% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks

Launch prices and where to check today's

Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8

$1099

Xiaomi 11T Pro

$500

Launch price difference: $599. Xiaomi 11T Pro was $599 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8 notably outperforms the Xiaomi 11T Pro (93/100 vs 64/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8 and the Xiaomi 11T Pro are nearly equal (80/100 vs 79/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Xiaomi 11T Pro is a bit better (48/100 vs 35/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Xiaomi 11T Pro notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8 (64/100 vs 37/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8 significantly outperforms the Xiaomi 11T Pro (80/100 vs 48/100).

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8 or the Xiaomi 11T Pro?

The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8 edges out the Xiaomi 11T Pro by just 5 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.

What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8 and the Xiaomi 11T Pro?

The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8 has a MobileRank rating of 66/100, the Xiaomi 11T Pro — 61/100.

Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8 or the Xiaomi 11T Pro?

The Xiaomi 11T Pro leads on camera score (48/100 vs 35/100).

Which is more powerful: the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8 or the Xiaomi 11T Pro?

The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8 leads on performance (93/100 vs 64/100).

Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8 over the Xiaomi 11T Pro?

The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8 is a better fit for gamers and power users. The Xiaomi 11T Pro is a better fit for active users.