Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim vs Tecno Pop X
Comparing the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim (2024) and the Tecno Pop X (2026) on specs and benchmarks. By overall MobileRank rating, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim leads — 37/100 vs 26/100 (a 11-point difference). Key differences: the main camera is 200 MP vs 13 MP; the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim has NFC for contactless payments, the Tecno Pop X doesn't.
Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim
Tecno Pop X
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 13MP
- Better camera (81/100 vs 0/100)
- Longer battery life (36/100 vs 0/100)
- Better design/ergonomics (67/100 vs 50/100)
- Better value for money (100/100 vs 55/100)
Comparing the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim vs the Tecno Pop X, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim scores 11 points higher (37/100 vs 26/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim leads (81/100 vs 0/100). In the "battery" category, the Tecno Pop X leads (36/100 vs 0/100). In the "value for money" category, the Tecno Pop X leads (100/100 vs 55/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100. In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100. In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim significantly outperforms the Tecno Pop X (81/100 vs 0/100). In the "battery" category, the Tecno Pop X significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim (36/100 vs 0/100). In the "design" category, the Tecno Pop X notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim (67/100 vs 50/100). In the "value for money" category, the Tecno Pop X significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim (100/100 vs 55/100).
| Specification | Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim | Tecno Pop X | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | — | Unisoc T7250 | |
| AnTuTu | — | 310000 | |
| Geekbench Single | — | 600 | |
| Geekbench Multi | — | 1800 | |
| Display | 6.7" OLED | 6.8" LCD | |
| Resolution | 1080x2400 | 1600x720 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | — | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | — | 15W | |
| Main camera | 200 MP | 13 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 0 MP | |
| Telephoto | 50 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 10 MP | 8 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB | 4GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB / 512GB | 64GB | |
| OS | Android 15, One UI 7 | Android 15 | |
| NFC | yes | no | |
| Protection | IP68 | IP64 | |
| Dimensions | — | 167.9×79.3×8.2 mm | |
| Weight | — | 186 g | |
| Price | — | $100 |
Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim
- Main: 200MP
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 10MP
Tecno Pop X
- Main: 13MP f/f/1.85
- Front: 8MP
Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim
- 6.7" OLED
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Tecno Pop X
- 6.8" LCD
- Resolution: 1600x720
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim
- —
- No wireless charging
Tecno Pop X
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 15W
- No wireless charging
Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim
Price unknownperformance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100.
display
In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100.
camera
In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim significantly outperforms the Tecno Pop X (81/100 vs 0/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Tecno Pop X significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim (36/100 vs 0/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Tecno Pop X notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim (67/100 vs 50/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, the Tecno Pop X significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim (100/100 vs 55/100).
Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim or the Tecno Pop X?
The Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim is noticeably better than the Tecno Pop X — the overall rating gap is 11 points.
What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim and the Tecno Pop X?
The Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim has a MobileRank rating of 37/100, the Tecno Pop X — 26/100.
Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim or the Tecno Pop X?
The Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim leads on camera score (81/100 vs 0/100).
Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim over the Tecno Pop X?
The Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim is a better fit for mobile photography enthusiasts. The Tecno Pop X is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers.