Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra vs Vivo X500

The Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, while the Vivo X500 (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 9600M; launch prices were $1299 and $820. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X500 leads — 89/100 vs 84/100 (a 5-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X500 has the bigger battery (7500 mAh vs 5000); the main camera is 200 MP vs 50 MP; the Vivo X500 is faster in AnTuTu (3,930,719 vs 3,463,142).

The Vivo X500 edges out the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra by just 5 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.

Profile comparison

Category scores

Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra

Performance 96
Display 88
Camera 86
Battery 61
Portability 51
Value for money 78

Vivo X500

Performance 96
Display 94
Camera 87
Battery 84
Portability 50
Value for money 92

What makes Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra better?

  • Better Geekbench Single: 3601 vs 3302
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 10686 vs 10240
  • Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP

  • Better portability (51/100 vs 50/100)

What makes Vivo X500 better?

  • Higher AnTuTu: 3930719 vs 3463142
  • Bigger battery: 7500 vs 5000 mAh
  • Faster charging: 90W vs 60W
  • Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
  • Faster wireless charging: 40W vs 25W
  • Lighter: 211g vs 214g
  • Cheaper at launch: $820 vs $1299

  • Better camera (87/100 vs 86/100)
  • Longer battery life (84/100 vs 61/100)
  • Better display (94/100 vs 88/100)

Comparison verdict

Comparing the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra vs the Vivo X500, the Vivo X500 scores 5 points higher (89/100 vs 84/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X500 leads (84/100 vs 61/100). Value score: Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra — 78/100, Vivo X500 — 92/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 96/100. In the "display" category, the Vivo X500 is a bit better (94/100 vs 88/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X500 and the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra are nearly equal (87/100 vs 86/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X500 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra (84/100 vs 61/100). In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra and the Vivo X500 are nearly equal (51/100 vs 50/100).

Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra: The Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, budget-conscious buyers.
Vivo X500: The Vivo X500 is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.

Specs comparison

Specification Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra Vivo X500
Processor Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 MediaTek Dimensity 9600M
AnTuTu 3463142 3930719
Geekbench Single 3601 3302
Geekbench Multi 10686 10240
Display 6.9" Dynamic AMOLED 2X 6.6" AMOLED
Resolution 3120x1440 1260x2750
Refresh rate 120 Hz 144 Hz
Battery 5000 mAh 7500 mAh
Charging 60W 90W
Wireless charging 25W 40W
DXOMark (camera) 157 —
Main camera 200 MP 50 MP
Ultrawide 50 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 50 MP 64 MP
Front camera 12 MP 50 MP
RAM 12GB / 16GB 12GB
Storage 256GB / 512GB / 1TB 256GB / 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 16 / One UI 8.5 Android 17
Brightness (peak) 2600 nits 4000 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP68 IP68/IP69
Dimensions 163.6×78.1×7.9 mm 157.0×75.0×8.2 mm
Weight 214 g 211 g
Launch price $1299 $820

Camera comparison

Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra

  • Main: 200MP f/1.7
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 12MP
86
camera

Vivo X500

  • Main: 50MP f/1.7
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 64MP
  • Front: 50MP
87
camera

Display comparison

Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra

  • 6.9" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
  • Resolution: 3120x1440
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
88
display

Vivo X500

  • 6.6" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1260x2750
  • Refresh rate: 144 Hz
94
display

Battery and charging

Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra

  • 5000 mAh
  • NanoReview test: web browsing 10:12 hrs, total 28:50 hrs
  • Wired: 60W
  • Wireless: 25W
61
battery

Vivo X500

  • 7500 mAh
  • Wired: 90W
  • Wireless: 40W
84
battery

Overall performance score

We compared Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra and Vivo X500, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
84/100
3463142 AnTuTu
Vivo X500 MediaTek Dimensity 9600M
89/100 +11.9%
3930719 AnTuTu

Vivo X500 leads Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra by 11.9% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks

Launch prices and where to check today's

Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra

$1299

Vivo X500

$820

Launch price difference: $479. Vivo X500 was $479 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 96/100.

display

In the "display" category, the Vivo X500 is a bit better (94/100 vs 88/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Vivo X500 and the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra are nearly equal (87/100 vs 86/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Vivo X500 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra (84/100 vs 61/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra and the Vivo X500 are nearly equal (51/100 vs 50/100).

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra or the Vivo X500?

The Vivo X500 edges out the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra by just 5 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.

What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra and the Vivo X500?

The Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra has a MobileRank rating of 84/100, the Vivo X500 — 89/100.

Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra over the Vivo X500?

The Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, budget-conscious buyers. The Vivo X500 is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.