Samsung Galaxy S9+ vs Vivo Y32t
The Samsung Galaxy S9+ (2018) runs on the Samsung Exynos 9810, while the Vivo Y32t (2022) runs on the MediaTek Helio P70 (). By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo Y32t leads — 11/100 vs 6/100 (a 5-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo Y32t has the bigger battery (5000 mAh vs 3500); the main camera is 12 MP vs 13 MP; the Samsung Galaxy S9+ has NFC for contactless payments, the Vivo Y32t doesn't.
Samsung Galaxy S9+
Vivo Y32t
- Better camera (4/100 vs 0/100)
- Bigger battery: 5000 vs 3500 mAh
- Better main camera: 13MP vs 12MP
- Lighter: 179g vs 189g
- Longer battery life (36/100 vs 1/100)
- Better design/ergonomics (76/100 vs 63/100)
- Better value for money (55/100 vs 52/100)
Comparing the Samsung Galaxy S9+ vs the Vivo Y32t, the Vivo Y32t scores 5 points higher (11/100 vs 6/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo Y32t leads (36/100 vs 1/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100. In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100. In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S9+ and the Vivo Y32t are nearly equal (4/100 vs 0/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo Y32t significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S9+ (36/100 vs 1/100). In the "design" category, the Vivo Y32t is a bit better (76/100 vs 63/100). In the "value for money" category, the Vivo Y32t and the Samsung Galaxy S9+ are nearly equal (55/100 vs 52/100).
| Specification | Samsung Galaxy S9+ | Vivo Y32t | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Samsung Exynos 9810 | MediaTek Helio P70 () | |
| AnTuTu | 583956 | — | |
| Geekbench Single | 769 | — | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2000 | — | |
| Display | 6.2" Super AMOLED | 6.5" LCD IPS | |
| Resolution | 2960x1440 | 720x1600 | |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | — | |
| Battery | 3500 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 15W | — | |
| Wireless charging | 10W | 0W | |
| Main camera | 12 MP | 13 MP | |
| Telephoto | 12 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 8 MP | 8 MP | |
| RAM | 6GB | — | |
| Storage | 64GB / 128GB / 256GB | 128GB / 256GB | |
| OS | Android 8.0 | Android 11 Red Velvet Cake | |
| NFC | yes | no | |
| Protection | IP68 | — | |
| Dimensions | 158.1×73.8×8.5 mm | 164.0×75.2×8.3 mm | |
| Weight | 189 g | 179 g | |
| Price | $840 | — |
Samsung Galaxy S9+
- Main: 12MP f/1.5
- Telephoto: 12MP
- Front: 8MP
Vivo Y32t
- Main: 13MP
- Front: 8MP
Samsung Galaxy S9+
- 6.2" Super AMOLED
- Resolution: 2960x1440
- Refresh rate: 60 Hz
Vivo Y32t
- 6.5" LCD IPS
- Resolution: 720x1600
- Refresh rate: —
Samsung Galaxy S9+
- 3500 mAh
- Wired: 15W
- Wireless: 10W
Vivo Y32t
- 5000 mAh
- No wireless charging
Vivo Y32t
Price unknownperformance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100.
display
In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100.
camera
In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S9+ and the Vivo Y32t are nearly equal (4/100 vs 0/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo Y32t significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S9+ (36/100 vs 1/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Vivo Y32t is a bit better (76/100 vs 63/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, the Vivo Y32t and the Samsung Galaxy S9+ are nearly equal (55/100 vs 52/100).
Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy S9+ or the Vivo Y32t?
The Vivo Y32t edges out the Samsung Galaxy S9+ by just 5 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy S9+ and the Vivo Y32t?
The Samsung Galaxy S9+ has a MobileRank rating of 6/100, the Vivo Y32t — 11/100.
Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy S9+ over the Vivo Y32t?
The Samsung Galaxy S9+ is a better fit for everyday use. The Vivo Y32t is a better fit for everyday use.