Samsung Galaxy Z Flip3 vs Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide

The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip3 (2021) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 888, while the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite. By overall MobileRank rating, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide leads — 71/100 vs 47/100 (a 24-point difference). Key differences: the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide has the bigger battery (4800 mAh vs 3300); the main camera is 12 MP vs 50 MP; the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide is faster in AnTuTu (3,119,308 vs 1,119,714); the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip3 is noticeably lighter (183g vs 199g).

The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip3 by 24 points (71/100 vs 47/100).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip3
Performance 63
Display 82
Camera 16
Battery 19
Portability 76
Value for money 6
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide
Performance 92
Display 81
Camera 50
Battery 45
Portability 76
Value for money
What makes Samsung Galaxy Z Flip3 better?
  • Lighter: 183g vs 199g

  • Better display (82/100 vs 81/100)
What makes Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide better?
  • Higher AnTuTu: 3119308 vs 1119714
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3041 vs 1488
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 9494 vs 3373
  • Bigger battery: 4800 vs 3300 mAh
  • Faster charging: 45W vs 15W
  • Better main camera: 50MP vs 12MP

  • Higher performance (92/100 vs 63/100)
  • Better camera (50/100 vs 16/100)
  • Longer battery life (45/100 vs 19/100)
Comparison verdict

Comparing the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip3 vs the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide scores 24 points higher (71/100 vs 47/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide leads (92/100 vs 63/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide leads (50/100 vs 16/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide leads (45/100 vs 19/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip3 (92/100 vs 63/100). In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip3 and the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide are nearly equal (82/100 vs 81/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip3 (50/100 vs 16/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip3 (45/100 vs 19/100). In the "portability" category, both devices are on the same level — 76/100.

Samsung Galaxy Z Flip3: The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip3 is a better fit for active users.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide: The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide is a better fit for gamers and power users.
Specs comparison
Specification Samsung Galaxy Z Flip3 Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide
Processor Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
AnTuTu 1119714 3119308
Geekbench Single 1488 3041
Geekbench Multi 3373 9494
Display 6.7" Dynamic AMOLED 2X 7.6" Foldable Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2
Resolution 2640x1080 1828x2584
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 3300 mAh 4800 mAh
Charging 15W 45W
Wireless charging 10W 0W
Main camera 12 MP 50 MP
Ultrawide 12 MP 50 MP
Front camera 10 MP 10 MP
RAM 8GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 128GB / 256GB 256GB / 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 11 Android 16, up to 7 major Android upgrades, One UI 8
NFC yes
Protection IP48
Dimensions 161.4×123.9×4.9 mm
Weight 183 g 199 g
Launch price $999
Camera comparison
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip3
  • Main: 12MP f/1.8
  • Ultrawide: 12MP
  • Front: 10MP
16
camera
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide
  • Main: 50MP
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Front: 10MP
50
camera
Display comparison
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip3
  • 6.7" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
  • Resolution: 2640x1080
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
82
display
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide
  • 7.6" Foldable Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2
  • Resolution: 1828x2584
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
81
display
Battery and charging
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip3
  • 3300 mAh
  • Wired: 15W
  • Wireless: 10W
19
battery
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide
  • 4800 mAh
  • Wired: 45W
  • No wireless charging
45
battery
Overall performance score

We compared Samsung Galaxy Z Flip3 and Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Samsung Galaxy Z Flip3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 888
47/100
1119714 AnTuTu
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
71/100 +64.1%
3119308 AnTuTu

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide leads Samsung Galaxy Z Flip3 by 64.1% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip3
$999
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide
Price unknown
Detailed category analysis
performance

In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip3 (92/100 vs 63/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip3 and the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide are nearly equal (82/100 vs 81/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip3 (50/100 vs 16/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip3 (45/100 vs 19/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, both devices are on the same level — 76/100.

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip3 or the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide?

The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip3 by 24 points (71/100 vs 47/100).

What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip3 and the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide?

The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip3 has a MobileRank rating of 47/100, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide — 71/100.

Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip3 or the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide?

The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide leads on camera score (50/100 vs 16/100).

Which is more powerful: the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip3 or the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide?

The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide leads on performance (92/100 vs 63/100).

Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip3 over the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide?

The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip3 is a better fit for active users. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide is a better fit for gamers and power users.