Samsung Galaxy S26 vs Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5

The Samsung Galaxy S26 (2026) runs on the Samsung Exynos 2600, while the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5 (2023) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2; launch prices were $799 and $1799. By overall MobileRank rating, the Samsung Galaxy S26 leads — 74/100 vs 65/100 (a 9-point difference). Key differences: the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5 has the bigger battery (4400 mAh vs 4000); the Samsung Galaxy S26 is faster in AnTuTu (2,827,538 vs 1,818,396); per DXOMark lab testing, the Samsung Galaxy S26 has the stronger camera (146 vs 128); the Samsung Galaxy S26 is noticeably lighter (162g vs 253g).

The Samsung Galaxy S26 edges out the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5 by just 9 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.

Profile comparison

Category scores

Samsung Galaxy S26

Performance 89
Display 81
Camera 77
Battery 31
Portability 89
Value for money 62

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5

Performance 76
Display 78
Camera 63
Battery 39
Portability 52
Value for money 38

What makes Samsung Galaxy S26 better?

  • Higher AnTuTu: 2827538 vs 1818396
  • Better Geekbench Single: 2880 vs 2004
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 9100 vs 5311
  • Lighter: 162g vs 253g
  • Cheaper at launch: $799 vs $1799

  • Higher performance (89/100 vs 76/100)
  • Better camera (77/100 vs 63/100)
  • Better display (81/100 vs 78/100)
  • Better portability (89/100 vs 52/100)

What makes Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5 better?

  • Bigger battery: 4400 vs 4000 mAh

  • Longer battery life (39/100 vs 31/100)

Comparison verdict

Comparing the Samsung Galaxy S26 vs the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5, the Samsung Galaxy S26 scores 9 points higher (74/100 vs 65/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 leads (89/100 vs 76/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 leads (77/100 vs 63/100). Value score: Samsung Galaxy S26 — 62/100, Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5 — 38/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 is a bit better (89/100 vs 76/100). In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 and the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5 are nearly equal (81/100 vs 78/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 is a bit better (77/100 vs 63/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5 is a bit better (39/100 vs 31/100). In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5 (89/100 vs 52/100).

Samsung Galaxy S26: The Samsung Galaxy S26 is a better fit for gamers and power users.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5: The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5 is a better fit for active users.

Specs comparison

Specification Samsung Galaxy S26 Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5
Processor Samsung Exynos 2600 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
AnTuTu 2827538 1818396
Geekbench Single 2880 2004
Geekbench Multi 9100 5311
Display 6.2" Dynamic AMOLED 2X 7.6" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
Resolution 2340x1080 2176x1812
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 4000 mAh 4400 mAh
Charging 25W 25W
Wireless charging 15W 15W
DXOMark (camera) 146 128
Main camera 50 MP 50 MP
Ultrawide 12 MP 12 MP
Telephoto 10 MP 10 MP
Front camera 12 MP 10 MP
RAM 12GB 12GB
Storage 128GB / 256GB / 512GB 256GB / 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 16 / One UI 8.5 Android 13
Brightness (peak) 2600 nits —
NFC yes yes
Protection IP68 IPX8
Dimensions 158.4×75.8×7.3 mm 154.9×129.9×6.1 mm
Weight 162 g 253 g
Launch price $799 $1799

Camera comparison

Samsung Galaxy S26

  • Main: 50MP f/1.8
  • Ultrawide: 12MP
  • Telephoto: 10MP
  • Front: 12MP
77
camera

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5

  • Main: 50MP f/1.8
  • Ultrawide: 12MP
  • Telephoto: 10MP
  • Front: 10MP
63
camera

Display comparison

Samsung Galaxy S26

  • 6.2" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
  • Resolution: 2340x1080
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
81
display

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5

  • 7.6" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
  • Resolution: 2176x1812
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
78
display

Battery and charging

Samsung Galaxy S26

  • 4000 mAh
  • Wired: 25W
  • Wireless: 15W
31
battery

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5

  • 4400 mAh
  • Wired: 25W
  • Wireless: 15W
39
battery

Overall performance score

We compared Samsung Galaxy S26 and Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Samsung Galaxy S26 Samsung Exynos 2600
74/100
2827538 AnTuTu
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
65/100 -55.5%
1818396 AnTuTu

Samsung Galaxy S26 leads Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5 by 55.5% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks

Launch prices and where to check today's

Samsung Galaxy S26

$799

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5

$1799

Launch price difference: $1000. Samsung Galaxy S26 was $1000 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 is a bit better (89/100 vs 76/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 and the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5 are nearly equal (81/100 vs 78/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 is a bit better (77/100 vs 63/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5 is a bit better (39/100 vs 31/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5 (89/100 vs 52/100).

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy S26 or the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5?

The Samsung Galaxy S26 edges out the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5 by just 9 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.

What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy S26 and the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5?

The Samsung Galaxy S26 has a MobileRank rating of 74/100, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5 — 65/100.

Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy S26 or the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5?

The Samsung Galaxy S26 leads on camera score (77/100 vs 63/100).

Which is more powerful: the Samsung Galaxy S26 or the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5?

The Samsung Galaxy S26 leads on performance (89/100 vs 76/100).

Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy S26 over the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5?

The Samsung Galaxy S26 is a better fit for gamers and power users. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5 is a better fit for active users.