Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 FE vs Vivo X500

The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 FE (2025) runs on the Samsung Exynos 2400, while the Vivo X500 (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 9600M; launch prices were $849 and $820. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X500 leads — 89/100 vs 60/100 (a 29-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X500 has the bigger battery (7500 mAh vs 4000); the Vivo X500 is faster in AnTuTu (3,930,719 vs 1,841,283); the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 FE is noticeably lighter (187g vs 211g).

The Vivo X500 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 FE by 29 points (89/100 vs 60/100).

Profile comparison

Category scores

Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 FE

Performance 79
Display 82
Camera 35
Battery 31
Portability 78
Value for money 34

Vivo X500

Performance 96
Display 94
Camera 87
Battery 84
Portability 50
Value for money 92

What makes Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 FE better?

  • Lighter: 187g vs 211g

  • Better portability (78/100 vs 50/100)

What makes Vivo X500 better?

  • Higher AnTuTu: 3930719 vs 1841283
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3302 vs 2115
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 10240 vs 6826
  • Bigger battery: 7500 vs 4000 mAh
  • Faster charging: 90W vs 25W
  • Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
  • Faster wireless charging: 40W vs 15W
  • Cheaper at launch: $820 vs $849

  • Higher performance (96/100 vs 79/100)
  • Better camera (87/100 vs 35/100)
  • Longer battery life (84/100 vs 31/100)
  • Better display (94/100 vs 82/100)

Comparison verdict

Comparing the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 FE vs the Vivo X500, the Vivo X500 scores 29 points higher (89/100 vs 60/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X500 leads (96/100 vs 79/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X500 leads (87/100 vs 35/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X500 leads (84/100 vs 31/100). Value score: Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 FE — 34/100, Vivo X500 — 92/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Vivo X500 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 FE (96/100 vs 79/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X500 is a bit better (94/100 vs 82/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X500 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 FE (87/100 vs 35/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X500 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 FE (84/100 vs 31/100). In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 FE notably outperforms the Vivo X500 (78/100 vs 50/100).

Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 FE: The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 FE is a better fit for active users.
Vivo X500: The Vivo X500 is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.

Specs comparison

Specification Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 FE Vivo X500
Processor Samsung Exynos 2400 MediaTek Dimensity 9600M
AnTuTu 1841283 3930719
Geekbench Single 2115 3302
Geekbench Multi 6826 10240
Display 6.7" Dynamic AMOLED 2X 6.6" AMOLED
Resolution 2640x1080 1260x2750
Refresh rate 120 Hz 144 Hz
Battery 4000 mAh 7500 mAh
Charging 25W 90W
Wireless charging 15W 40W
Main camera 50 MP 50 MP
Ultrawide 12 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 0 MP 64 MP
Front camera 10 MP 50 MP
RAM 8GB 12GB
Storage 128GB / 256GB 256GB / 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 16 / One UI 8 Android 17
Brightness (peak) 2600 nits 4000 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP48 IP68/IP69
Dimensions 165.1×71.9×6.9 mm 157.0×75.0×8.2 mm
Weight 187 g 211 g
Launch price $849 $820

Camera comparison

Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 FE

  • Main: 50MP f/1.8
  • Ultrawide: 12MP
  • Front: 10MP
35
camera

Vivo X500

  • Main: 50MP f/1.7
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 64MP
  • Front: 50MP
87
camera

Display comparison

Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 FE

  • 6.7" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
  • Resolution: 2640x1080
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
82
display

Vivo X500

  • 6.6" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1260x2750
  • Refresh rate: 144 Hz
94
display

Battery and charging

Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 FE

  • 4000 mAh
  • Wired: 25W
  • Wireless: 15W
31
battery

Vivo X500

  • 7500 mAh
  • Wired: 90W
  • Wireless: 40W
84
battery

Overall performance score

We compared Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 FE and Vivo X500, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 FE Samsung Exynos 2400
60/100
1841283 AnTuTu
Vivo X500 MediaTek Dimensity 9600M
89/100 +53.2%
3930719 AnTuTu

Vivo X500 leads Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 FE by 53.2% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks

Launch prices and where to check today's

Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 FE

$849

Vivo X500

$820

Launch price difference: $29. Vivo X500 was $29 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, the Vivo X500 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 FE (96/100 vs 79/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Vivo X500 is a bit better (94/100 vs 82/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Vivo X500 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 FE (87/100 vs 35/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Vivo X500 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 FE (84/100 vs 31/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 FE notably outperforms the Vivo X500 (78/100 vs 50/100).

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 FE or the Vivo X500?

The Vivo X500 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 FE by 29 points (89/100 vs 60/100).

What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 FE and the Vivo X500?

The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 FE has a MobileRank rating of 60/100, the Vivo X500 — 89/100.

Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 FE or the Vivo X500?

The Vivo X500 leads on camera score (87/100 vs 35/100).

Which is more powerful: the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 FE or the Vivo X500?

The Vivo X500 leads on performance (96/100 vs 79/100).

Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 FE over the Vivo X500?

The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 FE is a better fit for active users. The Vivo X500 is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.