Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra vs Vivo Y16
The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, while the Vivo Y16 (2022) runs on the MediaTek Helio P35. By overall MobileRank rating, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra leads — 80/100 vs 30/100 (a 50-point difference). Key differences: the main camera is 200 MP vs 13 MP; the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (3,128,552 vs 199,111); the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra has NFC for contactless payments, the Vivo Y16 doesn't; the Vivo Y16 is noticeably lighter (184g vs 218g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Vivo Y16
What makes Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3128552 vs 199111
- Better Geekbench Single: 3100 vs 476
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9760 vs 828
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 13MP
- Higher performance (92/100 vs 19/100)
- Better camera (81/100 vs 10/100)
- Better display (88/100 vs 39/100)
What makes Vivo Y16 better?
- Lighter: 184g vs 218g
- Longer battery life (66/100 vs 56/100)
- Better portability (67/100 vs 46/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra vs the Vivo Y16, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra scores 50 points higher (80/100 vs 30/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra leads (92/100 vs 19/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra leads (81/100 vs 10/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo Y16 leads (66/100 vs 56/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra significantly outperforms the Vivo Y16 (92/100 vs 19/100). In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra significantly outperforms the Vivo Y16 (88/100 vs 39/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra significantly outperforms the Vivo Y16 (81/100 vs 10/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo Y16 is a bit better (66/100 vs 56/100). In the "portability" category, the Vivo Y16 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra (67/100 vs 46/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra | Vivo Y16 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | MediaTek Helio P35 | |
| AnTuTu | 3128552 | 199111 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3100 | 476 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 9760 | 828 | |
| Display | 6.9" Dynamic AMOLED 2X | 6.5" LCD IPS | |
| Resolution | 3120x1440 | 720x1600 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | — | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 45W | — | |
| Wireless charging | 15W | — | |
| DXOMark (camera) | 151 | — | |
| Main camera | 200 MP | 13 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 0 MP | |
| Telephoto | 50 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 12 MP | 5 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 3GB / 4GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | 32GB / 64GB / 128GB | |
| OS | Android 15 / One UI 7 | Android 12, Funtouch 12 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 2600 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | no | |
| Protection | IP68 | — | |
| Dimensions | 162.8×77.6×8.2 mm | 164.0×75.6×8.2 mm | |
| Weight | 218 g | 184 g | |
| Launch price | $1299 | — |
Camera comparison
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
- Main: 200MP f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 12MP
Vivo Y16
- Main: 13MP f/2.2
- Front: 5MP
Display comparison
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
- 6.9" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
- Resolution: 3120x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo Y16
- 6.5" LCD IPS
- Resolution: 720x1600
- Refresh rate: —
Battery and charging
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
- 5000 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 11:10 hrs, total 28:43 hrs
- Wired: 45W
- Wireless: 15W
Vivo Y16
- 5000 mAh
- Wireless charging: no data
Overall performance score
We compared Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra and Vivo Y16, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra leads Vivo Y16 by 1471.3% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Vivo Y16
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra significantly outperforms the Vivo Y16 (92/100 vs 19/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra significantly outperforms the Vivo Y16 (88/100 vs 39/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra significantly outperforms the Vivo Y16 (81/100 vs 10/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo Y16 is a bit better (66/100 vs 56/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Vivo Y16 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra (67/100 vs 46/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra or the Vivo Y16?
The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra significantly outperforms the Vivo Y16 by 50 points (80/100 vs 30/100).
What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra and the Vivo Y16?
The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra has a MobileRank rating of 80/100, the Vivo Y16 — 30/100.
Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra or the Vivo Y16?
The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra leads on camera score (81/100 vs 10/100).
Which is more powerful: the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra or the Vivo Y16?
The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra leads on performance (92/100 vs 19/100).
Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra over the Vivo Y16?
The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts.